Wealth Formula Podcast

Wealth Formula Podcast

By Buck JoffreyBusinessInvesting
Download on the App Store
  • Favorites

    158

    Followers

  • Typical duration

    30 min

    per episode

Based on Podcast App listening data

Wealth Formula Podcast episodes

  • 145: Nic Carter on the REAL Value of Blockchain
    Bitcoin and Blockchain are not dead. In fact, if you look at the history of bitcoin itself you see that it seems to have a feline propensity for multiple lives. After being battered and beaten up so many times, why is bitcoin not dead? I am reminded of a movie that I recently watched with my nine year old daughter from the late eighties called The Princess Bride. If you happened to miss this one, you really ought to see it. It's a very funny love story based in the the middle ages with pirates, kings, and lots of sword fighting. The love story is between a farm boy called Wesley and Buttercup. The two are separated as Wesley goes off to sea and Buttercup presumes he is dead. Years later, she is chosen by the local King to marry and she agrees although she knows that she can never love again. Now this king is a bad guy and he knows that Wesley is not only alive but coming back to claim his beloved. Eventually, Wesley is caught and tortured to death by the King's minions. However, Wesley's allies need him back alive to defeat the king so, after finding him apparently dead, they bring him to a magician who was recently fired by the King. This former disgruntled employee of the King, played by Billy Crystal, says that Wesley is actually "mostly dead" but refuses to help unless there is a true meaningful reason to bring him back to life. So, he pushes air into Wesley's mouth and squeezes on his chest. What comes out of Wesley's mouth is "true love". The magician admits that this is, indeed, the most noble cause to bring him back alive but tries to get out of it anyway. But when he finds out that bringing him back will help him get revenge on his former employer, the King, he agrees and brings him back to life. OK, so perhaps my metaphor is a little overboard, but just like "true love" was worth bringing back to life in The Princess Bride, bitcoin has been brought back from the brinks of "mostly dead" several times over because of what it represents. What bitcoin represents is the ultimate storage of value. It has all the traits of gold but it's better because it is portable and can easily be transferred from peer to peer thousands of miles away from one another without the need for a central authority like a bank. Bitcoin is not hackable because it is decentralized and there is a finite amount making it "unprintable". Like many people, up until 2016, I didn't get it and maybe I don't entirely understand even now. However, this concept of eliminating the middle man is so powerful that I now believe that it CAN NOT be stomped out by anyone or any entity. That powerful message, unfortunately, has been bastardized by many like Tai Lopez and other charlatans who took advantage of people with the idea of getting rich fast because of the explosive growth of cryptocurrency. The bubble created in the frenzy of greed and subsequent popping of that bubble has led to the current round of bitcoin obituaries. That said, the concept of bitcoin and distributed ledgers in general, is anything but dead. It is actually in its early years and it is simply experiencing the growing pains of any new technology or concept that is new to the world. There is value in what is being created and people will continue to make a lot of money in the future from it. They may do so through owning cryptocurrency or through creating the infrastructure surrounding this new economy. For example, collateralized bitcoin lending services have nothing to do with investing in bitcoin, but they make a lot of money through a fairly traditional lending business model. There is so much going on out there. It's just important to make sure you are listening to the right people. One of the legitimately smartest individuals in crypto today is Nic Carter. He is not a social media figure and he does not have a newsletter. However, for those at the highest levels of cryptocurrency investing and technology, Nic has a voice to which everyone listens. So, despite the polar vortex sweeping across the cryptocurrency world, this week I urge you to listen to my conversation with Nic on Wealth Formula Podcast. Shownotes: Nic Carter's background What's is Coinmetrics How is Coinmetrics different than bits activity and other competitors Castle Island Blockchain, blockchain, blockchain… When will the impact of institutional interest reflect the market? Learn more about Nic Carter https://medium.com/@nic__carter
    55 min
  • 144: Millennial Money with Grant Sabatier

    If I have given you the impression that my life since leaving surgical training has been all ups and no downs, I have unintentionally misled you.

    The first business I started which was an owner operated medical business did well quickly its true. It allowed me to start investing in real estate. But that first acquisition I did not go well and it turned out to be a $300K lesson in how due diligence should NOT be done.

    I’m happy to say that my fortunes with real estate have, indeed, been quite good since that time. But some of my business ventures have been up and down.

    A few years ago when my initial medical business seemed to be slowing down (around 2012), I started to look around for business models within medicine that could hedge my position. My first business, as some of you know, was a cosmetic surgical business that was all cash pay and it still exists in Chicago.

