
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Send us a text
Have you ever wondered what semi-supervised, weekly, and unsupervised artificial intelligence digital pathology models can do to help pathologists?
Can we finally stop annotating???
This episode's guest Geert Litjens - a member of the computational pathology group at Radboud University Medical Center explains how semi-supervised and weekly supervised artificial intelligence-based image analysis can help pathologists do better, more time-efficient, and data-efficient digital pathology.
The supervised deep learning image analysis methods are used often and are well accepted in the digital pathology scientific community, however, they rely heavily on whole slide image annotations. This is very time-consuming and is subjected to annotator to annotator variability.
There has been a lot of research going on in the computational pathology community on the semi and weakly supervised approaches. It turns out that those approaches are starting to match the results delivered by the supervised approaches.
Are we there yet? Can we stop annotating pathology slides altogether and rely on the slide-level labels?
Listen to the full episode to learn more + share with friends!
This episodes resources:
Other podcast episodes you'll enjoy:
Support the show
Become a Digital Pathology Trailblazer get the "Digital Pathology 101" FREE E-book and join us!
5
66 ratings
Send us a text
Have you ever wondered what semi-supervised, weekly, and unsupervised artificial intelligence digital pathology models can do to help pathologists?
Can we finally stop annotating???
This episode's guest Geert Litjens - a member of the computational pathology group at Radboud University Medical Center explains how semi-supervised and weekly supervised artificial intelligence-based image analysis can help pathologists do better, more time-efficient, and data-efficient digital pathology.
The supervised deep learning image analysis methods are used often and are well accepted in the digital pathology scientific community, however, they rely heavily on whole slide image annotations. This is very time-consuming and is subjected to annotator to annotator variability.
There has been a lot of research going on in the computational pathology community on the semi and weakly supervised approaches. It turns out that those approaches are starting to match the results delivered by the supervised approaches.
Are we there yet? Can we stop annotating pathology slides altogether and rely on the slide-level labels?
Listen to the full episode to learn more + share with friends!
This episodes resources:
Other podcast episodes you'll enjoy:
Support the show
Become a Digital Pathology Trailblazer get the "Digital Pathology 101" FREE E-book and join us!
2,049 Listeners
315 Listeners
476 Listeners
431 Listeners
111,530 Listeners
56,169 Listeners
91 Listeners
117 Listeners
270 Listeners
318 Listeners
177 Listeners
318 Listeners
141 Listeners
10 Listeners
50 Listeners