
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode, Gregory M. Dickinson, a Fellow at the Stanford Law School Program in Law, Science and Technology, discusses his article "Rebooting Internet Immunity," which will be published in the George Washington Law Review. Dickinson begins by explaining what Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act does and why it was enacted. He reflects on how it has shaped the evolution of the internet, and why many people increasingly think it needs to be amended or repealed. He proposes a revision of Section 230 to focus the immunity it provides on content moderation, and not more traditional product liability claims.
This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
By CC0/Public Domain4.9
9999 ratings
In this episode, Gregory M. Dickinson, a Fellow at the Stanford Law School Program in Law, Science and Technology, discusses his article "Rebooting Internet Immunity," which will be published in the George Washington Law Review. Dickinson begins by explaining what Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act does and why it was enacted. He reflects on how it has shaped the evolution of the internet, and why many people increasingly think it needs to be amended or repealed. He proposes a revision of Section 230 to focus the immunity it provides on content moderation, and not more traditional product liability claims.
This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

9,229 Listeners

3,549 Listeners

383 Listeners

1,102 Listeners

6,310 Listeners

5,815 Listeners

15,625 Listeners

5,819 Listeners

3,915 Listeners

1,492 Listeners

3,516 Listeners

66 Listeners

398 Listeners

744 Listeners

2,181 Listeners