
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Today, we offer the full case against anchor-baby jurisprudence. I’m joined by Amy Swearer, senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation, who has written scholarly papers showing conclusively that the plain meaning of the 14th Amendment was not adopting unqualified birthright citizenship for foreigners and most certainly not for illegal aliens and temporary visitors. The entire philosophy of citizenship, both pre- and post-adoption of the 14th Amendment, was built upon consent and allegiance. Amy explains why Wong Kim Ark expresses a false view of history but at the same time is clear that birthright citizenship cannot apply to those here against the national consent.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
4.8
34603,460 ratings
Today, we offer the full case against anchor-baby jurisprudence. I’m joined by Amy Swearer, senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation, who has written scholarly papers showing conclusively that the plain meaning of the 14th Amendment was not adopting unqualified birthright citizenship for foreigners and most certainly not for illegal aliens and temporary visitors. The entire philosophy of citizenship, both pre- and post-adoption of the 14th Amendment, was built upon consent and allegiance. Amy explains why Wong Kim Ark expresses a false view of history but at the same time is clear that birthright citizenship cannot apply to those here against the national consent.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
23,454 Listeners
10,298 Listeners
25,498 Listeners
37,360 Listeners
62,996 Listeners
14,177 Listeners
4,754 Listeners
20,206 Listeners
5,848 Listeners
299 Listeners
24,563 Listeners
1,152 Listeners
17,063 Listeners
5,572 Listeners
6,510 Listeners
44,057 Listeners
3,080 Listeners
2,484 Listeners
4,340 Listeners
610 Listeners
5,908 Listeners
272 Listeners
797 Listeners