
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode, Gregory M. Dickinson, a Fellow at the Stanford Law School Program in Law, Science and Technology, discusses his article "Rebooting Internet Immunity," which will be published in the George Washington Law Review. Dickinson begins by explaining what Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act does and why it was enacted. He reflects on how it has shaped the evolution of the internet, and why many people increasingly think it needs to be amended or repealed. He proposes a revision of Section 230 to focus the immunity it provides on content moderation, and not more traditional product liability claims.
This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
By CC0/Public Domain4.9
9999 ratings
In this episode, Gregory M. Dickinson, a Fellow at the Stanford Law School Program in Law, Science and Technology, discusses his article "Rebooting Internet Immunity," which will be published in the George Washington Law Review. Dickinson begins by explaining what Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act does and why it was enacted. He reflects on how it has shaped the evolution of the internet, and why many people increasingly think it needs to be amended or repealed. He proposes a revision of Section 230 to focus the immunity it provides on content moderation, and not more traditional product liability claims.
This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

9,238 Listeners

3,530 Listeners

379 Listeners

1,110 Listeners

6,304 Listeners

5,867 Listeners

15,684 Listeners

5,832 Listeners

3,946 Listeners

1,445 Listeners

3,541 Listeners

65 Listeners

399 Listeners

746 Listeners

2,282 Listeners