A case in which the Court held that New York's law requiring applications for concealed-carry licenses to show a special need for self-protection violates their rights under the Second Amendment and Fourteenth Amendments.

A case in which the Court held that federal courts do not have subject-matter jurisdiction to confirm or vacate an arbitration award under Sections 9 and 10 of the Federal Arbitration Act when the only basis for jurisdiction is that the underlying dispute involved a federal question.

A case in which the Court will decide whether the First Amendment restricts the authority of an elected body to issue a censure resolution in response to a member’s speech.

A case in which the Court allowed abortion providers to pursue a pre-enforcement action against certain defendants but not others over a state law that prohibits the exercise of a constitutional right by delegating to the general public the authority to enforce that prohibition through civil actions.

A case in which the Court will decide whether the United States may sue the State of Texas in federal court to prohibit enforcement of an unconstitutional abortion law.

A case in which the Court held a civil service pension received for federal civilian employment as a “military technician (dual status)” is not “a payment based wholly on service as a member of a uniformed service” for the purposes of the Social Security Act’s windfall elimination provision.

A case in which the Court reinstated the death penalty for Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.

A case in which the Court held that a plaintiff who seeks to bring a Section 1983 action alleging unreasonable seizure pursuant to legal process need only show, as a threshold matter, that the criminal proceeding against him ended without a conviction.

A case in which the Court will decide whether a state attorney general should be permitted to intervene after a federal court of appeals invalidates a state statute and no other state actor will defend the law.

A case in which the Court held that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit erred in rejecting the United States’s assertion of the state-secrets privilege based on the court’s own assessment of potential harms to national security on matters concerning alleged clandestine CIA activities.