
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this seminar we will talk with Yves Citton about his books Mythocracy: How Stories Shape Our World, Mediarchy, and Spinoza et les Social Sciences: De la Puissance de la multitude à l’économie des affects (co-edited with Frédéric Lordon), and about the myths that dominate contemporary thought, how they are disseminated, and how and understanding of the intersection of affects, attention, and imagination might help us combat the right wing myths of individuality, nation, and race that dominate modern thought.
Among many other things, Spinoza was a critic of the superstitions of his time such as the idea of an anthropomorphic god, miracles, and the divine providence of states, revealing where these ideas came from and how they reinforce existing power structures. As astute as his criticisms were, they often seem relegated to a different time in which scripture was the primary source of intellectual authority, and the written word was the means of transmission of superstition. What does Spinoza’s understanding of superstition, imagination, and the affects mean in an age of digital video and social media?
This seminar is part of our dedicated sub-series, From Marx to Spinoza: Affect, Ideology, Materiality.
For more information about Culture, Power and Politics see: culturepowerpolitics.org
If you can support us with a small regular donation, please do so here.
If you’d like to make a one-time donation, please do so here.
Btc donations: bc1q64590fsdzxe7rmfgp7f2jc97v7rp8fr4n0lspf
By Jeremy Gilbert4.7
2121 ratings
In this seminar we will talk with Yves Citton about his books Mythocracy: How Stories Shape Our World, Mediarchy, and Spinoza et les Social Sciences: De la Puissance de la multitude à l’économie des affects (co-edited with Frédéric Lordon), and about the myths that dominate contemporary thought, how they are disseminated, and how and understanding of the intersection of affects, attention, and imagination might help us combat the right wing myths of individuality, nation, and race that dominate modern thought.
Among many other things, Spinoza was a critic of the superstitions of his time such as the idea of an anthropomorphic god, miracles, and the divine providence of states, revealing where these ideas came from and how they reinforce existing power structures. As astute as his criticisms were, they often seem relegated to a different time in which scripture was the primary source of intellectual authority, and the written word was the means of transmission of superstition. What does Spinoza’s understanding of superstition, imagination, and the affects mean in an age of digital video and social media?
This seminar is part of our dedicated sub-series, From Marx to Spinoza: Affect, Ideology, Materiality.
For more information about Culture, Power and Politics see: culturepowerpolitics.org
If you can support us with a small regular donation, please do so here.
If you’d like to make a one-time donation, please do so here.
Btc donations: bc1q64590fsdzxe7rmfgp7f2jc97v7rp8fr4n0lspf

290 Listeners

1,449 Listeners

171 Listeners

1,569 Listeners

210 Listeners

581 Listeners

179 Listeners

557 Listeners

53 Listeners

199 Listeners

262 Listeners

18 Listeners

347 Listeners

27 Listeners

24 Listeners