
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Urologist Dr. Claus Roehrborn and Interventional Radiologist Dr. Sandeep Bagla discuss the pros and cons of Prostate Artery Embolization (PAE) compared to other Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatments (MISTS) for Benign Prostate Hyperplasia (BPH). They also discuss the importance of a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach when offering these treatment options, including agreeing on the best treatment for the patient.
---
CHECK OUT OUR SPONSOR
RADPAD® Radiation Protection
https://www.radpad.com/
---
EARN CME
Reflect on how this Podcast applies to your day-to-day and earn AMA PRA Category 1 CMEs: https://earnc.me/Daw1w2
---
SHOW NOTES
In this episode, urologist Dr. Claus Roehrborn and interventional radiologist Dr. Sandeep Bagla discuss benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate artery embolization (PAE) in the context of counseling patients and cross-specialty collaboration.
Dr. Roehrborn starts by reviewing the history of BPH treatment, from medications like alpha-blockers and anticholinergics, to minimally invasive options like UroLift, Rezum, and PAE. He emphasizes that the latter options are growing in popularity, since they provide treatment alternatives for patients who are concerned about side effects from medications, or have not experienced symptom relief from medications.
Dr. Sandeep Bagla describes Prostate Cancer USA’s philosophy on IR/Urology partnership and how it can ultimately benefit patients. This model provides the patient with both an IR suite for the PAE procedure and a urology clinic for diagnostic assessment, determination of PAE candidacy, and follow-up assessment.
Both doctors describe ideal patients for PAE. These are usually patients with a gland size above 60 g, confirmed bladder function, and a desire to preserve ejaculation function. Contraindications include urinary retention, chronic prostatitis, and heavily calcified glands.
Finally, they describe how they manage minor short-term complications such as frequency and dysuria with medication. They track symptom relief using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Dr. Bagla notes that the largest drop in IPSS usually occurs about 4-5 weeks post-procedure.
---
RESOURCES
Prostate Centers USA: https://www.prostatecentersusa.com/
“The Role of Novel Minimally Invasive Treatments for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Associated with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia”:
https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bju.15154
4.8
4949 ratings
Urologist Dr. Claus Roehrborn and Interventional Radiologist Dr. Sandeep Bagla discuss the pros and cons of Prostate Artery Embolization (PAE) compared to other Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatments (MISTS) for Benign Prostate Hyperplasia (BPH). They also discuss the importance of a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach when offering these treatment options, including agreeing on the best treatment for the patient.
---
CHECK OUT OUR SPONSOR
RADPAD® Radiation Protection
https://www.radpad.com/
---
EARN CME
Reflect on how this Podcast applies to your day-to-day and earn AMA PRA Category 1 CMEs: https://earnc.me/Daw1w2
---
SHOW NOTES
In this episode, urologist Dr. Claus Roehrborn and interventional radiologist Dr. Sandeep Bagla discuss benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate artery embolization (PAE) in the context of counseling patients and cross-specialty collaboration.
Dr. Roehrborn starts by reviewing the history of BPH treatment, from medications like alpha-blockers and anticholinergics, to minimally invasive options like UroLift, Rezum, and PAE. He emphasizes that the latter options are growing in popularity, since they provide treatment alternatives for patients who are concerned about side effects from medications, or have not experienced symptom relief from medications.
Dr. Sandeep Bagla describes Prostate Cancer USA’s philosophy on IR/Urology partnership and how it can ultimately benefit patients. This model provides the patient with both an IR suite for the PAE procedure and a urology clinic for diagnostic assessment, determination of PAE candidacy, and follow-up assessment.
Both doctors describe ideal patients for PAE. These are usually patients with a gland size above 60 g, confirmed bladder function, and a desire to preserve ejaculation function. Contraindications include urinary retention, chronic prostatitis, and heavily calcified glands.
Finally, they describe how they manage minor short-term complications such as frequency and dysuria with medication. They track symptom relief using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Dr. Bagla notes that the largest drop in IPSS usually occurs about 4-5 weeks post-procedure.
---
RESOURCES
Prostate Centers USA: https://www.prostatecentersusa.com/
“The Role of Novel Minimally Invasive Treatments for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Associated with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia”:
https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bju.15154
1,301 Listeners
2,432 Listeners
3,332 Listeners
7,928 Listeners
5,436 Listeners
219 Listeners
279 Listeners
14 Listeners
15,237 Listeners
3 Listeners
4 Listeners
10,556 Listeners
2 Listeners
0 Listeners
1,144 Listeners