Get in the Game Podcast from Jury Analyst

Send us Fan Mail

This Best of Get in the Game episode brings together standout insights from leading plaintiff trial attorneys on what it really takes to prepare, frame, and try high-stakes cases. Featuring clips from Rex Parris, Dale Galipo, Ben Cloward, Keith Mitnik, John Uustal, Arash Homampour, Benjamin Crump, Russell Nicolet, and others, this episode highlights the practical trial wisdom, preparation habits, and courtroom strategies that shape powerful plaintiff advocacy.

What This Episode Covers

• How jurors read lawyers, clients, and the courtroom before testimony begins
• Why simple, direct storytelling matters in the age of short attention spans
• How to address bad facts, bias, and juror skepticism early
• Why focus groups and mock juries help reveal hidden case weaknesses
• How voir dire can uncover subtle bias without making jurors defensive
• Why opening statements must give jurors context for the evidence
• How authenticity, visual storytelling, and damages confidence shape persuasion
• Why venue-specific preparation matters in serious plaintiff cases
• How collaboration within the plaintiff bar strengthens trial strategy

Send us Fan Mail

The idea that one piece of evidence wins a case is a myth. The trial lawyers securing the most significant verdicts today operate with a different understanding. Jurors do not decide cases based on facts alone. They decide based on how those facts are framed, sequenced, and ultimately understood.

This episode distills insights from some of the most respected plaintiff trial lawyers in the country, all featured on Get in the Game with Brian Panish. It highlights the strategic shift from instinct-driven advocacy to structured, data-informed trial preparation.

In this episode, you’ll learn:

• Why evidence alone is not persuasive without the right interpretive framework
• How sequencing and narrative architecture influence liability decisions
• What jurors retain and why most information is lost without structure
• How leading trial teams use focus groups and behavioral data to test cases in advance
• Why traditional emotional appeals can limit damages instead of increasing them
• How to position damages as a question of value and justice, not just compensation

Featuring insights from:
Ben Cloward
Keith Mitnik
John Taylor
Arash Homampour
Dale Galipo
Rex Parris
Russell Nicolet
John Uustal
Benjamin Crump

Each of these trial lawyers has been featured on Get in the Game with Brian Panish, where they break down their approach to high-stakes litigation and verdict strategy.

👉 Explore their full conversations in their respective episodes:
 https://getinthegame.juryanalyst.com/

Send us Fan Mail

The upcoming podcast from our sister department group discusses a significant shift in how legal trials are prepared, indicating a departure from past methods. This transformation is driven by the emergence of advanced tools, which are fundamentally changing the approach to trial readiness. As a result, a growing disparity is observed between conventional, often experience-based preparation and newer, scientifically-backed methodologies. Relying on outdated, anecdotal strategies is becoming increasingly disadvantageous as more sophisticated, data-driven techniques gain prominence in the legal field.

https://scienceofjustice.com/

Send us Fan Mail

 Brian Panish interviews Carmen Balber, the Executive Director of Consumer Watchdog, a nonprofit organization focused on protecting the interests of consumers and holding corporations accountable. Carmen has been a powerful voice in the fight for consumer rights, particularly in the areas of insurance, healthcare, and corporate responsibility. 

Send us Fan Mail

What separates truly exceptional trial lawyers from the rest? It's rarely what they teach in law school.

Six accomplished courtroom veterans—Brian Panish, Sean Flaherty, Keith Mitnik, Jason Leonard, John Uustal, and Joshua Koskoff—share candid insights drawn from decades of high-stakes litigation. Their collective wisdom forms a practical roadmap for attorneys at any stage, but especially those working to establish themselves in the challenging world of trial advocacy.

The journey begins earlier than many realize. These attorneys emphasize the transformative power of immersing yourself in legal practice during law school, absorbing the unwritten rules and developing intuitive skills through proximity and observation. Yet they remain refreshingly honest about the timeline—expect to "tread water" for several years before hitting your stride. Even veterans with decades of experience admit to experiencing pre-trial anxiety. The difference? They've learned to function effectively despite it.

