
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Since the 1990s, developers in Florida who want to build on wetlands have been required to buy offset credits from "wetland mitigation banks," private restoration projects that convert degraded land, often former pasture, back into functioning wetland elsewhere in the same region. Like other environmental offset markets, the program has proved controversial.
In a paper in the American Economic Review, authors Daniel Aronoff and Will Rafey found that wetland offsets generated roughly $2.4 billion in private gains from trade but also a significant increase in overall flood damage because wetlands were moved away from places where they protected existing homes.
Rafey recently spoke with Tyler Smith about what the results mean for the design of environmental markets and wetland regulations.
By American Economic Association4.6
1818 ratings
Since the 1990s, developers in Florida who want to build on wetlands have been required to buy offset credits from "wetland mitigation banks," private restoration projects that convert degraded land, often former pasture, back into functioning wetland elsewhere in the same region. Like other environmental offset markets, the program has proved controversial.
In a paper in the American Economic Review, authors Daniel Aronoff and Will Rafey found that wetland offsets generated roughly $2.4 billion in private gains from trade but also a significant increase in overall flood damage because wetlands were moved away from places where they protected existing homes.
Rafey recently spoke with Tyler Smith about what the results mean for the design of environmental markets and wetland regulations.

32,090 Listeners

30,672 Listeners

4,140 Listeners

4,272 Listeners

2,446 Listeners

315 Listeners

9,534 Listeners

548 Listeners

481 Listeners

175 Listeners

260 Listeners

5,532 Listeners

15,967 Listeners

349 Listeners

138 Listeners