
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
For 40 years, affirmative action policies were created in the United States to address a lack of women and people of colour in the workplace and at university. They have been questioned before, and are now under scrutiny once again in the Supreme Court.
Two cases are being brought by a group called Students for Fair Admissions challenging the way race is considered in the admissions process at Harvard and North Carolina Universities.
The case against Harvard specifically alleges discrimination against Asian Americans, which the prestigious college denies. But affirmative action is divisive and means different things to Americans.
Nomia Iqbal speaks to Edward Blum, the man bringing the case to court, and to students on either side of the debate.
Is the policy a helping hand, or an unfair handout?
4.4
3131 ratings
For 40 years, affirmative action policies were created in the United States to address a lack of women and people of colour in the workplace and at university. They have been questioned before, and are now under scrutiny once again in the Supreme Court.
Two cases are being brought by a group called Students for Fair Admissions challenging the way race is considered in the admissions process at Harvard and North Carolina Universities.
The case against Harvard specifically alleges discrimination against Asian Americans, which the prestigious college denies. But affirmative action is divisive and means different things to Americans.
Nomia Iqbal speaks to Edward Blum, the man bringing the case to court, and to students on either side of the debate.
Is the policy a helping hand, or an unfair handout?
5,409 Listeners
371 Listeners
1,834 Listeners
7,676 Listeners
77 Listeners
106 Listeners
1,813 Listeners
1,081 Listeners
897 Listeners
960 Listeners
1,941 Listeners
1,052 Listeners
57 Listeners
832 Listeners
74 Listeners
981 Listeners
747 Listeners
2,977 Listeners
172 Listeners
252 Listeners
2,416 Listeners
5 Listeners
141 Listeners
48 Listeners
33 Listeners