
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Today, we offer the full case against anchor-baby jurisprudence. I’m joined by Amy Swearer, senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation, who has written scholarly papers showing conclusively that the plain meaning of the 14th Amendment was not adopting unqualified birthright citizenship for foreigners and most certainly not for illegal aliens and temporary visitors. The entire philosophy of citizenship, both pre- and post-adoption of the 14th Amendment, was built upon consent and allegiance. Amy explains why Wong Kim Ark expresses a false view of history but at the same time is clear that birthright citizenship cannot apply to those here against the national consent.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
By Blaze Podcast Network4.8
34723,472 ratings
Today, we offer the full case against anchor-baby jurisprudence. I’m joined by Amy Swearer, senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation, who has written scholarly papers showing conclusively that the plain meaning of the 14th Amendment was not adopting unqualified birthright citizenship for foreigners and most certainly not for illegal aliens and temporary visitors. The entire philosophy of citizenship, both pre- and post-adoption of the 14th Amendment, was built upon consent and allegiance. Amy explains why Wong Kim Ark expresses a false view of history but at the same time is clear that birthright citizenship cannot apply to those here against the national consent.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

23,471 Listeners

26,261 Listeners

37,625 Listeners

14,245 Listeners

62,908 Listeners

10,421 Listeners

4,782 Listeners

21,011 Listeners

28,418 Listeners

5,851 Listeners

301 Listeners

24,760 Listeners

17,076 Listeners

5,585 Listeners

6,588 Listeners

44,119 Listeners

3,139 Listeners

4,341 Listeners

9,006 Listeners

625 Listeners

307 Listeners