
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Dan and James discuss why innovation in scientific publishing is so hard, an emerging consortium peer review model, and a recent replication of the 'refilling soup bowl' study.
Other things they cover and links:
Other links
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
Citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2024, May 2) "180: Consortium peer reviews", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/24FMP
Support Everything Hertz
By Dan Quintana4.8
5555 ratings
Dan and James discuss why innovation in scientific publishing is so hard, an emerging consortium peer review model, and a recent replication of the 'refilling soup bowl' study.
Other things they cover and links:
Other links
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
Citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2024, May 2) "180: Consortium peer reviews", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/24FMP
Support Everything Hertz

32,239 Listeners

314 Listeners

9,243 Listeners

864 Listeners

428 Listeners

2,544 Listeners

113,272 Listeners

15,691 Listeners

159 Listeners

458 Listeners

1,008 Listeners

15,491 Listeners

16,489 Listeners

3,925 Listeners

13 Listeners