
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Dan and James discuss why innovation in scientific publishing is so hard, an emerging consortium peer review model, and a recent replication of the 'refilling soup bowl' study.
Other things they cover and links:
Other links
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
Citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2024, May 2) "180: Consortium peer reviews", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/24FMP
Support Everything Hertz
4.8
5555 ratings
Dan and James discuss why innovation in scientific publishing is so hard, an emerging consortium peer review model, and a recent replication of the 'refilling soup bowl' study.
Other things they cover and links:
Other links
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
Citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2024, May 2) "180: Consortium peer reviews", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/24FMP
Support Everything Hertz
1,532 Listeners
2,656 Listeners
68 Listeners
1,160 Listeners
4,144 Listeners
720 Listeners
1,547 Listeners
537 Listeners
1,291 Listeners
951 Listeners
128 Listeners
15,335 Listeners
502 Listeners
9 Listeners
315 Listeners