
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Nathan and Ben kick off this week’s episode with a logical reasoning question and explain their two-step strategy for identifying a flaw. They hear from an August LSAT taker about an overly officious proctor. Then, they evaluate four more personal statements. It’s the time of year when many students are getting their law school applications ready and asking for advice. Today’s featured statements are better written than most but still lacking in relevant content. Spoiler: Law schools probably don’t want to hear a story about feral cats. Read more on our website!
Watch Episode 313 on YouTube
By Nathan Fox and Ben Olson4.6
877877 ratings
Nathan and Ben kick off this week’s episode with a logical reasoning question and explain their two-step strategy for identifying a flaw. They hear from an August LSAT taker about an overly officious proctor. Then, they evaluate four more personal statements. It’s the time of year when many students are getting their law school applications ready and asking for advice. Today’s featured statements are better written than most but still lacking in relevant content. Spoiler: Law schools probably don’t want to hear a story about feral cats. Read more on our website!
Watch Episode 313 on YouTube

375 Listeners

478 Listeners

513 Listeners

111 Listeners

173 Listeners

63 Listeners

78 Listeners

173 Listeners

28 Listeners

5 Listeners

18 Listeners

34 Listeners

20 Listeners

11 Listeners