    The second business was related to a business covered by insurance. I decided I would stop being an operator on the first business and focus on this second business to create that hedge as soon as possible. That was around 2014 or so. My hunch was that with this second, insurance based model, I was on to something and that there was a window of opportunity to take advantage of it.

    I was right. In fact, that second model made a seven figure plus profit in its first year and pretty much made up for the lagging cosmetic business. I felt like a genius for doing what I did.

    In fact, not only did the new business save the old one, it seemed to some how drive a lot of energy into the initial cosmetic business. All of the sudden, it seemed like everything I touched was turning into another million dollar business. I bought some more apartment buildings around that time which was a really good move as well.

    But…I also ended up doing something stupid. I decided that if my cosmetic business could be successful in the third largest market in the country, I could open up a few more across the country and really kill it. I figured if I could do what I was doing in Chicago in four other medium size markets,  I could potentially walk away with $40-50 million dollars.

    Now, that in and of itself was not a bad idea. I’ve seen similar things done. In fact, a company emerged at around the same time that was doing almost the exact same thing. However, they had a couple of advantages over me.

    First, they knew what they were doing! I knew how to dominate one city and I had the staff who could execute what I wanted them to do. I did not have the operational skill set, nor did my staff, of replicating our business model in multiple different states. My competitor was staffed with professional operators and the deep pockets of private equity making sure to guide their investment towards success.

    That brings me to the other major advantage of my competitor: capitalization. I was making so much money in 2014, I figured I’d do the whole thing myself. My competitor was using private equity money with unlimited pocket depth that would see the project through despite a few years of multimillion dollar losses.

    Suffice it to say, I lost that battle. After losing a small fortune, I retreated back to Chicago. The good news was, that despite the failure, the two Chicago based businesses were still killing it but now a lot of that money was going into paying down debt from the failed venture rather than underpriced Chicago real estate.

    When I think about what I could have made with that money by buying more real estate in the Chicago rather than trying to expand that business is mind boggling. Everything was on sale. A couple of the properties I did buy during that era were sold last year for returns of 500% and 600% on equity (and they cash flowed all the way through the 3-4 year hold periods)

    In hindsight, what could I have done differently? Well, I could have just done what I said…taken all that money and dumped it into real estate and other investments outside of my core businesses. That might have been the easiest.

    Given how my businesses were doing at that time, I could have also looked into private equity, at least for the cosmetic business. I could have let them buy a portion of my company and help me scale with them. That would have allowed me to take some money off the table and share the risk with an operator who understood how to scale the way I wanted (the leveraged buy-out option).

    Either option would have been better than what I did. The truth is that it is all easy to see in hindsight. When you are making money like I was for the first time, it’s hard to see clearly and you can feel invincible. 

    Now, going back to business two—it was a business that I knew could make a lot of money but I also knew that it was not a long term thing. It involved procedures that people needed but for which insurance companies were paying a lot of money. I knew that wasn’t going to last. The insurance companies would catch up with me. It was a business that I considered as having planned obsolescence—sort of like an iphone that works great at first but has a built in self-destruct button after a few years.

    For a variety of reasons, after a three year ride, that business found its end last year and I lost about $700K on it. It’s a long story and if you are in Wealth Formula Network I can explain. 

    Lessons learned for me:

    1. My ability is an operator are limited. I am an exceptional idea guy but someone else has to do the operational part. Similarly, I can identify a great real estate opportunity that involves value add. But I’m not the operator who can add the value. I’m going to partner with an operator who has a track record of pulling it off.
    2. Entrepreneurs have a tendency to chase the shiny object—that means they like to start new businesses. Once a business gets off the ground and it’s successful, they lose interest and chase the next business. I was guilty of that for sure and now I make a conscious effort to say no.
    3. When you are making a lot of money, don’t throw all of it back in the business. If you do, you expose yourself to single point failure. If business two had not bailed out my cosmetic expansion attempt back in 2014, I would have been toast. These days, I worry less about business expansion and more about constantly deploying capital into real estate projects that will stably create wealth over the next few years. My goal this year is to deploy no less than 60 percent (hopefully 75 percent) of every penny that I make into real estate projects primarily with one or two operators that I consider the best in the business.
    4. It’s amazing how much you can learn in a short period of time through a little bit of trauma. One or two failures will teach you a hell of a lot more than a thousand successes.

      That leads me to my final take-away of the day—listen to people who have a little bit of scar tissue. Every highly successful entrepreneur and investor has had some kind of failure at some point that made them a lot better at what they do.

