
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


On today’s episode of Hear Me Out… host Celeste Headlee introduces Slate’s newest podcast with a question: what if we could argue with each other without hating the results?
Hugh Breakey, writer and moral philosopher, thinks it’s possible. He and Celeste discuss the case for arguing with each other on difficult topics, and giving up the idea that every argument needs a winner. It’s not just a good idea, according to Breakey — it’s a moral imperative.
Podcast production by Maura Currie
You can skip all the ads in Hear Me Out by joining Slate Plus. Sign up now at slate.com/plus for just $15 for your first three months.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
By Slate Podcasts3.8
6060 ratings
On today’s episode of Hear Me Out… host Celeste Headlee introduces Slate’s newest podcast with a question: what if we could argue with each other without hating the results?
Hugh Breakey, writer and moral philosopher, thinks it’s possible. He and Celeste discuss the case for arguing with each other on difficult topics, and giving up the idea that every argument needs a winner. It’s not just a good idea, according to Breakey — it’s a moral imperative.
Podcast production by Maura Currie
You can skip all the ads in Hear Me Out by joining Slate Plus. Sign up now at slate.com/plus for just $15 for your first three months.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

8,490 Listeners

1,378 Listeners

1,027 Listeners

2,845 Listeners

995 Listeners

1,029 Listeners

5,637 Listeners

1,872 Listeners

53 Listeners

2,066 Listeners

239 Listeners

23,899 Listeners

1,284 Listeners

1,195 Listeners

436 Listeners

48 Listeners

97 Listeners

7 Listeners

130 Listeners

0 Listeners