Read about The Freedom Project here

Schedule a call with Gary to learn more about The Freedom Project here

Introduction:

What if the thing you’ve been chasing your entire life—safety—was never actually available in this reality?

In this Dead Talk, Christy brings in Seneca (Roman Stoic philosopher and advisor to Nero) and Dorothy Day (Catholic anarchist, activist, and fierce advocate for human dignity). Together they deliver a perspective shift that will change the way you think about safety.

Seneca’s message: “You were never meant to feel safe. You were meant to feel steady.”

Seneca dismantles the modern definition of safety as “continuity without disruption,” calling it a made-up idea that life has never promised. He describes watching fortunes vanish overnight, alliances dissolve, empires collapse—and noticing that the greatest suffering wasn’t caused by loss itself, but by the people who postponed living until conditions improved.

His definition of steadiness is piercing and practical:

Steadiness isn’t predicting outcomes.

Dorothy Day’s response: “True—and incomplete.”

You don’t survive uncertainty alone.

She reframes “support” as something most people don’t recognize because they only count certain things as support. Her version of safety isn’t built on guarantees—it’s built on belonging before you feel secure.

She introduces one of the most powerful lines of the episode:

“Don’t wait until you feel safe to belong. Just belong.”

The hidden trap: “Preparation” as disguised fear

One of the most practical takeaways comes when they reveal how postponement hides:

They don’t call these wrong—but they point out the pattern:

“If safety were not my concern, what would I do next?”

Why you’ll want to listen

It’s an episode that changes the language of your inner world.

By the end, you may find yourself questioning whether “safety” has been your unconscious religion—and whether steadiness is the freedom you were actually designed for.

Read about The Freedom Project here

Schedule a call with Gary to learn more about The Freedom Project here

This Dead Talk episode is a channeled teaching on inner freedom after trauma, guided by two historical figures: Etty Hillesum (young Jewish diarist who wrote from Westerbork and later Auschwitz) and Václav Havel (Czech dissident who became the first president of the Czech Republic after the Velvet Revolution). The core theme: freedom doesn’t come from being unhurt or from circumstances improving—it comes from no longer organizing life around the wound.

The main teaching: trauma is not the event

They redefine trauma as not what happened, and not even the pain. Trauma is:

This contraction becomes an internal “government” that continues long after the danger passes. It decides what you can feel, hope for, explore, or trust. In that sense, trauma is protective, intelligent, temporary by design—but it becomes limiting when it interferes with love, presence, and the ability to be touched by something good.

Freedom, they say, is not “healing trauma” as a project. It’s outgrowing it by restoring your range:

“Imprint” vs trauma

They introduce a second layer: imprint—fear and limitation installed before you had direct experience or choice. Imprints come from:

Because imprint fear is “older” than the current opportunity, it cannot be reasoned away. It must be met. The body is reacting to memory, not to now.

Examples of common imprints:

They note the irony: many listeners are not materially poor, yet their nervous systems are “poor” from imprinting.

Practical guidance they offer

They emphasize this is not a heavy “healing session,” but a noticing:

Key practices:

They make a key distinction: overriding fear to do something “wild” isn’t necessarily expansion—real expansion honors safety and lets fear soften through presence.

Group field moment

There’s a vivid description of the group’s energetic field: an oval, forward-oriented, permeable, slate-blue/soft gold tone—mature, coherent, grounded, not organized around wounds. “Connection without dependency; individuality without isolation.” Humor appears as a low “center of gravity”—less seriousness, more embodied decision-making.

Etty’s “inner tower” and the role of acceptance

Etty explains her awakening in the camps: it wasn’t dramatic kundalini-style; it began when she accepted the war would not end in time for her. That acceptance removed hope-as-victimhood and opened an “inner tower” (a state of unassailable coherence). The tower wasn’t protection—it was perspective. She remembered a dimension of being untouched by threat, time, or harm.

Her line: “Belief didn’t save me. My alignment did.”

The episode closes with a powerful reframing:

To learn about The Freedom Project - Click here

Two thinkers “arrive” right away: Ludwig Wittgenstein (Austria, philosopher of language) and Epictetus (Greek Stoic, formerly enslaved). Their combined theme becomes the episode’s core message: abundance and freedom don’t respond to self-improvement—they respond to present-moment participation, and the language we use either keeps us in “now” or pushes us into fear-based “later.”

