
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
When the Supreme Court says something is or isn't constitutional, what does that really mean? What are the effects, or lack thereof, of their decisions? And what do we do if we don't agree with what they say?
Today Linda Monk, author of The Bill of Rights: A User's Guide, walks us through four times in US History that the Supreme Court was not the be-all-end-all decision maker.
Here are some links to shows we reference in the episode:
Dred Scott v Sandford
Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka
4.2
24762,476 ratings
When the Supreme Court says something is or isn't constitutional, what does that really mean? What are the effects, or lack thereof, of their decisions? And what do we do if we don't agree with what they say?
Today Linda Monk, author of The Bill of Rights: A User's Guide, walks us through four times in US History that the Supreme Court was not the be-all-end-all decision maker.
Here are some links to shows we reference in the episode:
Dred Scott v Sandford
Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka
1,096 Listeners
3,881 Listeners
6,286 Listeners
8,242 Listeners
3,480 Listeners
118 Listeners
25,717 Listeners
137 Listeners
1,452 Listeners
4,612 Listeners
86,172 Listeners
111,121 Listeners
55,874 Listeners
32,401 Listeners
14,993 Listeners
2,400 Listeners
15,937 Listeners
805 Listeners
5,581 Listeners
1,342 Listeners
327 Listeners
5,981 Listeners
6 Listeners
818 Listeners
4 Listeners
2 Listeners
261 Listeners
32 Listeners
121 Listeners