CompassCare

Originally aired August 2019

The American Medical Association (AMA) has joined a lawsuit with the last remaining abortionist in North Dakota against a new state requirement mandating full disclosure to a woman that her chemical abortion could be reversed. The AMA summarily rejects scientific studies demonstrating the effectiveness of progesterone therapy for reversing chemical abortions.

85% of all chemical abortion procedures kill the baby without additional intervention. Studies show that with progesterone treatments administered within 72 hours of the first chemical abortion pill, up to 70% of pregnancies are saved. Oddly, the AMA, ostensibly a medical organization, has dismissed peer-reviewed science as “lies” without producing any contrary research of their own.

If the AMA is truly a medical organization, and believes patient choice is critical in healthcare, why would they want to cover up this research?

To help sponsor Real Abortion News by CompassCare go to RealAbortionNews.com/donate

On June 13  Andrew Cuomo summarily eliminated religious exemptions for vaccine using propaganda to incite fear over a Measles outbreak. Christians believe all human life is made in the image of God and infinitely valuable. They also hold that each individual must maintain the right over their own person against the force of another. These beliefs cause many Christians to reject vaccines which use aborted fetal tissue in the manufacturing process. It is wrong to destroy an innocent human being and it is wrong to benefit from that murder.

Why is trampling the religious liberty of a minority of people of concern to Cuomo? The CDC states that 95% of all children are vaccinated. This is more than enough to maintain herd immunity. Even if there are disease outbreaks and 95% of all children are vaccinated is the problem really the unvaccinated child?[H1]

This Real Abortion News segment is brought to you by CompassCare. To support this work go to RealAbortionNews.com.

[H1]I think we should make these questions about parental rights and/or religious liberty

Originally aired August 2019

In 2018, Planned Parenthood’s long-time CEO Cecil Richards resigned in the midst of scandal, and was replaced by Physician CEO Leana Wen. In a three hour secret meeting on July 16, Planned Parenthood’s board summarily dismissed Dr. Wen for her lack of emphasis on abortion politics. Apparently Wen thought she was hired to run a healthcare organization, not a political one.

In a statement released by Wen she wrote: “I am leaving because the new Board Chairs and I have philosophical differences over the direction and future of Planned Parenthood.” It is noteworthy that the primary experience of Board Member and interim CEO Alexis McGill Johnson is political activism.

Are Planned Parenthood’s real goals improving healthcare for women or securing a political agenda?

This Real Abortion News segment is brought to you by CompassCare. To support this work go to RealAbortionNews.com.

Originally aired August 2019

Late in June, Gallup released its longstanding annual report surveying America’s view on abortion.  This highly regarded public-opinion poll showed that in just one year American’s who believe abortion ought to be either ‘illegal in only a few circumstances’ or ‘illegal in all circumstances’ jumped seven percentage points from 53% to 60%.

Dr. Michael New in an analysis of the poll finds that these results may be signaling a shift in the way Americans respond to abortion headlines. He states, “…it is entirely possible that aggressive efforts by Democrats to make abortion policy more permissive in states such as New York…actually might have resulted in gains in the pro-life sentiment.

Are Americans approaching a rejection of abortion tipping point?

This Real Abortion News segment is brought to you by CompassCare. To support this work go to RealAbortionNews.com.

Originally aired July 2019

In 2015 and 2016 Planned Parenthood was embarrassed when an undercover citizen journalist documented its participation in the illegal trafficking of aborted baby body parts. This expose triggered congressional hearings in 2017 and sparked a justice department investigation into Planned Parenthood. The abortion giant then sued the citizen journalist for $20 million in damages. Earlier this month, a California federal judge gutted Planned Parenthood’s retaliatory lawsuit, reducing possible damages from $20 million to perhaps $100,000.

Defendant David Daleiden responded publically: “Now that the facts…are in, even Planned Parenthood’s favorite judge refuses to buy into the abortion giant’s…lies.”

Why would Planned Parenthood seek to punish free speech rights of journalists? What don’t they want the public to know?

