
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Jack argued early this week that it’s impossible to know whether the U.S. attack against Iran was constitutional “because the constitutional law of war powers is inscrutable.” Bob responded to Jack’s post, contending that although executive branch legal opinions provide support for the attack, that doesn’t resolve the constitutional problem.
On this episode, we disagree about the constitutionality of this particular attack, but we agree that our war powers law has reached an unfortunate state of presidential dominance.
By Bob Bauer and Jack Goldsmith4.4
77 ratings
Jack argued early this week that it’s impossible to know whether the U.S. attack against Iran was constitutional “because the constitutional law of war powers is inscrutable.” Bob responded to Jack’s post, contending that although executive branch legal opinions provide support for the attack, that doesn’t resolve the constitutional problem.
On this episode, we disagree about the constitutionality of this particular attack, but we agree that our war powers law has reached an unfortunate state of presidential dominance.

4,113 Listeners

1,380 Listeners

1,110 Listeners

2,031 Listeners

6,304 Listeners

7,244 Listeners

4,650 Listeners

5,832 Listeners

3,946 Listeners

16,525 Listeners

399 Listeners

746 Listeners

457 Listeners

431 Listeners

804 Listeners