
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


This latest episode of the Harvard Data Science Review Podcast takes a closer look at election polling: how polls are conducted, what they can tell us about voters, and why measuring public opinion has become increasingly challenging. In advance of the Harvard Political Analytics 2026 conference, hosts Liberty Vittert Capito and Xiao-Li Meng are joined by two conference speakers: Anthony Salvanto, CBS News’s director of elections and surveys, and Michael A. Bailey, author of Polling at a Crossroads: Rethinking Modern Survey Research.
From declining response rates and changing turnout patterns to weighting, online panels, and election-night projections, Salvanto and Bailey explore what goes on behind the numbers—and why modern pollsters are increasingly also modelers. They discuss the assumptions and human judgment embedded in polling, the importance of data quality, and the challenge of measuring and communicating uncertainty when traditional measures such as the margin of error tell only part of the story.
The conversation also considers the growing role of prediction markets and what they can—and cannot—add to our understanding of elections and public opinion. Ultimately, the episode asks a larger question: In a rapidly changing polling landscape, how can researchers and the public better understand what the numbers really mean?
Our guests:
This month’s episode of the Harvard Data Science Review Podcast turns the microphone on two people who regularly bring data science, machine learning, and AI to podcast audiences: Katie Malone, host of Linear Digressions, and Jon Krohn, host of SuperDataScience and co-founder and CEO of AI software company Y Carrot. They join us to explore how AI is transforming not only what podcasters talk about, but how podcasts are researched, produced, and shared.
From using AI as a research partner and production “sidecar” to generating episode summaries, newsletters, and animated video, Malone and Krohn share where AI adds real value and where they deliberately keep humans in control. The conversation tackles questions of authenticity, transparency, authorship, and trust, as well as the potential of AI-generated podcasts as personalized tools for learning.
Looking ahead, they consider how AI may reshape podcasting itself: making production easier and more powerful while raising new questions about creativity, human connection, and what audiences will value when anyone can generate professional-quality content on demand.
Our guests:
This month’s episode of the Harvard Data Science Review Podcast takes listeners behind the scenes of Active Industrial Learning, HDSR’s column exploring how data science and AI are applied in real organizations. We speak with column co-editors Hamit Hamutcu and Miguel Paredes about the challenges of translating data science theory into practical business impact.
Drawing on their experiences working with industry leaders, they discuss data and AI literacy, responsible AI, organizational transformation, and the critical role of leadership in successful AI initiatives. The conversation also explores the future of enterprise AI, the value of cross-disciplinary collaboration, and how Active Industrial Learning is evolving to showcase lessons from business, education, the arts, and beyond.
Whether you're leading AI initiatives, building data-driven organizations, or simply interested in how AI succeeds in practice, this episode offers valuable insights into the people, processes, and perspectives shaping the future of applied data science.
Our guests:
This month’s episode of the Harvard Data Science Review Podcast explores the rapidly evolving world of sports analytics and how advances in data science are transforming the way we understand competition. We are joined by Harvard statistician Mark Glickman, creator of the Glicko rating system, and sports statistician Stephanie Kovalchik to discuss the technologies, models, and data driving modern sports.
From real-time player tracking and probabilistic rating systems to AI-assisted coaching and predictive modeling, the conversation examines how statistical methods continue to shape decision-making on and off the field. Glickman and Kovalchik also explore why traditional statistical models remain central to sports analytics, how access to high-quality data continues to limit innovation, and what emerging AI tools may—and may not—bring to the future of the field.
The episode concludes with a look at Recreations in Randomness, HDSR’s column on the many ways data science enriches our recreational lives, and an invitation for readers to contribute new perspectives on the growing role of data in sports, hobbies, and beyond.
Our guests:
This month’s episode of the Harvard Data Science Review Podcast uncorks the fascinating intersection of wine, judgment, and data science. Economist and wine expert Orley Ashenfelter and Master of Wine Susan Lin join us to explore the enduring legacy of the 1976 “Judgment of Paris,” the blind tasting that reshaped perceptions of wine quality and transformed the global wine industry.
From statistical analysis of wine rankings to the psychology of taste perception, the conversation examines how experts evaluate wine and why even trained judges often disagree. Ashenfelter reflects on decades of wine tasting data and the role of probability, humility, and climate modeling in understanding wine quality, while Lin shares insights from her groundbreaking research on how music influences the perception of champagne.
