340B Insight wants to make our podcast the best it can be. To help us succeed, we’d like to hear your thoughts. Please take just a few minutes to complete our listener survey, and we will enter you in a drawing to win a $100 gift card! To participate, please go to 340bpodcast.org/survey.
Some of the most consequential changes for 340B this year came not from Washington D.C., but from statehouses across the country. We speak with Tom O’Donnell, senior vice president of government relations at 340B Health, to recap some of the biggest changes on the state legislative level throughout this year and to preview what might come from the states in 2026.
Seven States Enact New Reporting Laws
This year, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Ohio, Rhode Island, and Vermont have added new 340B reporting laws, increasing the list of states with such mandates to 10. O’Donnell says the first reporting requirements that Minnesota enacted in 2023 have influenced newer requirements in the other states. He notes hospitals’ continuing concerns about the burdens and possible repercussions of focusing on several specific types of reporting data, including breakdowns by payer type and most frequently used drugs.
Hybrid Bills Combine Protections With Reporting Mandates
Five states that passed new 340B laws in 2025 did so with a twist. Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Rhode Island, and Vermont passed combination bills with both contract pharmacy protections with new reporting mandates. O’Donnell says he’s also concerned that statehouses are shoehorning in amendments to original statutes to ramp up concerning reporting requirements.
Model Legislation Could Mean More Debate in 2026
While Minnesota has served as a reference for reporting mandates for other states, model legislation from the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) has created more opportunities for state legislators to push proposals that would limit or scrutinize 340B. O’Donnell says this reflects part of the latest efforts from drugmakers to take their 340B priorities to sympathetic lawmakers at the state level, and it underscores the importance of informing and supporting hospitals on how to push back against these bills.
Resources:
- HRSA Approves Novartis’s 340B Rebate Pilot Proposal
- State Policy & Advocacy Communications Resource Center