Wittgenstein’s thread focuses on how our sentences shape our reality. He points out that many spiritual and abundance struggles are reinforced by everyday grammar: “I’m not ready,” “I’m not healed,” “I must become something else.” These are described as grammatical habits that turn life into a test to pass. Abundance (money, time, health, love) doesn’t show up when we “deserve it” or “fix ourselves”—it shows up when we stop managing it with fear and engage with what’s here.

Epictetus brings a steady, immovable energy and reframes freedom as the absence of inner argument with life. He shares the Stoic insight that suffering isn’t primarily caused by circumstances, but by the internal insistence: “This shouldn’t be happening.” Freedom, he says, is not growth but subtraction—not becoming more powerful, but noticing where we’ve been giving power away (waiting for conditions to improve, needing certainty, money, approval) and simply stopping.

The conversation then turns practical around money. The guides suggest money feels uniquely “heavy” because we use it to answer a future-based question: “Will I be okay later?” Unlike health, relationships, or time (experienced in the present), money is often used as emotional insurance—asked to provide safety, which “isn’t its job.” The episode offers a language-based reframe: shift from future-security sentences to present-usefulness. A key line: stop asking money to protect you from time.

They also address the belief in “sources of money” (job, investments, rentals) as a  limiter: the true source is you, via inspiration and participation. Scarcity is framed less as “not enough money” and more as fear of letting it move—guarding rather than participating.

Finally, they connect abundance and freedom as essentially parallel states: both are results of alignment and present-moment engagement. Freedom is “living as cause, not effect,” and abundance is “having what you need when you need it to do what needs doing”—both emerge when we stop requiring conditions to be different before we allow peace.

To learn about The Freedom Project - Click here

In this Dead Talk session, two familiar teachers step in right away—Joseph Campbell and Ram Dass—and the atmosphere is set with an image of a “classroom after it’s over,” signaling the core theme: no pressure, no performance, nothing to prove.

Campbell reframes the Hero’s Journey in a way that lands like a revelation: the journey was never meant to be a permanent identity or a life-long mandate. It’s a map for early identity formation, but many people turn the map into a moral obligation—equating struggle with legitimacy and suffering with worth. From his current perspective, the journey doesn’t end in triumph…it ends in irrelevance—not failure, but the relaxing of the need to matter. The “return” isn’t to be admired; it’s to be absorbed back into life, ordinary and intimate, without a narrative.

Ram Dass deepens that message with warmth and humility, sharing that he spent much of his life trying to be a “spiritual hero,” until life dismantled the role through his stroke—forcing surrender in public. The gift, he says, is that when you can no longer perform wisdom, you either become it or drop the act entirely. That collapse revealed something truer: love remained even when he wasn’t useful, articulate, or “teaching.” The session’s central question emerges: “What are you no longer willing to carry?”

The conversation then pivots into a powerful explanation of the Freedom Project as a field, not a program—something co-created by everyone touched by it. A program is information moving one direction; a field is mutual attunement, where insights land faster, resistance softens without confrontation, and people feel seen without being analyzed. The field holds ambiguity without panic, supports nervous system settling through contextual safety, and helps participants become coherent with the version of themselves they’re tuning toward—without forcing linear steps.

Campbell also revisits “Follow Your Bliss,” clarifying that bliss was never meant as indulgence or pleasure—it’s the subtle feeling of life moving through you: curiosity, fascination, a signal of direction. The reason people resist bliss isn’t laziness—it threatens identity, disrupts duty-as-virtue conditioning, and removes the “moral high ground” of sacrifice. Bliss doesn’t justify itself, and that’s why it’s so liberating.

Finally, Ram Dass speaks candidly about LSD and psychedelics: they don’t create alignment, install wisdom, or heal trauma by themselves. They can offer a glimpse—showing what’s possible when self-reference drops—but they don’t teach the nervous system how to live there. Psychedelics are a door-opener, not a home.

The session closes with the same overarching invitation: as the hero dissolves, life becomes simpler, more present, and more intimate—service without superiority, love without a role, and freedom without the need to matter.

To learn about The Freedom Project - Click here

In this Dead Talk episode, two seemingly opposite voices—Milton Friedman and Thích Nhất Hạnh—come together to dismantle one of the deepest and most persistent distortions around abundance. Their shared message is clear: abundance is not something that arrives after enlightenment, worthiness, or alignment—it is the state of alignment itself. Much of our suffering around money, they explain, comes not from lack, but from misunderstanding cause and effect. When abundance is treated as a reward or result, the present moment becomes a means to an end.

