
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Full audio of the Supreme Court oral argument in Hencely v. Fluor Corp (No. 24-924), argued November 3, 2025. In this case, an Army specialist injured in a Bagram Airfield bombing sues defense contractor Fluor, and the Justices probe whether "uniquely federal interests" and the FTCA's combatant activities exception can preempt state tort claims against military contractors—even when the contractor allegedly breached its contract and violated military orders. The argument goes to the core of contractor immunity, battlefield accountability, and who pays the price when private companies help wage war.
Check out the official Crime Talk merch at the Crime Talk Store: scottreisch.com/crime-talk-store.
#HencelyvFluor #SCOTUS #SupremeCourt #OralArgument #MilitaryContractors #CrimeTalk
By R. Scott Reisch4.5
485485 ratings
Full audio of the Supreme Court oral argument in Hencely v. Fluor Corp (No. 24-924), argued November 3, 2025. In this case, an Army specialist injured in a Bagram Airfield bombing sues defense contractor Fluor, and the Justices probe whether "uniquely federal interests" and the FTCA's combatant activities exception can preempt state tort claims against military contractors—even when the contractor allegedly breached its contract and violated military orders. The argument goes to the core of contractor immunity, battlefield accountability, and who pays the price when private companies help wage war.
Check out the official Crime Talk merch at the Crime Talk Store: scottreisch.com/crime-talk-store.
#HencelyvFluor #SCOTUS #SupremeCourt #OralArgument #MilitaryContractors #CrimeTalk

8,730 Listeners

857 Listeners

1,284 Listeners

1,113 Listeners

1,565 Listeners

2,449 Listeners

129 Listeners

1,166 Listeners

2,199 Listeners

481 Listeners

909 Listeners

842 Listeners

288 Listeners

913 Listeners

93 Listeners