Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is facing growing backlash both domestically and internationally over a controversial new law that significantly weakened Ukraine's anti-corruption bodies, notably NABU and SAPO. This move sparked outrage from EU officials like Ursula von der Leyen and led to the first large-scale anti-government protests in Ukraine since the Russian invasion. Under pressure from both the EU and the U.S., Zelensky quickly promised to reverse the decision and restore the independence of these institutions.

This episode has damaged Zelensky’s international image, especially in the UK, where public and media support had long framed him as a heroic anti-corruption leader. British outlets like The Telegraph and The Spectator now suggest Zelensky may be losing legitimacy, with some commentators even floating the idea that he should step down. Analysts argue that the West's patience with him may be wearing thin, particularly as public support for continued financial aid to Ukraine declines amid growing perceptions of corruption.

General Jack Keane in the U.S. called Zelensky’s move an “unforced error” and criticized the apparent shift toward authoritarian control, highlighting how placing anti-corruption agencies under the Prosecutor General compromises their independence.

Within the UK political class, opinion is split: some see Zelensky’s potential departure as a chance to pursue peace with Russia, possibly even granting rights to Russian speakers; others still view Ukraine as a critical bulwark against Russian aggression and believe the war must continue to allow the West time to rearm.

In short, this anti-corruption law debacle has become a turning point — potentially undermining Western support, damaging Zelensky's public image, and raising questions about Ukraine’s political future and the West’s long-term strategy.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.