      I remember thinking my dad was crazy for things he said to me in the past that don’t seem so crazy today. I remember, long before Robert Kiyosaki’s Rich Dad Poor Dad, my dad talking about cash flow all the time—especially after getting slaughtered with tech stocks in the dotcom melt down of the late nineties. I also remember him telling me that going to medical school was not going to make me rich and that I should just buy real estate. He thought it was silly that I took so much pride in being published in medical journals as a surgical resident while getting paid $30K per year.

      There is truth in all of the things he said to varying degrees but none of it seemed useful to listen to as a kid or even an idealistic surgical resident in my twenties.

      So, if you are a millennial, make sure to search out some gray hairs for opinions too while listening to the voices of your own generation that seem to be ahead of the curve.

      Speaking of millennials who are ahead of the curve, my guest today is one of the voices of millennial money. In fact, his blog, millennialmoney.com has about 10 million readers. He just a started a podcast and Tony Robbins asked him if he could be a guest (FYI Tony has not reached out to me yet).

      His name is Grant Sabatier and he is my guest on Wealth Formula Podcast this week. 

      • Grant Sabatier’s background
      • The Escape
      • Conventional Wisdom
      • What is Wealth?
      • Retirement formula
      • Millenialmoney.com
      • Financialfreedombook.com
      • 1 hr 9 min
      • 144: Millennial Money with Grant Sabatier
        If I have given you the impression that my life since leaving surgical training has been all ups and no downs, I have unintentionally misled you. The first business I started which was an owner operated medical business did well quickly its true. It allowed me to start investing in real estate. But that first acquisition I did not go well and it turned out to be a $300K lesson in how due diligence should NOT be done. I'm happy to say that my fortunes with real estate have, indeed, been quite good since that time. But some of my business ventures have been up and down. A few years ago when my initial medical business seemed to be slowing down (around 2012), I started to look around for business models within medicine that could hedge my position. My first business, as some of you know, was a cosmetic surgical business that was all cash pay and it still exists in Chicago. The second business was related to a business covered by insurance. I decided I would stop being an operator on the first business and focus on this second business to create that hedge as soon as possible. That was around 2014 or so. My hunch was that with this second, insurance based model, I was on to something and that there was a window of opportunity to take advantage of it. I was right. In fact, that second model made a seven figure plus profit in its first year and pretty much made up for the lagging cosmetic business. I felt like a genius for doing what I did. In fact, not only did the new business save the old one, it seemed to some how drive a lot of energy into the initial cosmetic business. All of the sudden, it seemed like everything I touched was turning into another million dollar business. I bought some more apartment buildings around that time which was a really good move as well. But…I also ended up doing something stupid. I decided that if my cosmetic business could be successful in the third largest market in the country, I could open up a few more across the country and really kill it. I figured if I could do what I was doing in Chicago in four other medium size markets, I could potentially walk away with $40-50 million dollars. Now, that in and of itself was not a bad idea. I've seen similar things done. In fact, a company emerged at around the same time that was doing almost the exact same thing. However, they had a couple of advantages over me. First, they knew what they were doing! I knew how to dominate one city and I had the staff who could execute what I wanted them to do. I did not have the operational skill set, nor did my staff, of replicating our business model in multiple different states. My competitor was staffed with professional operators and the deep pockets of private equity making sure to guide their investment towards success. That brings me to the other major advantage of my competitor: capitalization. I was making so much money in 2014, I figured I'd do the whole thing myself. My competitor was using private equity money with unlimited pocket depth that would see the project through despite a few years of multimillion dollar losses. Suffice it to say, I lost that battle. After losing a small fortune, I retreated back to Chicago. The good news was, that despite the failure, the two Chicago based businesses were still killing it but now a lot of that money was going into paying down debt from the failed venture rather than underpriced Chicago real estate. When I think about what I could have made with that money by buying more real estate in the Chicago rather than trying to expand that business is mind boggling. Everything was on sale. A couple of the properties I did buy during that era were sold last year for returns of 500% and 600% on equity (and they cash flowed all the way through the 3-4 year hold periods) In hindsight, what could I have done differently? Well, I could have just done what I said…taken all that money and dumped it into real estate and other investments outside of my core businesses. That might have been the easiest. Given how my businesses were doing at that time, I could have also looked into private equity, at least for the cosmetic business. I could have let them buy a portion of my company and help me scale with them. That would have allowed me to take some money off the table and share the risk with an operator who understood how to scale the way I wanted (the leveraged buy-out option). Either option would have been better than what