
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Greenland’s substantial reserves of rare earth elements and other critical raw materials have become a prominent aspect of geopolitical posturing in the Arctic. For many observers, the Trump administration’s interest in acquiring Greenland has been driven in large part by a desire to secure access to strategic minerals and reduce U.S. dependence on Chinese supply chains. The European Union likewise sees Arctic natural resources as a means for reducing dependency on China.
But how viable is large-scale resource development in Greenland? What political, economic, environmental and logistical obstacles stand in the way? And how significant is China’s current Arctic engagement compared to several years ago when it actively pursued mining ventures, infrastructure investments, and scientific cooperation across Greenland and the wider region?
In this special episode of Polar Geopolitics, recorded at the Arctic Frontiers conference, we explore these questions with two leading experts. Gørild Heggelund, Research Professor and China specialist at the Fridtjof Nansen Institute, and Nick Bæk Heilmann, Senior Associate at Kaya Partners in Copenhagen, offer insights into Greenland’s resource potential, the strategic competition surrounding critical minerals, and the evolving role of China in the Arctic.
Polar Geopolitics on Twitter / X: @polargeopol
Polar Geopolitics on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/polargeopolitics
Polar Geopolitics on SubStack: https://polargeopolitics.substack.com/
Polar Geopolitics YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@PolarGeopolitics
Polar Geopolitics on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/polargeopolitics/
Polar Geopolitics website: http://www.polargeopolitics.com
Polar Geopolitics on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/polargeopolitics
Polar Geopolitics on PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=KXUVZKGALMFXU
By Eric Paglia4.8
1616 ratings
Greenland’s substantial reserves of rare earth elements and other critical raw materials have become a prominent aspect of geopolitical posturing in the Arctic. For many observers, the Trump administration’s interest in acquiring Greenland has been driven in large part by a desire to secure access to strategic minerals and reduce U.S. dependence on Chinese supply chains. The European Union likewise sees Arctic natural resources as a means for reducing dependency on China.
But how viable is large-scale resource development in Greenland? What political, economic, environmental and logistical obstacles stand in the way? And how significant is China’s current Arctic engagement compared to several years ago when it actively pursued mining ventures, infrastructure investments, and scientific cooperation across Greenland and the wider region?
In this special episode of Polar Geopolitics, recorded at the Arctic Frontiers conference, we explore these questions with two leading experts. Gørild Heggelund, Research Professor and China specialist at the Fridtjof Nansen Institute, and Nick Bæk Heilmann, Senior Associate at Kaya Partners in Copenhagen, offer insights into Greenland’s resource potential, the strategic competition surrounding critical minerals, and the evolving role of China in the Arctic.
Polar Geopolitics on Twitter / X: @polargeopol
Polar Geopolitics on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/polargeopolitics
Polar Geopolitics on SubStack: https://polargeopolitics.substack.com/
Polar Geopolitics YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@PolarGeopolitics
Polar Geopolitics on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/polargeopolitics/
Polar Geopolitics website: http://www.polargeopolitics.com
Polar Geopolitics on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/polargeopolitics
Polar Geopolitics on PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=KXUVZKGALMFXU

4,177 Listeners

318 Listeners

175 Listeners

26 Listeners

27 Listeners

107 Listeners

373 Listeners

404 Listeners

511 Listeners

143 Listeners

22 Listeners

488 Listeners

481 Listeners

415 Listeners

2 Listeners