In this episode, Canon Megan and Adam take on one of the trickiest theological questions out there: What does it really mean to say that God is sovereign?

They dive into the influence of Arthur Pink’s writing and it's influence modern Reformed theology, the challenges of hyper-Calvinism, and how different traditions—including Episcopalians (and Anglicanism) —understand God’s power, justice, and love. Spoiler: not everyone sees God as a puppet master pulling every string.

Instead, Megan and Adam offer a vision of a God who chooses relationship over control—and who gives us freedom not in spite of divine sovereignty, but because of it.

What You’ll Walk Away With:

• God’s sovereignty is one of the most debated concepts in Christianity—and there’s more than one way to understand it.
• Arthur Pink’s take has shaped a lot of modern evangelical thought, especially in more rigid theological circles.
• Hyper-Calvinism can make God seem distant, coercive, or even unloving—but that’s not the only option.
• The Anglican tradition sees sovereignty through the lens of love, not domination.
• Free will isn’t a threat to God’s power—it’s a gift from God that makes relationship possible.
• You can’t talk about sovereignty without also talking about God’s justice, mercy, and character.
• Theology doesn’t happen in a vacuum—history and context matter.
• True power doesn’t need to control everything. Sometimes, power looks like choosing to let others choose.
• God isn’t a puppet master—God is a partner in love and liberation.
• When we talk about God, the words we use really matter—and so does the story we’re telling with them.

If you’ve ever wondered how to make sense of God’s will, human freedom, or whether everything really “happens for a reason”—this episode is for you.

AI Disclosure: To support our staff in their limited time, many of our episode summaries are first generated by AI and then edited by the Communications Director to accurately reflect and preview our podcast episodes.

(aka There's Something About… well, you get it)

Canon Megan and Adam take on one of the most iconic—and sometimes misunderstood—figures in Christianity: the Virgin Mary.

They explore how Mary has been seen over the centuries, from quiet mother to bold revolutionary. Whether it’s the Magnificat turning the world upside down, or the many cultural depictions of Mary through time, this conversation invites us to look beyond the stereotypes and see Mary’s real, radical significance.

She’s not just a symbol—she’s a person. And for many of us, she’s one of the most relatable, powerful figures in the whole story of the Christian faith.

What You’ll Walk Away With:

• Marian devotion is very much a part of Episcopal tradition—though how it looks can vary widely from person to person.
• Mary is honored as Theotokos—the God-bearer—in creedal liturgical churches (yes, that includes Episcopalians!).
• Her song, the Magnificat, is so revolutionary it’s been banned in different times and places throughout history.
• How Mary is portrayed often says more about us than about her—especially when it comes to questions of women’s agency in the church.
• Around the world, Mary shows up in art, prayer, and culture as a symbol of hope, especially for the poor and oppressed.
• The early church held Mary in high regard—but that reverence got dialed back after the Reformation.
• Scripture gives us glimpses into Mary’s interior life, making her one of the most emotionally rich and relatable figures in the Bible.
• Mary’s deep humanity helps people connect with her as more than just a theological symbol.
• The Episcopal Church encourages personal expressions of piety—and yes, that can include Marian devotion.
• Mary’s presence in scripture quietly but powerfully pushes back on traditional portrayals of women in faith stories.

If you’ve ever wondered what to make of Mary—or just want a deeper, more thoughtful take on her story—this one is for you.

AI Disclosure: To support our staff in their limited time, many of our episode summaries are first generated by AI and then edited by the Communications Director to accurately reflect and preview our podcast episodes.

In this episode, Canon Megan and Adam shine a spotlight on someone you really ought to know—Frances Perkins. She was the first woman to serve in a U.S. presidential cabinet, a driving force behind the New Deal, and an Episcopalian whose faith shaped her fierce commitment to justice.
They dig into her early life, her time as a labor activist, and how a moment in a New York church changed everything. Frances wasn’t just a policymaker—she was a public servant on a mission, grounded in the belief that faith should mean something for real people in real need.
If you've ever wondered what holiness looks like in politics, Frances Perkins is a pretty great place to start.
---
What You’ll Walk Away With:
Frances Perkins was the first woman in the U.S. cabinet—Secretary of Labor under FDR.
Her work helped create the social safety net we still rely on today, including Social Security and the 40-hour work week.
She was deeply influenced by the Episcopal Church and saw her work as a calling.
A tragic fire in New York City helped shape her lifelong commitment to workers' rights.
Perkins believed that public policy could—and should—be an expression of compassion and justice.
She wasn’t always welcomed with open arms, but she stayed the course.
Her legacy lives on in labor protections, social welfare programs, and the fight for women’s rights.
Frances reminds us that sainthood doesn’t always look like a halo—it can look like a woman in a sensible suit, getting things done.
If you’ve ever wondered whether you’re inherently bad (you’re not), or just want a clearer understanding of why Christians talk about original sin at all—this is a great place to start.
AI Disclosure: To support our staff in their limited time, many of our episode summaries are first generated by AI and then edited by the Communications Director to accurately reflect and preview our podcast episodes.