This Real Abortion News segment is brought to you by CompassCare. To support this work go to RealAbortionNews.com.

Originally aired July 2019

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, according to Melinda Gates, are using their massive wealth for social engineering experimentation in ‘Third World nations.’ Their goal is to demonstrate results on their predetermined social values so that governments can then ‘really scale them up.’

The Gates Foundation is known for funding international abortion providers like Planned Parenthood’s Marie Stopes organization. According to a recent report the Gates Foundation even donated $18 million to abortion promoting programs through the United Nations Population Fund or UNFPA. According to the BBC, that organization has been linked to promoting human rights violations through forced sterilization and abortion in China.

Have the people of these ‘third world’ nations consented to the Gate’s intrusion? How is this different from the destructive forced colonization of Africa by European empires?

To help sponsor Real Abortion News by CompassCare go to RealAbortionNews.com/donate

Originally aired July 2019

Late last May Illinois quietly passed a bill mirroring NY’s now infamous Reproductive Health Act which made national headlines and sparked a flurry of pro-life State legislation limiting, and in the case of Alabama, outlawing abortion altogether.

However, while New York’s bill made abortion a human right, the Illinois bill took it a step further repealing longstanding protections for medical providers who refuse to participate in abortion. Now it is illegal for medical providers in Illinois to not refer or participate in abortion even if it goes against their deeply held convictions.

What makes legislators think that their narrow beliefs about who qualifies as a person should trump the beliefs of health care providers? Don’t we want health care providers who have a deep and broad commitment to respecting and protecting all humans?

To help sponsor Real Abortion News by CompassCare go to RealAbortionNews.com/donate

New York City Comptroller Scott Stringer advocated for building an abortion access fund for Mayor de Blasio to finalize in the NYC budget by the end of June. The initial proposal includes $250,000 to pay for 500-600 abortions, even for women that would travel to the city for their abortion.

In a recent report Stringer is apparently using this fund as start-up capital to prime the pump for abortion tourism. He said, “When you have the last few dollars in the bank…I want you to come to New York City and know there will be no financial barrier to safe abortion…”

Does Comptroller Stringer know that New York tax payers are already funding half of all abortions via Medicaid? And since when does the role of financial comptroller include abortion promotion?

To help sponsor Real Abortion News by CompassCare go to RealAbortionNews.com/donate

Originally aired June 2019

On May 2 President Trump announced new regulations protecting the conscience of pro-life doctors and nurses. The goal is to strengthen and enforce the existing conscience protections for all providers and organizations receiving federal monies overseen through the Depart of Health and Human Services.

Over the last several years much confusion has arisen due to Obamacare regulations and related Supreme Court challenges as to expectation that medical providers use their skill to kill instead of heal through abortion, abortion referrals, abortion-causing contraception and the like. Why do States like New York disagree?

Why should a nation built with a constitutional framework, the foundation of which is the freedom of religion, exempt medical professionals from living out what they believe through their life’s work. If politicians can do it why wouldn’t medical professionals be able to as well?

To help sponsor Real Abortion News by CompassCare go to RealAbortionNews.com/donate

Originally aired June 2019

Challenging the Supreme Court’s “notoriously incorrect” 1973 ruling legalizing abortion, Roe v Wade, is the intent of Alabama’s total ban signed into law by Madam Governor Kay Ivey. Alabama’s State Spearheading the campaign Madam Representative Terri Collins stated, “…what I’m trying to do here is get this case in front of the Supreme Court so Roe v. Wade can be overturned.”

Many people on both sides of the debate believe the Supreme Court will take one of the many opportunities many State are now providing to modify or overturn the 1973 ruling. Abortion supporters fear it driving States like New York to make abortion a human right through bills like the presidentially ridiculed Reproductive Health Act.

What would happen if the Supreme Court actually heard open dialogue regarding the core belief undergirding the pro-life position; that all persons are equally valuable without qualification?

To help sponsor Real Abortion News by CompassCare go to RealAbortionNews.com/donate