
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
When the Supreme Court says something is or isn't constitutional, what does that really mean? What are the effects, or lack thereof, of their decisions? And what do we do if we don't agree with what they say?
Today Linda Monk, author of The Bill of Rights: A User's Guide, walks us through four times in US History that the Supreme Court was not the be-all-end-all decision maker.
Here are some links to shows we reference in the episode:
Dred Scott v Sandford
Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka
4.2
24652,465 ratings
When the Supreme Court says something is or isn't constitutional, what does that really mean? What are the effects, or lack thereof, of their decisions? And what do we do if we don't agree with what they say?
Today Linda Monk, author of The Bill of Rights: A User's Guide, walks us through four times in US History that the Supreme Court was not the be-all-end-all decision maker.
Here are some links to shows we reference in the episode:
Dred Scott v Sandford
Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka
1,086 Listeners
14,154 Listeners
3,442 Listeners
117 Listeners
7,850 Listeners
25,757 Listeners
137 Listeners
1,433 Listeners
86,375 Listeners
111,530 Listeners
56,169 Listeners
14,930 Listeners
2,386 Listeners
15,878 Listeners
811 Listeners
5,469 Listeners
1,343 Listeners
324 Listeners
5,972 Listeners
15,263 Listeners
6 Listeners
818 Listeners
4 Listeners
0 Listeners
242 Listeners
1,399 Listeners
7 Listeners
62 Listeners