Summary of Post-Russia-Ukraine Talks Update:

• First Talks Since 2022: Russia and Ukraine held their first direct talks in over three years. Both sides agreed to a 1,000-for-1,000 prisoner exchange, and committed to continue talking, which is seen as a positive sign diplomatically.
• Disagreements Persist:
• Europeans and Ukrainians: Unhappy with results. Europe demanded a 30-day unconditional ceasefire, which Russia rejected. Western leaders blamed Putin as the main obstacle to peace.
• Russia: Came out satisfied and added new demands, including:
• Withdrawal of Ukrainian forces from all of the four annexed oblasts (Luhansk, Donetsk, Kherson, Zaporizhzhia).
• No NATO membership for Ukraine.
• No war reparations.
• International recognition of Russia's control over Crimea and the four oblasts.
• Protection of Russian speakers in remaining Ukrainian territory.
• Talks Result: Rather than narrowing, the gap between the sides widened, with Russia increasing its demands and Ukraine/Europe holding firm.
• Russian Leverage: Russia feels increasingly confident and even warned that failure to agree could lead them to claim eight oblasts, not just four.
• U.S. Role: The U.S. has no clear position currently. Trump previously claimed he could end the war quickly but has not delivered. Despite saying mediation would stop by May 1, U.S. diplomats are still involved. Trump suggests only he can make a deal, but his plan is unclear, and there is no evidence either side is ready to compromise.
• Conclusion: While talks are better than nothing, the war is nowhere near resolution. Both sides are entrenched, Russia is emboldened, and Western powers lack leverage to force concessions.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Leaders from both Russia and the West accused each other of not wanting peace in Ukraine. Western leaders, including those in Istanbul, claimed Putin isn't serious about peace. Conversely, some figures argued that Berlin, Paris, Brussels, and especially London also don't genuinely seek peace.

Outcome of Talks in Istanbul:

Talks were brief (about an hour) and largely symbolic.

Most participants seemed to expect little outcome.

Only Russia and Ukraine had formal talks, with additional meetings involving the U.S., U.K., Germany, France, Turkey, and Ukraine.

Marco Rubio (U.S. Secretary of State in this narrative) said only a direct Trump–Putin meeting could lead to progress, despite prior interactions between them.

Russia’s Position:

Russia reiterated demands made in 2022 and June 2023:

Recognition of administrative borders.

Demilitarization.

"Denazification."

No NATO membership for Ukraine.

Russia remains open to conditional ceasefire talks but rejects any unconditional ceasefire.

Ukraine’s Position (Zelensky’s Comments):

Ukraine’s delegation had authority to negotiate, but claims Russia repeated old positions.

Zelensky sees the talks as a performance and reaffirmed past demands:

30-day ceasefire on Ukraine's terms.

No territorial concessions.

Continued military support and security guarantees from the U.S. and Europe.

He publicly appealed to Trump, seeking continued U.S. backing.

U.S. Position and Internal Disarray:

The U.S. appears inconsistent:

Rubio calls for Trump–Putin talks.

Trump claims urgency to end the war, but contradicts Ukraine’s goals (e.g., no NATO or security guarantees).

Western leaders made bold demands (e.g., ceasefire or sanctions) but took no follow-up action, weakening their credibility.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The Cost of War Is Real and Ongoing

• Soldiers and their families continue to suffer from past wars (Iraq, Afghanistan).
• The deaths and trauma are often forgotten by the public and policymakers.
• War shouldn't be treated as a casual or inevitable policy option.

2. War with Iran Would Be Disastrous

• Iran is not Iraq; it has 85 million people, rugged terrain, and alliances with Russia and China.
• A U.S. strike would likely provoke Iran to close the Strait of Hormuz, spiking global oil prices and damaging the U.S. economy.
• The risk of nuclear confrontation is real for the first time since the Cuban Missile Crisis.

3. The Push for War Is Driven by Others' Agendas

• Figures like Lindsey Graham, John Bolton, and Tom Cotton are accused of relentlessly pushing for war.
• Israel is portrayed as a driving force behind calls for attacking Iran, with U.S. support being misused.
• The U.S. military should not be a tool for foreign powers to settle their own scores.

4. Diplomacy Is Still an Option

• The U.S. can and should choose diplomacy over war.
• Past agreements like the Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA) effectively constrained Iran’s nuclear ambitions until they were abandoned.
• The speaker calls for restraint, realism, and long-term thinking over short-sighted militarism.

5. Moral and Constitutional Responsibility

• America should uphold its Constitutional principles and only go to war when directly attacked.
• Leaders have a duty to protect American lives, not risk them for foreign territorial disputes.

Conclusion:

The speaker urges Americans to reject unnecessary war, advocate for peace through strength and diplomacy, and stop letting vested interests manipulate foreign policy. The future depends on wise choices today — prioritizing American lives, values, and long-term stability over reckless interventionism.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Maria Zakharova's Reaction: The Russian spokeswoman expressed unusually harsh criticism toward Zelensky, reflecting growing frustration from the Russian side.