In this episode, Canon Megan and Adam wade into one of the church’s most misunderstood—and most loaded—topics: original sin. Where did it come from? What does it actually mean? And is it really as bad as it sounds?
From Augustine’s personal baggage to Calvin’s famously gloomy outlook, they explore how different Christian traditions have understood sin, human nature, and our relationship with God. Along the way, they reflect on the tension between the beauty of being human and the brokenness of the world we live in.
Don’t worry—this isn’t all doom and gloom. There's grace, hope, and a reminder that the Episcopal tradition offers a more compassionate and complex take than you might expect.
What You’ll Walk Away With:
* Original sin is less about one bad choice in a garden and more about the deep brokenness we all live with.
* The idea has changed a lot over time, depending on who you ask (and when).
* Augustine’s views on sin were deeply shaped by his own life story.
* The Church tends to offer a more hopeful view of original sin than many people realize.
* The Protestant reformers, especially Calvin, went much further—emphasizing the idea of total depravity.
* Calvin’s theology paints a pretty harsh picture of human nature.
* Original sin isn’t just personal—it can help explain larger, systemic problems in the world.
* Even in the midst of brokenness, there’s still goodness in humanity worth holding onto.
* This whole conversation points us toward the grace of God, not away from it.
* The Episcopal Church holds a nuanced, thoughtful view of sin that leaves room for growth, hope, and redemption.

If you’ve ever wondered whether you’re inherently bad (you’re not), or just want a clearer understanding of why Christians talk about original sin at all—this is a great place to start.
AI Disclosure: To support our staff in their limited time, many of our episode summaries are first generated by AI and then edited by the Communications Director to accurately reflect and preview our podcast episodes.

In this episode, Canon Megan and Adam dive into one of the biggest theological questions out there: *what actually happens when we die?* And yes—we go there about pets, too.
From ancient Christian beliefs to how the plague reshaped everyone’s ideas about heaven and hell, we trace how our understanding of the afterlife got so complicated. Along the way, we talk about purgatory, limbo, grace, and how the church has tried (sometimes not so helpfully) to make sense of it all.
It’s a surprisingly compassionate conversation that reminds us theology isn’t about fear—it’s about love, hope, and trust in a God who isn’t finished with us yet.
What You’ll Walk Away With:
* The question “do animals go to heaven?” has been debated for centuries—and there’s no one answer.
* Classical thinkers like Thomas Aquinas said no, because animals don’t have immortal souls.
* In early Christianity, people weren’t fixated on the afterlife—the focus was on redeeming the world here and now.
* After the plague devastated Europe, people became much more concerned with individual salvation and what comes next.
* A lot of what we imagine about hell comes not from Scripture, but from Dante’s *Inferno* and Milton’s *Paradise Lost.*
* Purgatory was understood not as punishment, but as a place of growth and transformation in God’s love.
* The Episcopal Church doesn’t have a rigid stance on the afterlife, and leans into grace rather than certainty.
* There’s an important difference between theology (exploring big ideas) and doctrine (official teaching).
* Theology should be pastoral—it should help people, not scare them.
* Talking about salvation and the afterlife should always come from a place of compassion.
If you’ve ever wrestled with questions about heaven, hell, or whether your dog will greet you at the pearly gates, this one’s for you.
AI Disclosure: To support our staff in their limited time, many of our episode summaries are first generated by AI and then edited by the Communications Director to accurately reflect and preview our podcast episodes.