I did. The truth is that it is all easy to see in hindsight. When you are making money like I was for the first time, it's hard to see clearly and you can feel invincible. Now, going back to business two—it was a business that I knew could make a lot of money but I also knew that it was not a long term thing. It involved procedures that people needed but for which insurance companies were paying a lot of money. I knew that wasn't going to last. The insurance companies would catch up with me. It was a business that I considered as having planned obsolescence—sort of like an iphone that works great at first but has a built in self-destruct button after a few years. For a variety of reasons, after a three year ride, that business found its end last year and I lost about $700K on it. It's a long story and if you are in Wealth Formula Network I can explain. Lessons learned for me: My ability is an operator are limited. I am an exceptional idea guy but someone else has to do the operational part. Similarly, I can identify a great real estate opportunity that involves value add. But I'm not the operator who can add the value. I'm going to partner with an operator who has a track record of pulling it off. Entrepreneurs have a tendency to chase the shiny object—that means they like to start new businesses. Once a business gets off the ground and it's successful, they lose interest and chase the next business. I was guilty of that for sure and now I make a conscious effort to say no. When you are making a lot of money, don't throw all of it back in the business. If you do, you expose yourself to single point failure. If business two had not bailed out my cosmetic expansion attempt back in 2014, I would have been toast. These days, I worry less about business expansion and more about constantly deploying capital into real estate projects that will stably create wealth over the next few years. My goal this year is to deploy no less than 60 percent (hopefully 75 percent) of every penny that I make into real estate projects primarily with one or two operators that I consider the best in the business. It's amazing how much you can learn in a short period of time through a little bit of trauma. One or two failures will teach you a hell of a lot more than a thousand successes. That leads me to my final take-away of the day—listen to people who have a little bit of scar tissue. Every highly successful entrepreneur and investor has had some kind of failure at some point that made them a lot better at what they do. I remember thinking my dad was crazy for things he said to me in the past that don't seem so crazy today. I remember, long before Robert Kiyosaki's Rich Dad Poor Dad, my dad talking about cash flow all the time—especially after getting slaughtered with tech stocks in the dotcom melt down of the late nineties. I also remember him telling me that going to medical school was not going to make me rich and that I should just buy real estate. He thought it was silly that I took so much pride in being published in medical journals as a surgical resident while getting paid $30K per year. There is truth in all of the things he said to varying degrees but none of it seemed useful to listen to as a kid or even an idealistic surgical resident in my twenties. So, if you are a millennial, make sure to search out some gray hairs for opinions too while listening to the voices of your own generation that seem to be ahead of the curve. Speaking of millennials who are ahead of the curve, my guest today is one of the voices of millennial money. In fact, his blog, millennialmoney.com has about 10 million readers. He just a started a podcast and Tony Robbins asked him if he could be a guest (FYI Tony has not reached out to me yet). His name is Grant Sabatier and he is my guest on Wealth Formula Podcast this week. Shownotes: Grant Sabatier's background The Escape Conventional Wisdom What is Wealth? Retirement formula Millenialmoney.com Financialfreedombook.com
        1 hr 8 min
      • 143: Who Cares About Poverty and Equality?
        It's so strange to think of the way our politics have evolved even in my lifetime. The first president I remember (barely) is Jimmy Carter. Most of grade school for me were the Reagan years. After a bumpy start, the 1980s became the roaring 80s. It was a decade remembered for wealth and excess. Remember Wall Street with Michael Douglas and Michael J. Fox as the Alex P. Keaton on Family Ties? The Republican party, at the time, was clearly the party of the rich and made little effort to concern itself with poverty and equality. Ideologically, it was a different mind sent. The appealing nature of the 80s was that it was aspirational. It was indeed Morning in America. After the hopelessness of the Carter economy, everyone seemed optimistic. That's why even the middle class, the traditionally democratic bastion of unions and the democratic party, defected. They became Reagan democrats. The good times continued through the 90s into the Clinton years. In fact, Clinton represented a new kind of democrat who embraced Wall Street and free trade. The old democratic party seemed dead and the difference between Democrats and Republicans was minimal. Rising tides raise all ships—even if some ships are rising more than others. A recent Brookings Institute analysis found that out of the last five presidents the largest annual income gains in the middle class occurred during the Reagan and Clinton years. In general, these were good times in America. People were generally pretty happy and optimistic. Now to be clear, there is a ton of data showing that it makes virtually no statistical difference to the economic performance of the country whether there is a Republican or Democrat in the White House. In fact, I hate to say it, but there is a very slight advantage to the democrats. What I'm getting at here is that when times were good economically for the middle class, there was less divisiveness in the country. It is no coincidence that over the last 2 decades, median