
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


On today’s episode of Hear Me Out… host Celeste Headlee introduces Slate’s newest podcast with a question: what if we could argue with each other without hating the results?
Hugh Breakey, writer and moral philosopher, thinks it’s possible. He and Celeste discuss the case for arguing with each other on difficult topics, and giving up the idea that every argument needs a winner. It’s not just a good idea, according to Breakey — it’s a moral imperative.
Podcast production by Maura Currie
You can skip all the ads in Hear Me Out by joining Slate Plus. Sign up now at slate.com/plus for just $15 for your first three months.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
By Slate Podcasts3.8
6060 ratings
On today’s episode of Hear Me Out… host Celeste Headlee introduces Slate’s newest podcast with a question: what if we could argue with each other without hating the results?
Hugh Breakey, writer and moral philosopher, thinks it’s possible. He and Celeste discuss the case for arguing with each other on difficult topics, and giving up the idea that every argument needs a winner. It’s not just a good idea, according to Breakey — it’s a moral imperative.
Podcast production by Maura Currie
You can skip all the ads in Hear Me Out by joining Slate Plus. Sign up now at slate.com/plus for just $15 for your first three months.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

8,454 Listeners

1,378 Listeners

1,028 Listeners

2,841 Listeners

998 Listeners

1,029 Listeners

5,624 Listeners

1,866 Listeners

53 Listeners

2,065 Listeners

238 Listeners

23,889 Listeners

1,285 Listeners

1,197 Listeners

447 Listeners

48 Listeners

97 Listeners

6 Listeners

131 Listeners

0 Listeners