
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode, Christopher T. Brooks, Professor of History at East Stroudsburg University, discusses his work on appellate judicial selection. He explains that state appellate judges are usually either elected or appointed with the advice of nominating committees. He argues that both methods are flawed, and that it would be better for judges to be appointed by elected nominating committees. Brooks is on LinkedIn.
This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye and on Bluesky at @brianlfrye.bsky.social.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
By CC0/Public Domain4.9
9999 ratings
In this episode, Christopher T. Brooks, Professor of History at East Stroudsburg University, discusses his work on appellate judicial selection. He explains that state appellate judges are usually either elected or appointed with the advice of nominating committees. He argues that both methods are flawed, and that it would be better for judges to be appointed by elected nominating committees. Brooks is on LinkedIn.
This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye and on Bluesky at @brianlfrye.bsky.social.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

9,231 Listeners

3,546 Listeners

384 Listeners

1,116 Listeners

6,310 Listeners

5,867 Listeners

15,693 Listeners

5,867 Listeners

3,953 Listeners

1,444 Listeners

3,548 Listeners

65 Listeners

396 Listeners

745 Listeners

2,286 Listeners