
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this discussion, I sit down with data veterans Remco Broekmans and Marco Wobben to explore why so many data projects fail. They argue that the problem isn't the technology, but a fundamental misunderstanding of communication, culture, and long-term strategy.The conversation goes deep into the critical shift from being a "hardcore techie" to focusing on translating business needs into data models. They use the classic "involved party" data modeling pattern as a prime example of how abstract IT jargon creates a massive disconnect with the business.Marco shares a fascinating (and surprising) case study of the Dutch Railroad organization, which has been engaged in an 18-year information modeling "program" - not a project - to manage its immense complexity. This sparks a deep dive into the cultural and work-ethic differences between the US and Europe, contrasting the American short-term, ROI-driven "project" mindset with the European capacity for long-term, foundational "programs".Finally, they tackle the role of AI. Is it a silver bullet or just the latest shiny object? They conclude that AI's best use is as an "intern" or "assistant", a tool to brainstorm, ask questions, and handle initial prototyping, but never as a replacement for the deep, human-centric work of understanding a business.Timestamps:00:00 - Introduction01:09 - Marco Wobben introduces his 25-year journey in information modeling.01:56 - Remco Broekmans reintroduces himself and his focus on the communication aspect of data.03:22 - The progression from hardcore techie to focusing on communication over technology.08:16 - Why is communication in data and IT projects so difficult? 09:49 - The "Involved Party" Problem: A perfect example of where IT communication goes wrong with the business.13:35 - The essence of IT is automating the communication that happens on the business side.18:39 - Discussing a client with 20,000 distinct business terms in their information model.21:55 - The story of the Dutch Railroad's 18-year information modeling program that reduced incident response from 4 hours to 2 seconds.27:25 - Project vs. Program: A key mindset difference between the US and Europe.34:18 - The danger of chasing shiny new tools like AI without getting the fundamentals right first.39:55 - Where does AI fit into the world of data modeling? 43:34 - Why you can't trust AI to be the expert, especially with specialized business jargon.47:18 - The role of risk in trusting AI, using a self-driving car analogy.53:27 - Cultural differences in work pressure and ethics between the US and the Netherlands.59:29 - Why personality and communication skills are more important than a PhD for data modelers.01:03:38 - What is the purpose of an AI-run company with no human benefit? 01:11:21 - Using AI as an instructive tool to improve your own skills, not just to get an answer.01:14:12 - How AI can be used as a "sidekick" to ask dumb questions and help you think.01:18:00 - Where to find Marco and Remco online
By Joe Reis5
1717 ratings
In this discussion, I sit down with data veterans Remco Broekmans and Marco Wobben to explore why so many data projects fail. They argue that the problem isn't the technology, but a fundamental misunderstanding of communication, culture, and long-term strategy.The conversation goes deep into the critical shift from being a "hardcore techie" to focusing on translating business needs into data models. They use the classic "involved party" data modeling pattern as a prime example of how abstract IT jargon creates a massive disconnect with the business.Marco shares a fascinating (and surprising) case study of the Dutch Railroad organization, which has been engaged in an 18-year information modeling "program" - not a project - to manage its immense complexity. This sparks a deep dive into the cultural and work-ethic differences between the US and Europe, contrasting the American short-term, ROI-driven "project" mindset with the European capacity for long-term, foundational "programs".Finally, they tackle the role of AI. Is it a silver bullet or just the latest shiny object? They conclude that AI's best use is as an "intern" or "assistant", a tool to brainstorm, ask questions, and handle initial prototyping, but never as a replacement for the deep, human-centric work of understanding a business.Timestamps:00:00 - Introduction01:09 - Marco Wobben introduces his 25-year journey in information modeling.01:56 - Remco Broekmans reintroduces himself and his focus on the communication aspect of data.03:22 - The progression from hardcore techie to focusing on communication over technology.08:16 - Why is communication in data and IT projects so difficult? 09:49 - The "Involved Party" Problem: A perfect example of where IT communication goes wrong with the business.13:35 - The essence of IT is automating the communication that happens on the business side.18:39 - Discussing a client with 20,000 distinct business terms in their information model.21:55 - The story of the Dutch Railroad's 18-year information modeling program that reduced incident response from 4 hours to 2 seconds.27:25 - Project vs. Program: A key mindset difference between the US and Europe.34:18 - The danger of chasing shiny new tools like AI without getting the fundamentals right first.39:55 - Where does AI fit into the world of data modeling? 43:34 - Why you can't trust AI to be the expert, especially with specialized business jargon.47:18 - The role of risk in trusting AI, using a self-driving car analogy.53:27 - Cultural differences in work pressure and ethics between the US and the Netherlands.59:29 - Why personality and communication skills are more important than a PhD for data modelers.01:03:38 - What is the purpose of an AI-run company with no human benefit? 01:11:21 - Using AI as an instructive tool to improve your own skills, not just to get an answer.01:14:12 - How AI can be used as a "sidekick" to ask dumb questions and help you think.01:18:00 - Where to find Marco and Remco online

172 Listeners

291 Listeners

624 Listeners

588 Listeners

1,830 Listeners

301 Listeners

608 Listeners

214 Listeners

146 Listeners

231 Listeners

268 Listeners

141 Listeners

131 Listeners

97 Listeners

1,042 Listeners