Together, they reframe abundance as a condition we stop interfering with rather than something we earn, manage, or deserve. Friedman brings precision and clarity, showing how treating abundance as a moral outcome distorts economic, relational, and spiritual systems. Thích Nhất Hạnh brings warmth and spaciousness, reminding us that freedom and mindfulness are daily practices—especially in the places we avoid most. They introduce the idea of a “precise life,” where challenges, delays, and tensions are not signs of misalignment but exact experiences required to develop specific capacities: tolerance for uncertainty, sensitivity to inner signals, discernment between force and flow, and the ability to stay present while resources move.

The episode culminates in a powerful embodied experiment that reveals where scarcity truly lives—not in circumstances, but in the nervous system’s reflex to brace and prepare for loss. Listeners are invited to let something small circulate without reassurance and notice what happens when they stop interrupting support. The central realization lands quietly but unmistakably: abundance does not arrive to make us feel safe; safety comes from trusting our ability to respond. In this way, the conversation becomes less about money and more about dissolving the illusion of separation—allowing life to support us without resistance, just in time, exactly as it always has.

To learn about The Freedom Project - Click here

In this episode:

Queen Nefertiti appears first—regal, luminous, Egyptian headdress, blue gown, and an energetic breeze moving only around her. Her opening line establishes the theme: “I am seated fully within myself. And so are you.” The name comes through as “Nefertiti.”

Viktor Frankl appears next—gentle presence, glasses, gray hair, calm smile. His identity is confirmed through the title Man’s Search for Meaning. His energy is quiet but powerful, grounded in lived experience.

Together they deliver a unified teaching: sovereignty is not granted by rulers, removed by circumstances, or earned through status. It is an ancient inheritance—a return to an inner throne.

Nefertiti emphasizes that sovereignty begins when you stop “borrowing your center” from the world:

stop needing external confirmation of worth

stop shaping identity around approval or fear

return to the “inner throne” that most people abandon early in childhood

She reframes sovereignty not as independence, but as intimacy with your own essence—an unbroken connection between your being and Source. From her view, a sovereign being doesn’t dominate or defend; it simply is, and life reorganizes around that state of being.

Frankl complements this with his signature insight: there is an inner space no one can touch—not cruelty, misfortune, despair, or authority. Sovereignty is claimed inside limitation. He underscores the central idea:

between stimulus and response is a space; in that space lies your power, freedom, and sovereignty.

So sovereignty becomes: choosing meaning, response, perspective, and the story you tell—regardless of conditions.

Gary asks if Nefertiti’s real-life queenship was an external version of sovereignty. She explains that her outward crown was only a reflection of an already-claimed inner seat. She believed she was living political power, but from her current perspective she sees it as a frequency demonstration—energetic rulership, not domination. Her power was never her life circumstances; it was her being.

The conversation goes deep into Frankl’s experience of the Holocaust. Frankl describes the camps as the place where he discovered what cannot be taken: inner meaning and inner freedom. He says that despair killed faster than starvation, and that hope/purpose gave the body strength—because inner choice was the only remaining domain of power.

He distinguishes what he believed while alive vs. what he sees now:

Then: he did not view suffering as chosen; he saw it as brutal, imposed, dehumanizing, senseless.

Now: he perceives a “metaphysical architecture” and soul-level intention behind events, without calling suffering “beautiful.” He frames it as purposeful at a soul level for many—sometimes as agreements, sometimes as “perfect matches” to intentions—within an intricate web of collective and personal trajectories.

He clarifies it was not karmic punishment, and that the experience (for him) aligned with a pre-birth intention to test the limits of inner freedom and anchor the understanding of choice.

When asked about the broader impact, he suggests the event revealed something profound to mass consciousness: resilience of spirit, the architecture of psyche, and expansions that reshaped societies—implying it catalyzed shifts toward unity and deeper human awareness.

A particularly provocative point arises: his “now” perspective suggests even figures viewed as villains are still part of the same larger consciousness exploration—equal in the sense of soul-level value—though he acknowledges his human-life perspective experienced it as far beyond “villainy.”

Nefertiti repeatedly indicates an unusually easy energetic merge with Christy—suggesting a vibrational or lineage resonance. She also clarifies that in her earthly life she ruled in an equal partnership (a “true dyad”) rather than as a subordinate consort.

Gary asks about sleep in Nefertiti’s era. She describes a biphasic sleep rhythm: two sleeps with a calm waking period between—often communal, practical, intimate, and even sacred. The “midnight waking” was considered normal and a time when the veil was thin and the mind receptive. She connects this to modern spiritual waking patterns (often 2–3 a.m.) and suggests artificial light disrupted humanity’s natural wisdom of the night.

