
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Jack argued early this week that it’s impossible to know whether the U.S. attack against Iran was constitutional “because the constitutional law of war powers is inscrutable.” Bob responded to Jack’s post, contending that although executive branch legal opinions provide support for the attack, that doesn’t resolve the constitutional problem.
On this episode, we disagree about the constitutionality of this particular attack, but we agree that our war powers law has reached an unfortunate state of presidential dominance.
By Bob Bauer and Jack Goldsmith4.4
77 ratings
Jack argued early this week that it’s impossible to know whether the U.S. attack against Iran was constitutional “because the constitutional law of war powers is inscrutable.” Bob responded to Jack’s post, contending that although executive branch legal opinions provide support for the attack, that doesn’t resolve the constitutional problem.
On this episode, we disagree about the constitutionality of this particular attack, but we agree that our war powers law has reached an unfortunate state of presidential dominance.

4,074 Listeners

1,365 Listeners

1,108 Listeners

2,029 Listeners

6,317 Listeners

7,230 Listeners

4,644 Listeners

5,820 Listeners

3,920 Listeners

16,229 Listeners

402 Listeners

744 Listeners

338 Listeners

432 Listeners

782 Listeners