
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Meta-analysis has become an increasingly popular tool used by many scientists to synthesise data. However, it's not without its detractors — from H. J. Eysenck, Ph.D., calling it "an exercise in mega-silliness" in 1978, to J. A. J. Heathers Ph.D., describing its use as a "profound moral failing" (he's half-serious) in 2016.
In this episode, Dan defends meta-analysis against more recent criticisms put forward by James and offers suggestions on how meta-analysis can be improved.
Links:
PRISMA statement - http://www.prisma-statement.org/
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
Twitter - https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
Support Everything Hertz
By Dan Quintana4.8
5555 ratings
Meta-analysis has become an increasingly popular tool used by many scientists to synthesise data. However, it's not without its detractors — from H. J. Eysenck, Ph.D., calling it "an exercise in mega-silliness" in 1978, to J. A. J. Heathers Ph.D., describing its use as a "profound moral failing" (he's half-serious) in 2016.
In this episode, Dan defends meta-analysis against more recent criticisms put forward by James and offers suggestions on how meta-analysis can be improved.
Links:
PRISMA statement - http://www.prisma-statement.org/
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
Twitter - https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
Support Everything Hertz

32,250 Listeners

314 Listeners

9,239 Listeners

863 Listeners

425 Listeners

2,545 Listeners

113,307 Listeners

15,689 Listeners

159 Listeners

457 Listeners

1,013 Listeners

15,506 Listeners

16,508 Listeners

3,915 Listeners

13 Listeners