This week, Megan and Adam are cracking open one of the big questions of Episcopal/Anglican church life: what even is the Anglican Communion, and how does it work? Spoiler alert: it’s kind of like a big family reunion where no one can tell you what to do, but everyone has strong opinions anyway.
We’re talking ancient history (hello, Church of England), global growth (shoutout to indigenous clergy making Anglicanism their own), and modern-day drama (yes, we’re going there—Gene Robinson, LGBTQ+ inclusion, and the Windsor Report). Plus, we unpack why the Episcopal Church in the U.S. runs more like a town hall than a monarchy.
If you’ve ever wondered who’s in charge, why it feels like no one agrees, or how this beautiful, chaotic communion actually holds together—this episode is for you.
💡 What You’ll Walk Away With:
🌍 The Anglican Communion is more like a group chat of churches than a top-down empire.
🎩 The Archbishop of Canterbury is kind of like the group chat admin—respected, but not the boss.
🕰️ It all started with Henry VIII and the Church of England. (Yes, the one with all the divorces.)
🤝 Each church in the Communion is self-governing—no one gets to tell the others what to do.
🌱 Indigenous clergy have helped Anglicanism grow roots in different cultures around the world.
🗳️ The Episcopal Church does things the democratic way—think elections, not appointments.
🏳️‍🌈 When Gene Robinson became the first openly gay bishop, it shook things up big time.
📄 The Windsor Report tried to make peace... and kind of didn’t.
🫂 In the Episcopal Church, authority comes from the people. Leadership is about trust, not titles.
✨ Anglicanism is all about local context, pastoral care, and keeping community at the heart of it all.
Whether you're an Anglican nerd or just wondering how a global church can both argue and stay united, we’re here to break it down.
AI Disclosure: To support our staff in their limited time, many of our episode summaries are first generated by AI and then edited by the Communications Director to accurately reflect and preview our podcast episodes.

Summary
This week on For the Rest of Us, Canon Megan and Adam take us through the life of Dietrich Bonhoeffer—a man who went from quiet German theologian to full-blown resistance fighter plotting against Hitler. Yes, you read that right.
They get into all the twists and turns: his early church days, the unexpected soul-shaking experience he had in a Harlem church, and how he helped lead a group of Christians who weren’t about to let the Nazis take over Jesus.
There’s also a secret seminary, some major ethical drama (Can a Christian be part of an assassination plot?), and a legacy that gets misunderstood way too often in today’s headlines. Basically, it's like a theological spy thriller—with a conscience.
Takeaways
🤯 Bonhoeffer literally got involved in a plot to kill Hitler. Not exactly your average Sunday sermon.
🎶 His time in a Black church in Harlem changed his faith forever—he left America with a new fire for justice.
✊ He believed the Church should stop talking about doing the right thing and just do it.
🚫 He wasn’t cool with Nazis using Christianity as a political tool. So he started a resistance church.
🕵️‍♂️ He ran a secret seminary to train pastors who weren’t down with nationalism.
😬 He seriously wrestled with the morality of violence—and didn’t take any of it lightly.
😒 People today love to quote him... usually out of context.
📢 His message? The Church can’t be silent when power goes off the rails.
🧨 European Christianity tanked, partly because it got too cozy with nationalism. Bonhoeffer saw it coming.
AI Disclosure: To support our staff in their limited time, many of our episode summaries are first generated by AI and then edited by the Communications Director to accurately reflect and preview our podcast episodes.

Content Warning: some of the topics discussed in this episode mention of America's history of race-based violence and may be considered graphic to some listeners. Please practice caution, especially with younger audiences.
Summary
In this episode, Megan and Adam explore the complex topic of atonement theory within Christianity, discussing various interpretations from historical figures like Anselm and Calvin to modern perspectives. They delve into the implications of these theories on the understanding of Jesus' sacrifice, the significance of Old Testament sacrifices, and the broader themes of scapegoating and mimetic desire. The conversation emphasizes the importance of gratitude in sacrifice and the hope found in the resurrection, particularly within the context of the Episcopal Church.
Takeaways
-Atonement theory explains how Jesus' life and death achieved salvation.
-Satisfaction Theory by Anselm views God as a feudal lord needing honor.
-Calvin's Penal Substitutionary Atonement emphasizes God's justice and wrath.
-Old Testament sacrifices were about gratitude, not appeasing an angry God.
-Christus Victor portrays Jesus as a fighter against evil and death.
-Jesus as the new Adam resets the template for humanity.
-Scapegoating is a cycle of violence that Jesus illustrates as fruitless.
-Episcopalian views embrace multiple atonement theories without strict adherence.
-Gratitude in sacrifice reflects a relationship with God, not fear of punishment.
-The resurrection signifies hope and triumph over oppressive systems.
Chapters
00:00 Introduction to Atonement Theory
02:58 Satisfaction Theory: Anselm's Perspective
05:49 Penal Substitutionary Atonement: Calvin's Interpretation
09:00 Old Testament Sacrifices and Their Significance
11:52 The Christus Victor Theory
15:03 The Role of Jesus as the New Adam
17:47 Scapegoating and Mimetic Desire
20:52 Episcopalian Views on Atonement
23:51 The Importance of Gratitude in Sacrifice
26:53 Historical Context of Atonement Theories
29:47 Conclusion: Hope and Resurrection
AI Disclosure: To support our staff in their limited time, many of our episode summaries are first generated by AI and then edited by the Communications Director to accurately reflect and preview our podcast episodes.

