
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Provide your feedback here. Anonymously send me a text message.
In this episode, Mike discusses the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal decision R. v. Brabant, 2025 SKCA 101 where police arrested a man without reasonable grounds to do so. When the man was searched, police found meth in his pocket and a sawed-off rifle under his sweater. Although the trial judge found Charter breaches — arbitrary detention and unreasonable search — the evidence was nevertheless admitted because the police could have detained the man and patted him down for safety and discovered the evidence anyway. Did the trial judge properly consider discoverability of the evidence in his s. 24(2) analysis? Or should the evidence have been excluded? Listen and find out how Saskatchewan’s Court of Appeal felt about the trial judge’s ruling.
Thanks for listening! Feedback welcome at [email protected]
By LIIPProvide your feedback here. Anonymously send me a text message.
In this episode, Mike discusses the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal decision R. v. Brabant, 2025 SKCA 101 where police arrested a man without reasonable grounds to do so. When the man was searched, police found meth in his pocket and a sawed-off rifle under his sweater. Although the trial judge found Charter breaches — arbitrary detention and unreasonable search — the evidence was nevertheless admitted because the police could have detained the man and patted him down for safety and discovered the evidence anyway. Did the trial judge properly consider discoverability of the evidence in his s. 24(2) analysis? Or should the evidence have been excluded? Listen and find out how Saskatchewan’s Court of Appeal felt about the trial judge’s ruling.
Thanks for listening! Feedback welcome at [email protected]

229,264 Listeners

37,587 Listeners

41,262 Listeners

27,774 Listeners

4,721 Listeners

10,910 Listeners

6,432 Listeners

1,225 Listeners

75 Listeners

1,696 Listeners

47,753 Listeners

44,527 Listeners

79 Listeners

78 Listeners

33 Listeners