household incomes have barely budged, wages are declining and that this corresponds to the rise of political and demographic divisiveness and demagoguery. Almost 80 percent of Americans believe that today's children will grow up worse-off than their parents. Think about that. That isn't Morning in America. That's downright depressing. Now what happens when people are not doing well and are worried about the future? Well, it starts with blaming everyone else for our problems. Maybe that's why anti-semitism and white nationalism is on the rise? People become more tribal and insular. They stick with their own and look for scapegoats. The worst example of this in recent history was, of course Nazi Germany which followed a horrific economic period of hyperinflation following the first world war as it was paying reparations. That was extreme but we now see a lot more divisiveness in our politics and both parties are pandering to our worst instincts. I really hate that my kids are growing up in this kind of polarized country. Now most of us are doing pretty well and we've made a lot of economic gains over the past several years after the great recession so it's easy to not recognize what is underlying all this strife. But that's a mistake. Why? Because eventually when enough people are hurting, they will come for us with pitchforks. Whether that's with literal civil unrest or 70 percent tax brackets suggested by the likes of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez—it's time to take this seriously. There are a lot of smart people who you might not expect to care that recognize what is going on and who have spoken about it extensively. Robert Kiyosaki, Billionaire Charles Koch, CEO of Koch industries, and even libertarians who most people consider insensitive to the poor recognize this. Now, how to deal with the problem is another issue entirely. This week, we speak with a libertarian from the Cato Institute, Mike Tanner, who shares some common sense strategies that are more nuanced than simply raising taxes. In fact, these strategies are probably the ones that make the most sense but get the least actual political attention. Shownotes: Mike Tanner's background Inequality and poverty from a practical perspective What's wrong with the criminal justice reform system now? The effect of zoning laws Occupational licensing Unemployment insurance Cato.org The Inclusive Economy
        35 min
      • 142: Gold: To Buy or Not to Buy? That is the Question
        Changing your personal financial belief system is like changing religions. Think about it. Maybe you grew up Christian or Jewish. Whether you practice or not, you have some pretty established beliefs. That's why it's not that common for people to convert from one religion to another. Maybe that's an extreme example but there is a parallel when it comes to changing your personal investment strategy. We grow up being told that the "responsible" thing to do is to find a nice financial advisor and invest in a broad portfolio of stocks, bonds and mutual funds. You see the commercials all the time, right? Well, this heretic can't stand those commercials! It drives me crazy because it reinforces the notion that there is a conventional financial pathway that is right and that it involves Wall Street. I broke away from that "religion" long ago and have followed the heretical path of real asset investing in "alternative" assets like real estate and precious metals. You gotta love the label "alternative", right? It makes you think of blue hair mohawks and nose rings—not the nice responsible looking people you see on those brokerage commercials. Now some of you know that I have been thinking controversial thoughts even within the "alternative" investing space lately. It's funny because I'm even a little uneasy about saying this but…I will come out of the closet. I no longer own gold. I know, I know. Some of you are disowning me as we speak. My own hero Robert Kiyosaki loves gold and, if he heard me say that I don't believe in it any more, he would never come on my show again. Fortunately, I'm quite confident he doesn't listen to my show so that shouldn't be a problem. I'll just wait a little while before I ask him to come back on again. For those of you who have not heard me explain my stance on gold—well, I just don't understand why I wouldn't just own more real estate instead. After all, the reason to buy gold is as an anti-dollar. Gold goes us as the dollar goes down. In other words, it's an inflationary hedge. But so is real estate. In fact, real estate also throws off cash flow and can be leveraged. It is no more volatile than gold and it has tax advantages up the wazoo. Taxes on the sale of gold, on the other hand, are worse than capital gains. Ok, so all that said, I'm still trying to keep an open mind. I'm talking to people and letting them try to convince me why I should own gold. And my guest this week makes some pretty compelling points. So, if you are trying to figure out whether or not you should own gold, listen to this week's episode of Wealth Formula Podcast. It may help you make the decision once and for all. Shownotes: Ken Lewis's background Out of all things, why gold? Gold's volatility What's gives gold its value? Owning physical gold How does Ken tie gold to blockchain? Passive income on the gold you own Real Estate vs Gold Onegold.com Apmex.com
        46 min
      • 142: Gold: To Buy or Not to Buy? That is the Question
        Changing your personal financial belief system is like changing religions. Think about it. Maybe you grew up Christian or Jewish. Whether you practice or not, you have some pretty established beliefs. That’s why it’s not that common for people to convert from one religion to another. Maybe that’s an extreme example but there is a […]
        47 min
      • 141: Tokenizing Real Estate with Matthew Sullivan
