
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
The case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization — which the Supreme Court will hear this term — offers the cleanest opportunity since 1973 for the Court to revisit its abortion jurisprudence. A review of that jurisprudence shows that, regardless of anyone’s views of abortion itself, basic fidelity to the Constitution and the rule of law demands it be overturned. Guest Carter Snead joins us to make the constitutional, legal, and moral case for rejecting the Court’s abortion precedents.
O. Carter Snead is professor of law at the Notre Dame Law School and director of the de Nicola Center for Ethics and Culture at the University of Notre Dame.
This podcast discusses themes from Carter’s and Mary Ann Glendon’s essay in the Fall 2021 issue of National Affairs, “The Case for Overturning Roe.”
4.6
4141 ratings
The case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization — which the Supreme Court will hear this term — offers the cleanest opportunity since 1973 for the Court to revisit its abortion jurisprudence. A review of that jurisprudence shows that, regardless of anyone’s views of abortion itself, basic fidelity to the Constitution and the rule of law demands it be overturned. Guest Carter Snead joins us to make the constitutional, legal, and moral case for rejecting the Court’s abortion precedents.
O. Carter Snead is professor of law at the Notre Dame Law School and director of the de Nicola Center for Ethics and Culture at the University of Notre Dame.
This podcast discusses themes from Carter’s and Mary Ann Glendon’s essay in the Fall 2021 issue of National Affairs, “The Case for Overturning Roe.”
623 Listeners
211 Listeners
696 Listeners
1,832 Listeners
129 Listeners
989 Listeners
4,867 Listeners
688 Listeners
6,549 Listeners
2,019 Listeners
2,844 Listeners
17 Listeners
635 Listeners
3,856 Listeners
3,303 Listeners
18 Listeners
697 Listeners
28 Listeners
18 Listeners
23 Listeners
442 Listeners
37 Listeners
1,052 Listeners