Equipped for Life Podcast

In this episode Tim gives a fuller explanation of the argument Josh presented in the course about avoiding burden of proof shifts, and responds to likely counter-arguments. For example, doesn’t the dialogue style Tim is teaching allow the pro-choice person to have too much of an advantage, or allow them to take too much control of the conversation?

Josh and Rachel respond to the common question of what to do when the person you're talking to "bites a bullet," by saying something like, "Maybe we can kill toddlers sometimes," or "maybe squirrels are persons." They also briefly discuss how to respond to utilitarians and moral relativists, who often bite bullets.

Related Links:

When and How You Should End Unproductive Conversations: http://bit.ly/2vTuKLo

Bodily Rights Arguments Necessitate Extremism: http://bit.ly/2rv5ju8

Fellow Pro-Lifers: Please Stop Sharing This Straw Man Meme: http://bit.ly/2gBf9XR

Thanos Would Be Pro-Choice: http://bit.ly/2H8zONi

Effectively Responding to Moral Relativism: http://bit.ly/2gsqidj

Relating to Relativists: http://bit.ly/2ymoNsr

ERI Website: https://EqualRightsInstitute.com

ERI Blog: https://Blog.EqualRightsInstitute.com

Equipped for Life Course: https://EquippedCourse.com

Sidewalk Counseling Masterclass: http://SidewalkCounselingMasterclass.com

Josh and Rachel explain why they're relaunching the Equipped for Life Podcast and moving most of it into a public podcast feed, and what to expect in the future.

Podcaser token: dVvz89pf1aMqgNsI2VzE