
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
One of the most exciting things about being an art journalist is that art as a subject is ridiculously protean: what it looks like is always changing, how we engage with it is always changing, and the role it plays in society is always changing too.
What that means is that you constantly need to shift your perspective in order to see it properly.
Searching for the correct lens on art, if you’re really good and really lucky, sometimes you even get to name that lens, like Pop Art, for instance. Artnet News’s national art critic Ben Davis has written an essay that illuminates a recent shift in art that has been making big waves among the cognoscenti. It’s a new tendency that he calls quantitative aesthetics, and this week he joins Andrew Goldstein on the Art Angle podcast to discuss it.
4.7
300300 ratings
One of the most exciting things about being an art journalist is that art as a subject is ridiculously protean: what it looks like is always changing, how we engage with it is always changing, and the role it plays in society is always changing too.
What that means is that you constantly need to shift your perspective in order to see it properly.
Searching for the correct lens on art, if you’re really good and really lucky, sometimes you even get to name that lens, like Pop Art, for instance. Artnet News’s national art critic Ben Davis has written an essay that illuminates a recent shift in art that has been making big waves among the cognoscenti. It’s a new tendency that he calls quantitative aesthetics, and this week he joins Andrew Goldstein on the Art Angle podcast to discuss it.
291 Listeners
475 Listeners
861 Listeners
800 Listeners
151 Listeners
200 Listeners
396 Listeners
224 Listeners
483 Listeners
725 Listeners
520 Listeners
141 Listeners
140 Listeners
594 Listeners
560 Listeners