A case in which the Court held that Florida could not show that it Georgia had caused harm to its oyster fisheries and thus was not entitled to equitable or injunctive relief.

A case in which the Court held that federal law permits a court of appeals to review any issue included in a district court’s order sending a case to state court when the move to state court is based on two statutes, not just the ground for removal itself.

A case in which the Court held that the Federal Communications Commission’s 2017 decision to repeal or modify three of its media ownership rules was not arbitrary or capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act.

A case in which the Court will decide whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, below, erred in vacating as arbitrary and capricious the FCC’s orders that substantially changed its approach to regulation of broadcast media ownership.

A case in which the Court held that federal law permits a court of appeals to review any issue included in a district court’s order sending a case to state court when the move to state court is based on two statutes, not just the ground for removal itself.

A case in which the Court held that Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, by authorizing “injunction[s],” does not authorizes the Federal Trade Commission to demand monetary relief such as restitution.

A case in which the Court held that a request for nominal damages satisfies the redressability element necessary for Article III standing where a plaintiff’s claim is based on a completed violation of a legal right.

A case in which the Court held that Section §1231, not §1226, applies to the detention of a nonresident who is subject to a reinstated removal order and who is pursuing withholding or deferral of removal.

A case in which the Court held that the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s (FHFA) structure violates the separation of powers but that courts need not set aside the final agency action that FHFA took when it was unconstitutionally structured.