Conspirituality

Bonus Sample: The Perils of "Free Speech"

09.04.2023 - By Derek Beres, Matthew Remski, Julian WalkerPlay

Download our free app to listen on your phone

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Claiming your First Amendment rights are being violated is a sure way to have the spotlight shone on you. It's also an effective way to shut down criticism of whatever you're selling. From the 1940s-60s, supplements manufacturers used the free speech gambit to keep regulators away from their products, resulting in a 1969 Supreme Court case. Derek looks at the 20th century evolution of medical regulations, and how companies are still using a similar argument to dissuade consumers from looking too deeply into what's inside the bottle. Sign up today at butcherbox.com/CONSPIRITUALITY and use code CONSPIRITUALITY to get two 100% grass-fed filet mignons and two wild-caught lobster tails for FREE in your first box plus $20 off your first order. Show Notes Dietary Supplements: A Framework for Evaluating Safety United States v Kordel Some Implications of the Kordel Decision 163: The Huberman Paradox Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

More episodes from Conspirituality