
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
For 40 years, affirmative action policies were created in the United States to address a lack of women and people of colour in the workplace and at university. They have been questioned before, and are now under scrutiny once again in the Supreme Court.
Two cases are being brought by a group called Students for Fair Admissions challenging the way race is considered in the admissions process at Harvard and North Carolina Universities.
The case against Harvard specifically alleges discrimination against Asian Americans, which the prestigious college denies. But affirmative action is divisive and means different things to Americans.
Nomia Iqbal speaks to Edward Blum, the man bringing the case to court, and to students on either side of the debate.
Is the policy a helping hand, or an unfair handout?
4.4
3131 ratings
For 40 years, affirmative action policies were created in the United States to address a lack of women and people of colour in the workplace and at university. They have been questioned before, and are now under scrutiny once again in the Supreme Court.
Two cases are being brought by a group called Students for Fair Admissions challenging the way race is considered in the admissions process at Harvard and North Carolina Universities.
The case against Harvard specifically alleges discrimination against Asian Americans, which the prestigious college denies. But affirmative action is divisive and means different things to Americans.
Nomia Iqbal speaks to Edward Blum, the man bringing the case to court, and to students on either side of the debate.
Is the policy a helping hand, or an unfair handout?
5,402 Listeners
392 Listeners
1,859 Listeners
7,827 Listeners
77 Listeners
106 Listeners
1,779 Listeners
1,050 Listeners
31 Listeners
584 Listeners
2,089 Listeners
1,061 Listeners
1,894 Listeners
80 Listeners
78 Listeners
697 Listeners
750 Listeners
3,019 Listeners
184 Listeners
265 Listeners
77 Listeners
3 Listeners
6 Listeners
14 Listeners
0 Listeners