By Anthony Esolen

But first a note from Robert Royal: It's only three days since we started our mid-year funding campaign, and we're doing very well. There's still much more to do, however. It's outrageous, for example, that a column like today's by Professor Esolen even has to be written. But it has to be - as do many more if we are to resist being inundated not only by anti-Catholic criticism and outright bigotry from without, but also by incoherent and suicidal rot from within. You know that - and you also know that if we don't do something about it, we're only making it easier for those who wish the Faith ill. So do something. Click the button. Support the work of The Catholic Thing.

Now for today's column...

When I think of the generation of Catholic churchmen, religious sisters, theologians, and songsters who were coming into their revolution when I was a boy, and who have never admitted a single error, not even in such non-doctrinal matters as what they did to works of art in their churches, I imagine elderly hippies returning to Woodstock with canes and walkers, shimmying to the piped-in blaring of Sly and the Family Stone. "Bliss it was in those days to be alive!" says Wordsworth, looking back on the hopes he held in the French revolution.

But Wordsworth grew up. He came to view those days with a critical and judicious eye. With age, we hope, comes wisdom, and with that wisdom, regret for the sins and follies we all commit, most especially when we follow the spirit of the age and not the Holy Spirit, who does not change, and who is beyond all ages.

Yet I meet, all the time, stuck-in-the-mud progressives, fuddy-duddies of a revolution that has come and gone and left a lot of rubble behind, with very little institutional, intellectual, artistic, and cultural compensation. The scandal surrounding the artist Marco Rupnik is a case in point.

The man was a monster. If you invented his character for a novel, nobody would believe it; his filthy deeds seem to out of a bad rehash of The Exorcist. But setting that aside, I am astonished that anybody still admires his dull old programmatic pseudo-primitive art. What's next, doing the Watusi as you come back from Communion?

I got the same feeling as I read the reactions to a commencement speech, at Benedictine College, given by Harrison Butker, the kicker for the Kansas City Chiefs. Benedictine is an hour's drive away from the stadium, so it was a natural choice for the event's coordinators to make, as Butker is a devout Catholic, and Benedictine is a faithfully Catholic college.

In his speech, the young man said that the greatest of all titles for a woman is that of a wife and mother, and as he did so he praised his wife, and came to the point of tears. For saying what was not controversial when I was young, but what is abominated now, he has been the target of abuse and hatred.

The Sisters of Saint Scholastica, whose forebears founded Benedictine College, sneered at the "limited" vision of homemaking that Butker admired, preferring an attitudinal homemaking which, it appears, obviates the need to have a home and to make something of it. Spiritual diapers don't get your hands dirty.

Of course, Butker suggested only what Chesterton suggested long ago, to the effect that modern women rose up and said they would no longer be dictated to, and promptly became stenographers. How can it be "limiting," Chesterton said, to bring the universe to a child you love, but a spree of liberty to do one or two things hour after hour for bosses and strangers?

I could say that the place-kicker was the truly countercultural player in this controversy, since every engine of mass media and mass entertainment, almost every school and college, every profession, and all the powers and principalities within the Church and without, are ranged against him and his wife, reveling in the delight of making him look like a knuckle-dragging brute or nitwit, and his wife like a poor oppressed patsy.

Surely, the ...