        Not everyone is that excited about blockchain. Especially these days as the market is about 90 percent down from its January highs. But remember, while the bubble was real, so is the technology. There is something here that will start to permeate our world—even if we have no desire to invest in cryptocurrencies. You see, blockchain and other distributed ledgers create a tremendous amount of efficiency. So-called security tokens essentially allow ownership of real things (just like a regular security) but allow for greater liquidity through secondary market platforms. Not surprisingly, we are starting to see blockchain projects creep their way into real estate. It's just a matter of time that title searches and escrow companies become as useful as syphilis doctors. The challenge, in my opinion, is identifying what projects are actually useful. What projects actually need a blockchain or create some additional value that is not already there. After all, it is well documented that a number of companies simply added blockchain to their name to seem more desirable in 2017. In fact, some publicly traded companies saw appreciable differences in their stock price after changing their names to include "blockchain". So, as much as I am a student of distributed ledger technology, I am also skeptical of many of the applications that I am seeing out there. In order for a project to be worth investing in, it has to create value that is not currently available. My guest today makes the case for the tokenization of real estate—specifically extracting equity from your personal residence through security tokenization instead of a home equity line of credit. He also speaks to the many other possible applications of blockchain to real estate investing. I thoroughly enjoyed this discussion with Matthew Sullivan from QuantmRE and, even if you don't care about cryptocurrency, you will find this interview interesting and useful. This brave new world of blockchain is here before us. You won't be able to ignore it.
        51 min
      • 140: Multifamily Mastery and Infinite Returns with Janet LePage
        I remember being in medical school thinking that I wanted to be a surgeon. The idea of it appealed to me very much. I certainly had the personality of a surgeon. But there was something about which I felt very insecure.You see, growing up, my dad was about as white collar as they get. I didn't learn anything about cars and never put up any shelves. The only reason to think I was any good with my hands at all was the fact that I excelled in hand-eye-coordination sports like ice hockey and table tennis (aka ping-pong).So as much as I loved the idea of being a surgeon, I had this big fear that I would be horrible at it. And, in the beginning, I kind of was! In medical school, all of the guys I liked were orthopedic surgeons. They were all into sports like me. The problem was that they were all carpenters at heart and I was NOT. I remember an orthopedic surgery resident handing me a saw to amputate a guy's leg at the VA. Having that tool in my hands wasn't pretty. Fortunately, the leg was suppose to come off anyway.Eventually, I realized that I was better at soft tissue surgery (no bones). I felt that I was better with fine movements than using power tools. That's one of the reasons I decided to operate on brains.In fact, the first time I ever used a drill, it was in medical school drilling through someone's skull on my neurosurgery rotation. I got pretty good with that drill after a while. It was the only power tool I liked.I remember getting confident enough practicing on people's skulls that I bought a drill at the hardware store to put up some shelves in my apartment for the first time. Okay…so all of this sounds a little messed up I know. But it's true. The good news for me was that there was a little bit of a learning curve getting my hands wet but pretty soon, I became a pretty darn good surgeon.In hindsight, the fear and anxiety of not being good at surgery was silly. As it turned out, becoming a good surgeon was really no different than becoming good at anything else in life—it took practice.In the case of most surgical procedures, you sort of do the same maneuvers every case. After my neurosurgery stint (which I left because of the hours), I spent some time doing cosmetic surgery. I watched the masters do hundreds of operations.There was one guy I watched that was particularly interesting to me because his results were so good and so consistent. What I noticed when I watched him carefully was that he did everything the same every single time. In fact, I counted about 6 discreet maneuvers that he did for every patient and wrote them down.When I started doing my own cases, I did those six steps and, from the very first case, my results were outstanding. During my career I did several hundred facelifts and did them exactly the same way every time.I got faster, more precise, and there were fewer and fewer wasted movements. My patients thought I was an artist. But the truth was that I was more of a robot than an artist. I am the least artistic person I know.This experience of mastery was profound for me. I felt like I had discovered a larger secret in the process of being a good facelift surgeon. The secret was that you could master just about anything if you cracked the code and did it over and over again the same way every time. That's all that mastery really is.My guest on this week's Wealth Formula Podcast is special. At a relatively young age, she has become a master at her craft and has shown the same kind of consistency with her financial outcomes as I did at my peak with surgical outcomes.Her name is Janet LePage and she is computer scientist who has cracked the code to successful multifamily real estate investing. In this episode, we will learn how she did it.BuckP.S. Don't forget to sign up for our upcoming Wealth Formula Investor Meetup in Scottsdale, AZ. Click here to learn more! Janet Lepage's background Cracking the code then sticking to it Velocity and leverage Have a lot of lemons to squeeze Affordability index Caring = profitability The We Got You Back program
        51 min
      • 139: Ask Buck New Year’s Edition!

