
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Send us a text
What does the FDA jurisdiction for LDTs mean for the labs? Do they need to worry? How do they need to change the way they operate?
In this episode, I talk with Dr. Thomas Nifong, a clinical pathologist and VP of CDX operations at Acrovan Therapeutics, about the recent FDA ruling on laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) issued on May 6th, 2024. We discuss the implications of considering LDTs as medical devices, requiring regulation, and explore the authority of FDA versus CLIA. The conversation also covers historical contexts, practical implications of regulatory changes, and the roles of organizations like CAP, ACLA, and AMP in legal challenges against the FDA. We dive into the differences in requirements between CLIA and FDA, New York's alternative approval route, and potential impacts on lab operations and compliance. Join us for an insightful conversation filled with essential information for those in the field of molecular pathology.
00:00 Introduction and Special Guest Announcement
00:24 FDA's New Rule on Laboratory Developed Tests (LDTs)
01:58 Recording the Podcast: A Casual Lunch Conversation
03:47 Understanding FDA's Authority Over Medical Devices
08:07 Disputes and Legal Challenges
12:03 Practical Implications and Industry Reactions
12:47 Understanding FDA's Focus: Safety and Efficacy
14:11 The Role of CMS and Medical Necessity
14:48 Congressional Involvement and Legal Authority
16:06 Impact on Labs and Future LDTs
18:33 Quality Systems and Compliance
20:16 Modifications and Software Updates
21:16 Conclusion and Next Steps
Support the show
Get the "Digital Pathology 101" FREE E-book and join us!
By Aleksandra Zuraw, DVM, PhD5
77 ratings
Send us a text
What does the FDA jurisdiction for LDTs mean for the labs? Do they need to worry? How do they need to change the way they operate?
In this episode, I talk with Dr. Thomas Nifong, a clinical pathologist and VP of CDX operations at Acrovan Therapeutics, about the recent FDA ruling on laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) issued on May 6th, 2024. We discuss the implications of considering LDTs as medical devices, requiring regulation, and explore the authority of FDA versus CLIA. The conversation also covers historical contexts, practical implications of regulatory changes, and the roles of organizations like CAP, ACLA, and AMP in legal challenges against the FDA. We dive into the differences in requirements between CLIA and FDA, New York's alternative approval route, and potential impacts on lab operations and compliance. Join us for an insightful conversation filled with essential information for those in the field of molecular pathology.
00:00 Introduction and Special Guest Announcement
00:24 FDA's New Rule on Laboratory Developed Tests (LDTs)
01:58 Recording the Podcast: A Casual Lunch Conversation
03:47 Understanding FDA's Authority Over Medical Devices
08:07 Disputes and Legal Challenges
12:03 Practical Implications and Industry Reactions
12:47 Understanding FDA's Focus: Safety and Efficacy
14:11 The Role of CMS and Medical Necessity
14:48 Congressional Involvement and Legal Authority
16:06 Impact on Labs and Future LDTs
18:33 Quality Systems and Compliance
20:16 Modifications and Software Updates
21:16 Conclusion and Next Steps
Support the show
Get the "Digital Pathology 101" FREE E-book and join us!

26,166 Listeners

3,848 Listeners

318 Listeners

495 Listeners

764 Listeners

303 Listeners

774 Listeners

234 Listeners

325 Listeners

85 Listeners

59,393 Listeners

16 Listeners

34 Listeners

4 Listeners

19 Listeners