Link to "To Set Our Hope On Christ": https://cnyepiscopal.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/to-set-our-hope-on-christ.pdf
Summary
In this episode, Megan and Adam continue their discussion on gay marriage within the context of the Episcopal Church. They explore biblical examples of same-sex relationships, the importance of lived experiences in shaping church perspectives, and the intersection of church and state in marriage. The conversation emphasizes the positive aspects of love and commitment in same-sex relationships and challenges traditional views on marriage.
Takeaways
-The Episcopal Church is working to build a positive case for gay marriage.
-Biblical narratives contain examples of same-gender relationships that reflect love and commitment.
-Lived experiences of LGBTQ+ individuals have transformed church perspectives on marriage.
-The story of Ruth and Naomi exemplifies fidelity and commitment in relationships.
-David and Jonathan's relationship showcases deep emotional bonds beyond friendship.
-Jesus' interactions with marginalized individuals highlight acceptance and love.
-The church's historical context influences its current stance on marriage.
-Witnessing acts of love and care in the LGBTQ+ community can change perceptions.
-The intersection of church and state raises questions about marriage officiation.
-Christianity should promote love and not be destructive to relationships.
Chapters
00:00 Introduction to the Discussion on Gay Marriage
01:50 Building a Positive Case for Gay Marriage
03:49 Biblical Examples of Same-Sex Relationships
12:45 The Role of Lived Experience in Changing Perspectives
19:24 Witnessing Love and Care in the LGBTQ+ Community
25:04 The Intersection of Church and State in Marriage
27:37 Continuing the Discussion on Marriage and Faith
AI Disclosure: To support our staff in their limited time, many of our episode summaries are first generated by AI and then edited by the Communications Director to accurately reflect and preview our podcast episodes.

Summary
In this episode of 'For the Rest of Us', Megan Castellan and Adam delve into the complex topic of gay marriage within the Episcopal Church. They explore the historical and theological perspectives surrounding marriage, particularly focusing on the interpretation of scripture, including the controversial 'clobber verses' often cited against LGBTQ inclusion. The conversation emphasizes the evolving understanding of marriage, the importance of joy in relationships, and the need for a more inclusive interpretation of biblical texts. This is part one of a two-part series, setting the stage for a deeper exploration of the positive case for gay marriage in the next episode.
Takeaways
-The conversation will address common questions and misconceptions about gay marriage.
-The first part focuses on deconstructing negative arguments against gay marriage.
-Clobber verses are often used to argue against LGBTQ inclusion.
-Leviticus presents a worldview that differs from modern understandings of sexuality.
-Romans 1 is often misinterpreted in discussions about homosexuality.
-Marriage in the Bible has historically included various forms and practices.
-The concept of marriage has evolved over time, reflecting cultural changes.
-Joy and mutual support are essential aspects of marriage according to Anglican theology.
-The conversation sets the stage for a positive case for gay marriage in part two.
Chapters
00:00 Introduction to the Conversation
01:06 Understanding Gay Marriage in the Episcopal Church
02:47 Deconstructing Clobber Verses
06:01 The Context of Leviticus and Its Relevance
08:52 Exploring Romans 1 and Its Implications
11:58 The Evolution of Marriage in Scripture
14:57 The Misinterpretation of Sodom and Gomorrah
17:53 The Church's View on Marriage and Procreation
20:56 The Role of Joy in Marriage
24:02 Theological Perspectives on Marriage
27:02 Conclusion and Preview of Part Two
AI Disclosure: To support our staff in their limited time, many of our episode summaries are first generated by AI and then edited by the Communications Director to accurately reflect and preview our podcast episodes.