        You know it’s been a hell of a year in terms of market volatility right? Now, in cryptocurrency, we expect that. It is a speculative asset class with binary outcomes. That’s why we only invest money in money that we can lose. In 2018, we definitely lost it (who knows about 2019).

        But the equity markets are supposed to be where you put your retirement money! Whats up with the volatility? December has been the worst month in the stock market since 2008 and could very well be the worst December since 1932 during the Great Depression.

        Why? Because the fed raised rates by one quarter of one percent? Because there is a government shut down over a border wall? Why do these seemingly unrelated circumstances affect your publicly traded equities?

        The answer…your wealth in the stock market is not real. When people get nervous and there is a sell off in the market, your wealth vanishes. Investing in the stock market is not conservative as conventional financial wisdom has led you to believe. It gives you exposure to systemic risk that you cannot control.

        Now I know some of you skeptics out there will say yeah Buck the real estate market is not an uncorrelated asset either. That’s absolutely true but here is the difference.

        You see, the money I have tied up in real estate is real. How do I know that? Well, I can see, touch, and feel an apartment building. And people have to live somewhere so they keep paying if they need a roof over their head. People sell stocks so they can pay their rent.

        As for the value of the building. Maybe it will go down in value for a period of time but if I’m making money from the asset now, why do I even care? I’ll just cash flow for a few years and when the value goes back up, maybe I’ll sell (or maybe not).

        These are not new concepts for this show but worth repeating because I am sensing panic out there with stock market investors and I am getting a lot of questions about where to invest or where to hold cash.

        Rather than be foolish and give you financial advice, let me point out that my own strategy continues to be to buy moderately leveraged real estate with value add opportunities in high growth markets (Dallas, Houston, Phoenix, Atlanta). If you are an accredited investor and you want to know exactly what I’m up to, join investor club ASAP and you can decide if you want to do the same.

        As for where to keep cash, I’ll say it again. There is only one vehicle that I know that continued to provide solid positive compounding growth and liquidity through the Civil War, the Great Depression, and the Great Recession. It’s called Wealth Formula Banking and, in my opinion, this is the best risk adjusted long term investment ever.

        If you are tired of feeling queasy not knowing which way the market is turning, it may be time to really take a look at this option. 

        I think we are in for some serious volatility in the next year. That said, I do not believe that we are headed for another 2008 right now. The biggest problem we have right now is that rates are normalizing (although mortgage rates remain low) and there is a tremendous amount of political uncertainty. The markets hate uncertainty.

        Sitting on cash in an almost certain inflationary environment may not be in your best interests either. That guarantees you lose money as inflation exceeds the nominal interest you are earning at the bank.

        Markets go up and down even though in good times we never seem to remember that. It doesn’t mean we freeze. It means we make decisions based on what is in front of us. In this week’s episode of Ask Buck, we touch on these topics and more.

        Start out the year with some Wealth Formula Wisdom. Don’t miss this episode.