For new lawyers preparing for their first courtroom experiences, the advice challenges conventional wisdom. Perfection isn't necessary—authenticity is. When you thoroughly prepare and genuinely believe in your case, minor technical imperfections actually make you more relatable to jurors. This permission to be human while maintaining high professional standards liberates attorneys to focus on what truly matters: thorough preparation, strategic case framing, and passionate advocacy.

Beyond the courtroom, success requires intentional networking, exceptional client service, and embracing collaborative approaches. The strongest advocates recognize that mentorship and knowledge-sharing create collective strength against well-resourced opponents. Through every challenge, maintaining your authentic voice while incorporating lessons from those who came before creates a sustainable foundation for a meaningful career in trial law.

Ready to transform your approach to trial advocacy? Subscribe now for more practical insights from the profession's most accomplished practitioners.

Send us Fan Mail

When high-stakes trials involve punitive damages, the real battle often begins long before opening statements. In this episode, we unpack the overlooked art of selecting a jury that’s equipped—not just to assess liability—but to deliver meaningful punishment when it's warranted. From religious objections to financial bias, from voir dire blind spots to strategic pretrial motions, we explore how trial lawyers can avoid critical mistakes and build a jury prepared for both phases of trial.

Featuring insights from guest expert Sean Simpson, author of Punitive Damages: The Lawyer’s Tool for Shaping Society, this episode reveals why jury selection is never just about liability—it’s about everything that comes after.

Send us Fan Mail

The first words in a trial can make or break your case. This Best of episode analyzes some of the top litigators' most compelling opening statements. Learn how expert trial lawyers use storytelling, framing, and strategic pacing to build trust, dismantle defenses, and ensure jurors see the case from their perspective from the very start. Listen to some of the greats as they talk to Panish about it all. 

Send us Fan Mail

This podcast episode discusses California wildfire litigation, focusing on the legal claims, evidence, and challenges in proving liability against utility companies. Plaintiff attorneys describe common claims (negligence and inverse condemnation), damages (property destruction, landscaping, economic and non-economic losses), and the difficulties of proving liability due to destroyed evidence. The bankruptcy of PG&E is examined as a case study, highlighting the unfairness of the bankruptcy system for wildfire victims. Finally, watch a preview replay(Prior to the 2025 LA Wildfires) of a full interview with plaintiff attorneys Mike Kelly and Gerry Singleton, who have extensive backgrounds in fire litigation.

Send us Fan Mail

Unlock courtroom success with our latest podcast episode, where we explore the innovative Jury Simulator tool transforming trial preparation. Learn how machine intelligence creates virtual focus groups with AI-powered jurors, enabling attorneys to test and refine their strategies in a sophisticated and cost-effective manner. Hear firsthand from lawyers who use this technology to anticipate juror reactions and uncover case weaknesses, while AI analyzes demographic data, social media activity, and cognitive biases to provide a realistic glimpse into jury behavior. Discover how the Jury Simulator blends human insight with machine intelligence to enhance legal strategies, from virtual focus groups to real-time feedback during depositions, revolutionizing legal practice and paving the way for a future where technology and tradition work together to ensure fairer, more informed judicial decisions.

For a deeper dive into these groundbreaking advancements and their impact on the legal field, listen to the full story on our sister podcast station, Science of Justice. Gain exclusive insights, expert interviews, and comprehensive analyses that will enrich your understanding of how technology is reshaping justice.

Learn more @ https://scienceofjustice.com/

Send us Fan Mail

Listen to the full episode at : ScienceofJustice.com 

At the SoJ, we believe in simplifying legal proceedings while prioritizing unbiased examination of evidence and human experience. Through our expert interviews, we provide valuable insight into juror perception, enabling informed decision-making. Our focus on Real Science, Real Data, in Real-Time ensures accuracy and timeliness.

New episodes at ScienceofJustice.com