As Judge Brad Schimel and Judge Susan Crawford battled for the bench in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court election, left-leaning and right-leaning outlets framed the race through drastically different lenses, turning a state judicial contest into a national political flashpoint.

In episode 15 of Bias Breakdown, we explore how left-leaning outlets honed in on Elon Musk’s financial backing of Judge Schimel, painting it as a billionaire’s attempt to buy the court. Meanwhile, right-leaning media spotlighted Democratic donors’ focus on flipping congressional seats, portraying Judge Crawford’s campaign as a partisan power grab.

Media narratives largely mirrored the interests of their aligned candidates, often omitting ethical concerns raised by the opposition. We break down the stark contrasts in coverage, revealing how each side shaped the election.

How did the same set of deportation flights produce such drastically different headlines? In this episode, we break down the legal battle over the Trump administration’s use of the Alien Enemies Act—and the media’s role in shaping the narrative surrounding a judge’s ruling to halt the deportations. Left-leaning outlets have framed the flights as a violation of judicial authority, while right-leaning sources argue that the administration acted within its rights and complied with the court order.

In Episode 14 of Bias Breakdown, we walk through the timeline of the flights, the judge’s ruling, and how different media sources have reported on the case, inserting their own political spin. We analyze the facts—and the narratives—so you can form your own opinion on this ongoing legal battle.

President Donald Trump has questioned former President Joe Biden’s use of an autopen to sign official documents and pardons. The Heritage Foundation sparked the debate, claiming Biden’s signatures on multiple documents appear identical, raising doubts about their authenticity. In episode 13 of Bias Breakdown, we'll analyze the media narratives, with right-leaning outlets focusing on concerns over Biden’s mental acuity and possible abuse of power, while left-leaning outlets downplay the issue, emphasizing that autopen use is legally sound and historically precedented.

In this week’s episode of Bias Breakdown, we explore the conflicting media narratives surrounding the alleged feud between Elon Musk and Secretary of State Marco Rubio during a closed-door cabinet meeting, as reported by The New York Times. Left-leaning outlets highlight the report’s allegations as chaos and dysfunction within the Trump Administration, while right-leaning outlets dismissed the report as part of a larger attempt by the left to discredit DOGE’s efforts to cut government waste.

In episode 12 of Bias Breakdown, we delve into the facts of the story and the broader media division in covering Musk’s involvement with DOGE, shedding light on the contrasting ways different outlets frame his influence.

In this week’s episode of Bias Breakdown, we dive into the media's contrasting portrayals of the tense Oval Office meeting between President Trump, Vice President Vance, and Ukrainian President Zelenskyy. Left-leaning outlets framed Trump’s comments as an attack on Zelenskyy, while right-leaning media focused on Zelenskyy’s stance and perceived lack of gratitude. We analyze how biased word choices in headlines and fact-checking discrepancies shape public perception, influencing how the meeting is understood across political lines.

In episode 11 of Bias Breakdown, we expose the media's role in spinning the narrative and help viewers separate the facts from the bias.

Recent polls on President Donald Trump’s favorability have sparked conflicting reports from left- and right-leaning media. Are Trump’s approval numbers historically low, or is he more favorable than ever? Are his actions in his first 30 days popular or unpopular? The answer depends on which news source you follow.

In episode 10 of Bias Breakdown, we analyze the conflicting narratives in headlines and network coverage of recent polling. We examine how left- and right-leaning outlets shape public perception by framing the data through their preferred political lens.

CBS News has come under fire from conservative media for comments made by Face the Nation host Margaret Brennan, who referenced how free speech was exploited in Nazi Germany to carry out the Holocaust. The backlash also centers on a 60 Minutes report highlighting police raids in Germany targeting individuals who violated their speech laws. Media responses to the controversy have varied significantly, with right-leaning outlets amplifying the criticism while left-leaning outlets largely ignore the story.

In Episode 9 of Bias Breakdown, we analyze how these contrasting coverage choices reveal the different weight each political side places on the controversy—and what it says about the broader media divide.

As USAID faces mounting political scrutiny, media coverage from the left and right tells two very different stories. Is the agency recklessly spending taxpayer dollars on controversial programs, or is it an essential tool for global aid? In episode 8 of Bias Breakdown, we unpack the debate, from disputed grants in Guatemala to accusations of indirect funding for Hamas. We analyze media narratives and explore what’s next for USAID under the Trump administration. Tune in for a deep dive into the facts—and the framing—shaping this heated controversy.

President Trump’s crackdown on illegal immigration is in full swing, with ICE conducting daily operations in major cities and resulting in the arrests of hundreds of migrants living in the country illegally. As part of one of those ICE raids in Chicago, Dr. Phil participated in a ride-along with ICE agents and Border Czar Tom Homan. The presence of the talk show host has divided media coverage, with narratives that align with news outlets' political biases.

In episode 7 of Bias Breakdown, we examine how left-leaning outlets criticize Dr. Phil’s involvement, labeling it a “spectacle,” while right-leaning outlets tout it as an “effective” portrayal of ICE’s success in the field. Tune in as we unpack these contrasting narratives and explore how media bias shapes public perception of immigration enforcement.

Following President Donald Trump’s inauguration, Elon Musk delivered an enthusiastic speech, at one point making an arm gesture that has drawn different interpretations, fueling division among left- and right-leaning media outlets.

In episode 6 of Bias Breakdown, we analyze how left-leaning outlets focused on interpretations of Musk’s gesture as a "Nazi salute," while right-leaning outlets accuse the left of politicizing the moment. We examine how this single event was framed differently by each side, highlighting the polarized media landscape and how narratives can diverge based on political bias.