
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Provide your feedback here. Anonymously send me a text message.
In this episode, Mike discusses the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal decision R. v. Brabant, 2025 SKCA 101 where police arrested a man without reasonable grounds to do so. When the man was searched, police found meth in his pocket and a sawed-off rifle under his sweater. Although the trial judge found Charter breaches — arbitrary detention and unreasonable search — the evidence was nevertheless admitted because the police could have detained the man and patted him down for safety and discovered the evidence anyway. Did the trial judge properly consider discoverability of the evidence in his s. 24(2) analysis? Or should the evidence have been excluded? Listen and find out how Saskatchewan’s Court of Appeal felt about the trial judge’s ruling.
Thanks for listening! Feedback welcome at [email protected]
By LIIPProvide your feedback here. Anonymously send me a text message.
In this episode, Mike discusses the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal decision R. v. Brabant, 2025 SKCA 101 where police arrested a man without reasonable grounds to do so. When the man was searched, police found meth in his pocket and a sawed-off rifle under his sweater. Although the trial judge found Charter breaches — arbitrary detention and unreasonable search — the evidence was nevertheless admitted because the police could have detained the man and patted him down for safety and discovered the evidence anyway. Did the trial judge properly consider discoverability of the evidence in his s. 24(2) analysis? Or should the evidence have been excluded? Listen and find out how Saskatchewan’s Court of Appeal felt about the trial judge’s ruling.
Thanks for listening! Feedback welcome at [email protected]

229,664 Listeners

37,388 Listeners

41,410 Listeners

28,018 Listeners

4,776 Listeners

11,016 Listeners

6,496 Listeners

1,241 Listeners

77 Listeners

1,702 Listeners

47,485 Listeners

46,363 Listeners

85 Listeners

78 Listeners

29 Listeners