Asked about slavery, Nefertiti frames it as a normalized social institution in her era, not a personal moral crusade. She claims it was not racially defined in her context and that slaves had certain legal rights (marriage, property, potential freedom). She acknowledges that from a higher perspective no being can possess another, but she did not fully awaken to that truth while living. She also challenges modern moral superiority as sometimes “convenient,” encouraging judgment with an awareness of historical evolution.

Christy asks about logotherapy and meaning. Frankl offers a “then vs. now” refinement:

Then: life has meaning and your task is to find it; meaning comes through purpose, responsibility, and choice.

Now: life does not contain meaning as a hidden object; meaning is generated by consciousness in the moment.He says presence is the true source of meaning—not achievement, mission, sacrifice, or suffering. Meaning is not in what you do, but in how fully you inhabit the moment.

The episode culminates in a guided ceremony. Participants see unique illuminated symbols beneath their stone seats—geometric codes “to the soul”: lotus-like patterns, crystalline lattices, star clusters, spirals, ancient scripts, light-language signatures. Then, behind each person, a chair of light appears—unique, elegant—described not as an ego throne but a “throne of inner governance.”

Nefertiti leads the ritual: stand, turn, and sit into the seat you abandoned when you believed the world had authority over you. The intention is embodiment: ruling your meaning, perception, response, and inner calm. The key line:

Afterward, Gary shares he perceived a merkaba geometry beneath his seat, and Christy notes a palpable energetic shift, including Nefertiti’s strong presence “slipping in.”

In this episode, Christy brings in Marcus Aurelius and Hereward the Outlaw to discuss the balance between Order and Rebellion. The two ideas are not opposed, but actually deeply connected. They are alies and if we can understand these concepts through the perspectives shared by Marcus and Hereward, we can strike a balance that will lead to a very powerful stance in our lives.

Schedule a call to learn about The Freedom Project - Click here

To book a 55-minute Connect Call with Gary, click here

The theme for this Dead Talk is perception. In this episode, Christy brings in two 20th century poets, Mary Oliver and Audre Lorde. They were two vastly different people who shared a common thread: Perception as a tool for discovering truth.

Together they bring us the Dual Perception Methid that we can use when we are unclear about the turth of a given subject. It could be a relationship, a concept, an issue we're having or just about anything else. When we're unclear, we can use this method to look at it from two very different perspective and we will discover the truth. It's absolutely astonishing how well this works.

Schedule a call to learn about The Freedom Project - Click here

To book a 55-minute Connect Call with Gary, click here

In this  episode of Dead Talk, the group connects with the spirits of Jeanne la Pucelle — Joan of Arc —and James Baldwin, two luminous souls who lived centuries apart yet carried the same divine paradox: Freedom is won through rebellion in grace. It's the loving rebellion of our own beliefs.

True rebellion is not the fight against darkness, but the refusal to surrender our light to it. Baldwin calls forgiveness “the highest rebellion,” the act that ends the war within, while Joan reminds us that obedience to love, not fear, is what ignites genuine freedom.

Together, they explore what it means to embody “rebellion as grace”: to live truthfully without the need for approval, to forgive as an act of liberation, and to follow divine guidance even when it defies expectation. They remind us that the voices of spirit never command — they reveal love — and that today’s revolution is one of compassion, patience, and the courage to live our truth aloud. “You are not being called to die for your truth,” Joan says. “You are being asked to live it.”

Schedule a call to learn about The Freedom Project - Click here

To book a 55-minute Connect Call with Gary, click here

The Freedom Project begins with a technique called Perspective Mapping. It's a process where the person fills out a series of ten surveys related to all areas of their life. Then they have a call with Gary to identify key belief structures that generate their current perspective. Finally they have a spirit guide reading with Christy. This is the most fasinating part of this process. In this episode you will hear exactly what Renee and Crstal's spirit guides told each of them in preparation for their Freedom Project experience.

Once the Perspective Mapping process has been completed, Christy and I are able to custom tailor a 100-day program specifically for each person based on their current perspective and what they want in their life. Through this process, the person will expand their perspective in all areas of their life and arrive at a completely new perspective that generates a new vibration. Since all limitations are self-imposed through one's current perspective, expanding that perspective leads to freedom. That's why they call it The Freedom Project. Nothing like this has ever been done before, because no other program starts by identifying one's current perspective and then creates a custom plan to specifically expand that person's perspective.

Schedule a call to learn about The Freedom Project - Click here

To book a 55-minute Connect Call with Gary, click here