
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
This episode focuses on Article 16.8, which deals with review of discipline. Corey explains the importance of this article and how it can be used to challenge management decisions. He points out that any disciplinary action, such as a suspension or discharge, must be reviewed and concurred by a manager who is a higher level than the supervisor who initiated the discipline. This review should be independent, not a rubber stamp. He also suggests that if an arbitrator says that a disciplinary action is not a "de minimus" violation, then it is a fatal flaw and management's case may be thrown out.
4.9
562562 ratings
This episode focuses on Article 16.8, which deals with review of discipline. Corey explains the importance of this article and how it can be used to challenge management decisions. He points out that any disciplinary action, such as a suspension or discharge, must be reviewed and concurred by a manager who is a higher level than the supervisor who initiated the discipline. This review should be independent, not a rubber stamp. He also suggests that if an arbitrator says that a disciplinary action is not a "de minimus" violation, then it is a fatal flaw and management's case may be thrown out.
621 Listeners
10,924 Listeners
27,072 Listeners
918 Listeners
8 Listeners
52 Listeners
87 Listeners
102 Listeners
79 Listeners
11 Listeners
13 Listeners
42 Listeners
18 Listeners
17 Listeners
34 Listeners