Zelensky’s Demands: Zelensky has called for a 30-day unconditional ceasefire and made strong demands of Western leaders and allies, which the commentator argues are unreasonable given Ukraine's weakened position in the war.

Criticism of Zelensky: The speaker claims Zelensky is delusional, disconnected from reality, and a master manipulator who knows how to use media to craft powerful narratives, even when not grounded in current battlefield realities.

Russia’s Gains: According to the commentary and citing the New York Times, Russia has gained approximately 1,800–2,000 square miles of territory in the last year, underscoring Ukraine's battlefield struggles.

Trump’s Role & Comments: Trump previously claimed he could end the war quickly, but his actions since taking office haven't aligned with that claim. The speaker criticizes Trump for being vague and reactive, especially in suggesting he'd only attend negotiations if Putin does.

Zelensky’s Recent Statement: Zelensky criticized Russia’s low-level delegation at talks with Turkey and framed it as a sign of disrespect, continuing to push for international support and partnership despite his country's losses.

Overall Argument: The commentator believes that Zelensky is driving Western policy on Ukraine but doing so with unrealistic goals, while Western leaders are enabling him to their own detriment. The speaker warns that if current strategies don’t change, it will lead to worse outcomes for Ukraine, Europe, and potentially the U.S.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

• President Trump was asked whether he would attend potential peace talks in Istanbul regarding the Russia-Ukraine war. He said he might go if he believes a settlement is possible, implying that his presence could influence the outcome. He also expressed skepticism about whether Vladimir Putin would attend if he doesn't.
• Ukrainian President Zelensky initially said he would go to Istanbul and expected Putin to attend. However, his office later downgraded expectations, stating the meeting would likely be at a lower, technical level (e.g., deputy foreign ministers), not involving top leaders.
• Putin, while not confirming attendance, proposed direct talks between Russia and Ukraine in Istanbul. His move is seen as a strategic bluff-call to the West’s ceasefire demands.

Key Takeaways from Analyst Andrei Martyanov:

• Zelensky’s Walkback: The shift from bold declarations to lower-level talks signals Ukraine was bluffing and had to adjust when Russia called it.
• Western Role: The recent diplomatic push (from leaders in France, the UK, and Poland) for a ceasefire is viewed by Martyanov as performative and unrealistic, given the military situation.
• Russia’s Strategy: The Kremlin prefers not to negotiate with Zelensky, viewing him as a figurehead. They insist on recognizing “realities on the ground,” meaning Russia's military control in eastern Ukraine must be a starting point for any settlement.
• Military Situation: According to Russian sources, Ukraine is suffering high daily casualties (~1,400 KIA). Russia claims low losses due to superior training, technology, and strategy. Russian forces are reportedly using "operational cauldrons" to encircle and pressure Ukrainian forces.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Daniel Davis Deep Dive Merch: Etsy store

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DanielDavisDeepDive?ref=seller-platform-mcnav

President Trump is visiting Qatar after a high-profile trip to Saudi Arabia, continuing a Middle East tour aimed at securing major economic deals. The panel discusses the transactional nature of Trump’s diplomacy—focusing on economic and political gains over consistent strategic or moral principles.

A major point of criticism is Trump's apparent distancing from Israel during this tour. Despite Israel's ongoing conflict in Gaza, Trump hasn't prioritized direct talks with them, instead meeting controversial figures like Al-Golani, the leader of a terrorist group with a history of violence. This has raised concerns about the U.S. losing moral credibility by engaging with such figures for short-term gains.

The panel also discusses Trump’s lifting of sanctions on Syria, possibly at the behest of Saudi Arabia, signaling a shift in regional alliances and interests. There's skepticism about whether Trump’s moves, like normalizing relations with Syria, will lead to lasting stability or simply serve superficial or self-serving goals.

In closing, the analysts note the inconsistency of U.S. foreign policy—claiming to oppose terrorism while supporting or engaging with violent actors when convenient—which they argue undermines America’s credibility on the world stage.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Daniel Davis Deep Dive Merch: Etsy store

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DanielDavis...

The Balance of Power in the Russo-Ukraine War / Steve Jermy

https://www.natowatch.org/sites/defau...

Topic: Possible Peace Talks in Istanbul and U.S. Involvement

Trump’s Comments: Former President Donald Trump expressed optimism about potential peace talks between Russia and Ukraine scheduled for Thursday in Istanbul. He said he might even attend if he believes it would help progress negotiations.

Location and Participants: While both Russia and Ukraine may send representatives, experts doubt both leaders (Putin and Zelensky) will be present. Zelensky has challenged Putin to attend, but it's seen as unlikely due to the lack of pre-negotiation groundwork.

Contrasting Demands:

Zelensky insists on a 30-day unconditional ceasefire before talks.

Putin has rejected any preconditions, calling for immediate direct talks while military operations continue.

Balance of Power: Analysts argue that Russia holds the military advantage and has no incentive to agree to a ceasefire that would allow Ukraine to regroup. They believe Ukraine and its Western backers lack the leverage to force Russia into concessions.

