
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Harry Miller, former police officer and founder of the campaigning group Fair Cop, discusses his court victory against Humberside Constabulary last year and his current legal challenge in the Court of Appeal which questions the lawfulness of provisions within the “Hate Crime Operational Guidance” (HCOG) published by the College of Policing. Specifically, Miller’s appeal challenges how the HCOG mandates the recording of so-called “non-crime hate incidents” where such allegations have been made against 120,000 people in the UK for which there need not be any evidence of hate for the recording of a “hate incident” while the accused’s record is not only blighted by an accusation that need not be proven but such incidents are not made known to the accused. Miller elaborates how this guidance has had a “chilling effect” on free speech.
By Savage Minds4.5
4747 ratings
Harry Miller, former police officer and founder of the campaigning group Fair Cop, discusses his court victory against Humberside Constabulary last year and his current legal challenge in the Court of Appeal which questions the lawfulness of provisions within the “Hate Crime Operational Guidance” (HCOG) published by the College of Policing. Specifically, Miller’s appeal challenges how the HCOG mandates the recording of so-called “non-crime hate incidents” where such allegations have been made against 120,000 people in the UK for which there need not be any evidence of hate for the recording of a “hate incident” while the accused’s record is not only blighted by an accusation that need not be proven but such incidents are not made known to the accused. Miller elaborates how this guidance has had a “chilling effect” on free speech.

2,278 Listeners

200 Listeners

2,213 Listeners

373 Listeners

3,831 Listeners

656 Listeners

802 Listeners

213 Listeners

142 Listeners

362 Listeners

994 Listeners

239 Listeners

288 Listeners

874 Listeners

62 Listeners