The possibility of a fresh trial for Alex Murdaugh, stemming from allegations of jury tampering, is rapidly unfolding. The situation, as elucidated in the "Hidden Killers" podcast featuring Tony Brueski and former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani, is gathering increased scrutiny and speculation.

 

 After his conviction, the Murdaugh defense appealed, which removed the trial court's jurisdiction. The drama heightened when accusations about a court clerk, Ms. Hill, allegedly tampering with the jury were brought into the spotlight. Rahmani explained, "What really needs to happen is an evidentiary hearing... the judge is gonna talk to the juror who was dismissed, the clerk, and get information."

 

 Given the structure of the appellate court, which doesn't allow witness testimonies or in-depth inquiries into parties, the South Carolina appellate court made a pivotal move. "They've essentially sent the case down to the trial court... to conduct a hearing on the motion for a new trial," Rahmani added.

 

 The crux of the matter pivots around the conflicting affidavits. The burning question is: Was there a grave felony jury tampering incident, or are there individuals misleading the court? The coming hearings promise to be electrifying, with observers keenly watching whether the implicated clerk will plead the fifth, which would mean invoking her right against self-incrimination.

 

 Referring to similar events during the Scott Peterson trial, Rahmani highlighted the possibility of the court granting the clerk immunity, which might upend the entire prosecution's stance. The core argument hinges on the alleged ex-parte communications from the clerk, instructing jurors to disregard Alex Murdaugh's statements. Brueski emphasized, "If this sort of thing took place in court... you would have to go down that road [of a new trial] as well."

 

 The looming specter of a new trial beckons further examination. Might the defense introduce fresh angles and perspectives, or will the courtroom be privy to a déjà vu experience? Rahmani voiced skepticism about the possibility of a wholly new defense strategy for Murdaugh, considering he's already testified and "locked himself in" during the first trial.

 

 Interestingly, Rahmani pointed to the prosecutorial strategy, which might use Murdaugh's admitted financial crimes as a motive for the alleged murders. "Now that the financial crimes have been proven... I think it'll be a much faster trial," he stated.

 

 Brueski posed another significant query: Would the admission of these financial crimes into a new trial, now that Murdaugh has confessed, change the trajectory of the proceedings? Rahmani believes the financial crimes' entry into a new trial would be streamlined, with less focus on external testimonies and financial documents. But he was firm in his assessment of the evidence's potential impact. "If the jurors don't like him, and they did not like him because of all these financial crimes, he doesn't have a chance," Rahmani stated.

 

 When asked about repainting Alex Murdaugh's image in anticipation of a potential new trial, Rahmani's advice was forthright: "You got to own it." Accepting Murdaugh's transgressions while drawing a distinction between his financial indiscretions and the gravity of murder might be the defense's most formidable argument.

 

 As the legal gears shift and twist, the question remains: Can the true essence of justice be distilled amidst the tumult of allegations, admissions, and public opinion?

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com