Together, they explore the complex relationship between sensory experience, human judgment, and data, revealing that wine may be as much about context, memory, and emotion as it is about chemistry and statistics.
Our guests:
What can history teach us about today’s AI revolution? In this month’s episode of the Harvard Data Science Review Podcast, we are joined by Stephanie Dick, a historian of science and technology, to explore how past ideas about knowledge and intelligence shape today’s AI systems.
Drawing on examples from early AI, including facial recognition and police databanks, Dick shows that technical decisions are never purely technical—they reflect assumptions about knowledge, people, and power. Tracing AI through three historical “acts,” she challenges the idea that contemporary AI systems represent a clean break from the past.
Dick also questions the pursuit of artificial general intelligence, emphasizing instead that intelligence is plural, embodied, and fundamentally relational.
This conversation offers a fresh perspective for anyone building, studying, or thinking about AI today.
Our guest:
In this month’s episode of the Harvard Data Science Review Podcast, we explore a timeless yet increasingly urgent question: What does it mean to flourish as a human being in an age of artificial intelligence?
We are joined by experts Noreen Herzfeld and Tyler VanderWeele, who together bring empirical, philosophical, and theological perspectives to a wide-ranging conversation on human well-being, relationships, and the role of technology in each.
The guests examine whether AI can support human flourishing—or whether it may erode the very capacities that make flourishing possible. They discuss the limits of AI in addressing deeper human longings for meaning and transcendence, the risks of replacing human connection with artificial interaction, and the ethical responsibilities of developers in shaping these tools.
This episode invites listeners to reflect on what it truly means to live well in a technological age. Join in and add your voice to the conversation.
The episode also highlights Dr. VanderWeele’s recent Psychology Today article, “Can We Remain Human in the Age of AI” and Dr. Herzfeld’s recent writings.
Our guests:
This month on the Harvard Data Science Review Podcast, we explore the data behind modern dating. With millions of swipes happening daily, dating apps promise compatibility through algorithms—but do they really optimize for lasting connection?
Host Liberty Vittert-Capito and guest co-host and HDSR column editor Miguel Paredes sit down with Linx Dating Founder and CEO Amy Andersen and Three Day Rule CEO Adam Cohen-Aslatei to examine the tension between human intuition and algorithmic matching. Drawing on decades of experience and tens of thousands of successful matches, they discuss what people say they want versus what they actually need..
From swipe data to AI-powered date coaching, this episode asks a provocative question: Can technology guide us to love, or is chemistry still beyond the reach of code?
Listen in for a data-driven perspective on romance in the digital age.
Our guests:
Agentic AI is moving beyond assistive tools toward systems that can reason, plan, and act within complex workflows. In the latest episode of the Harvard Data Science Review Podcast, we speak with Dirk Hofmann and Ulla Kruhse-Lehtonen, co-founders and co-CEOs of DAIN Studios, about what this shift means for organizations in practice.
The conversation explores how agentic AI differs from traditional automation, why outcomes matter more than outputs, and how humans and AI agents can work together responsibly. Drawing on their long-standing work in data and AI strategy, Hofmann and Kruhse-Lehtonen offer practical insights into strategy, governance, and the evolving “mindware” required to make agentic AI deliver real value.
The episode also highlights their forthcoming HDSR article, “The Agent-Centric Enterprise: Why 2–10x Productivity Gains Demand Radical Workflow Redesign,” and their joint online course with the Harvard Data Science Initiative, Agentic AI: Contextualized and Applied, which focuses on applying agentic systems responsibly in real organizational settings.
Our guests:
In this month’s episode of the Harvard Data Science Review Podcast, we explore the rapidly evolving concept of digital twins—dynamic, data-driven replicas of complex systems—and their growing influence across engineering, cities, healthcare, and society at large. Blending real-world case studies with big-picture insight, the discussion highlights how real-time data, sophisticated models, and massive computing power converge to let us safely test ideas, anticipate disruptions, and design smarter systems. Just as importantly, the episode tackles the critical questions of ethics, privacy, and public trust, making it an essential listen for anyone interested in where data science is headed—and how it can responsibly shape the world we live in.
Our guests:
From the publisher's feed

1,638 Listeners

1,090 Listeners

146 Listeners

302 Listeners

193 Listeners

338 Listeners

314 Listeners

96 Listeners

553 Listeners

513 Listeners

5,548 Listeners

597 Listeners

138 Listeners

681 Listeners

154 Listeners