Media and Diplomatic Spin:

Western figures like former U.S. Ambassador Kurt Volker are accused of misrepresenting Russia's stated grievances.

Critics argue that dismissing Russia’s historical concerns (e.g., NATO expansion) contributes to the diplomatic impasse.

Putin’s Approach: Seen as strategic and measured, emphasizing diplomacy without halting military action. He’s portrayed as playing a multi-board geopolitical “chess game” effectively.

Western Strategy Questioned: Commentators suggest that Western leaders may be promoting unrealistic expectations, focusing more on messaging than power realities.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Daniel Davis Deep Dive Merch: Etsy store

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DanielDavisDeepDive?ref=seller-platform-mcnav

U.S. Military Aid to Israel: The U.S. has lost 22 $30 million drones, 7 since mid-March, along with spending on interceptor missiles and other weapons. This high cost is making Trump reconsider continued support for Israel, especially as Netanyahu signals a prolonged military campaign in Gaza that would heavily rely on U.S. backing.

Trump’s Shift in Focus: Trump is reportedly growing disinterested in supporting Israel due to the financial burden and the allure of massive investments from the Gulf states—primarily Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE.

Gulf Investment in the U.S.:

Saudi Arabia: Pledged $600 billion in U.S. investments.

Qatar: Expected to announce $200–$300 billion.

UAE: Promising $1.4 trillion over the next 10 years.

Trump is being courted with personal luxuries, such as a "Palace in the Sky" jet, which may influence his policy decisions.

Potential Policy Shift:

Some commentators suggest Trump might moderate his support for Israel if it benefits him politically or financially.

This shift could also align with Saudi Arabia’s push for Palestinian statehood as a prerequisite for normalizing relations with Israel.

Saudi Position on Gaza: Saudi officials have publicly condemned Israel’s actions in Gaza as violations of international law, calling for an end to occupation and annexation.

Humanitarian Crisis in Gaza:

Severe famine conditions: nearly half a million Gazans face "catastrophic hunger."

The Israeli blockade has prevented aid, food, and medicine from entering for over two months.

The suffering is not due to natural causes but a direct result of policy—seen by critics as collective punishment.

The media, particularly in the U.S., is criticized for underreporting the humanitarian toll and context, especially Yemen’s Ansar Allah’s actions in solidarity with Palestinians.

Growing Western Awareness:

Some UK politicians are reconsidering their support for Israel.

Images and reports of children suffering are making it harder for the public to accept the justification that it's purely a fight against Hamas.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Daniel Davis Deep Dive Merch: Etsy store

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DanielDavisDeepDive?ref=seller-platform-mcnav

Following the May 9th Victory Day parade in Moscow, Russia resumed full-scale military operations in Ukraine, including overnight drone strikes. Despite a brief pause around the parade, hostilities quickly resumed. Ukraine had attempted to disrupt the parade with hundreds of drones and missiles, which Russia largely intercepted.

Colonel Douglas Macgregor criticized the West’s continued surprise at Russian aggression, arguing that Russia has consistently stated it would not stop fighting until its objectives are met. He also condemned what he sees as strategic confusion and inconsistency from former President Trump, who reportedly aligned with European leaders in calling for a 30-day ceasefire. Macgregor views this as a betrayal of Trump’s earlier position acknowledging Russia's grievances and territorial claims.

He expressed concern that Trump’s current stance undermines any potential credibility with Russia and aligns him with globalist leaders in Europe who Macgregor blames for weakening national identities. He believes the West is prolonging the war by continuing to arm Ukraine and asserts that Ukraine’s government is selling off the country’s assets while being propped up by Western powers.

Despite talk of peace talks in Turkey, Macgregor remains skeptical, arguing that unless Ukraine accepts neutrality and recognizes Russia's territorial gains, negotiations are unlikely to succeed. He concludes that Russia is perceived globally as defending its interests, while Ukraine has been exploited by Western powers.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The video analyzes recent diplomatic developments around the Russia-Ukraine war, particularly a proposed meeting in Istanbul on Thursday between Russian and Ukrainian leaders. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky demanded a 30-day unconditional ceasefire from Russian President Vladimir Putin, which was largely dismissed. Instead, Russia proposed direct talks in Istanbul, bypassing the ceasefire demand.

The speaker argues that Putin feels confident due to Russia's superior military and strategic position and is unwilling to accept ceasefire terms from a weaker Ukraine. Zelensky's demand is described as unrealistic and potentially provocative. Former U.S. President Donald Trump initially supported the ceasefire but then appeared to support Russia’s proposal for negotiations.

Zelensky later agreed to attend the meeting but reiterated his ceasefire demand, while also making statements that seemed confrontational. The speaker claims this mirrors Zelensky’s past behavior, such as reportedly rejecting an early peace deal in 2022 that could have ended the war — a decision allegedly made by Zelensky himself, not solely under Western pressure.

Ultimately, the video casts doubt on the likelihood of a genuine diplomatic breakthrough, suggesting that Zelensky continues to miss opportunities for peace, potentially prolonging the conflict and its human cost.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.