        46 min
      • 139: Ask Buck New Year's Edition!
        You know it's been a hell of a year in terms of market volatility right? Now, in cryptocurrency, we expect that. It is a speculative asset class with binary outcomes. That's why we only invest money in money that we can lose. In 2018, we definitely lost it (who knows about 2019). But the equity markets are supposed to be where you put your retirement money! Whats up with the volatility? December has been the worst month in the stock market since 2008 and could very well be the worst December since 1932 during the Great Depression. Why? Because the fed raised rates by one quarter of one percent? Because there is a government shut down over a border wall? Why do these seemingly unrelated circumstances affect your publicly traded equities? The answer…your wealth in the stock market is not real. When people get nervous and there is a sell off in the market, your wealth vanishes. Investing in the stock market is not conservative as conventional financial wisdom has led you to believe. It gives you exposure to systemic risk that you cannot control. Now I know some of you skeptics out there will say yeah Buck the real estate market is not an uncorrelated asset either. That's absolutely true but here is the difference. You see, the money I have tied up in real estate is real. How do I know that? Well, I can see, touch, and feel an apartment building. And people have to live somewhere so they keep paying if they need a roof over their head. People sell stocks so they can pay their rent. As for the value of the building. Maybe it will go down in value for a period of time but if I'm making money from the asset now, why do I even care? I'll just cash flow for a few years and when the value goes back up, maybe I'll sell (or maybe not). These are not new concepts for this show but worth repeating because I am sensing panic out there with stock market investors and I am getting a lot of questions about where to invest or where to hold cash. Rather than be foolish and give you financial advice, let me point out that my own strategy continues to be to buy moderately leveraged real estate with value add opportunities in high growth markets (Dallas, Houston, Phoenix, Atlanta). If you are an accredited investor and you want to know exactly what I'm up to, join investor club ASAP and you can decide if you want to do the same. As for where to keep cash, I'll say it again. There is only one vehicle that I know that continued to provide solid positive compounding growth and liquidity through the Civil War, the Great Depression, and the Great Recession. It's called Wealth Formula Banking and, in my opinion, this is the best risk adjusted long term investment ever. If you are tired of feeling queasy not knowing which way the market is turning, it may be time to really take a look at this option. I think we are in for some serious volatility in the next year. That said, I do not believe that we are headed for another 2008 right now. The biggest problem we have right now is that rates are normalizing (although mortgage rates remain low) and there is a tremendous amount of political uncertainty. The markets hate uncertainty. Sitting on cash in an almost certain inflationary environment may not be in your best interests either. That guarantees you lose money as inflation exceeds the nominal interest you are earning at the bank. Markets go up and down even though in good times we never seem to remember that. It doesn't mean we freeze. It means we make decisions based on what is in front of us. In this week's episode of Ask Buck, we touch on these topics and more. Start out the year with some Wealth Formula Wisdom. Don't miss this episode.
        46 min

      About Wealth Formula Podcast

      From the publisher's feed

      Financial Education and Entrepreneurship for Professionals

      More shows like Wealth Formula Podcast

      BiggerPockets Real Estate Podcast by BiggerPockets

      BiggerPockets Real Estate Podcast

      16,681 Listeners

      The Peter Schiff Show Podcast by Peter Schiff

      The Peter Schiff Show Podcast

      5,689 Listeners

      The Real Estate Guys Radio Show - Real Estate Investing Education for Effective Action by The Real Estate Guys

      The Real Estate Guys Radio Show - Real Estate Investing Education for Effective Action

      701 Listeners

      Rich Dad Radio Show: In-Your-Face Advice on Investing, Personal Finance, & Starting a Business by The Rich Dad Media Network

      Rich Dad Radio Show: In-Your-Face Advice on Investing, Personal Finance, & Starting a Business

      3,836 Listeners

      Creating Wealth Real Estate Investing with Jason Hartman by Jason Hartman

      Creating Wealth Real Estate Investing with Jason Hartman

      535 Listeners

      Get Rich Education by Real Estate Investing with Keith Weinhold

      Get Rich Education

      597 Listeners

      Main Street Business by Mark J Kohler and Mat Sorensen

      Main Street Business

      588 Listeners

      Passive Real Estate Investing by Real Estate Investing with Marco Santarelli, Investor and Entrepreneur.

      Passive Real Estate Investing

      962 Listeners

      Real Wealth Show: Real Estate Investing Podcast by Kathy Fettke / RealWealth

      Real Wealth Show: Real Estate Investing Podcast

      409 Listeners

      Tax Smart Real Estate Investors Podcast by Hall CPA

      Tax Smart Real Estate Investors Podcast

      423 Listeners

      The WealthAbility Show with Tom Wheelwright, CPA by The Rich Dad Media Network

      The WealthAbility Show with Tom Wheelwright, CPA

      508 Listeners

      Real Estate News: Real Estate Investing Podcast by Kathy Fettke / RealWealth

      Real Estate News: Real Estate Investing Podcast

      556 Listeners

      Ken McElroy Show by Ken McElroy

      Ken McElroy Show

      701 Listeners

      Rebel Capitalist News by George Gammon

      Rebel Capitalist News

      1,026 Listeners

      PassivePockets: The Passive Real Estate Investing Show by PassivePockets, Chris Lopez

      PassivePockets: The Passive Real Estate Investing Show

      131 Listeners