
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Full audio of the Supreme Court oral argument in Hencely v. Fluor Corp (No. 24-924), argued November 3, 2025. In this case, an Army specialist injured in a Bagram Airfield bombing sues defense contractor Fluor, and the Justices probe whether "uniquely federal interests" and the FTCA's combatant activities exception can preempt state tort claims against military contractors—even when the contractor allegedly breached its contract and violated military orders. The argument goes to the core of contractor immunity, battlefield accountability, and who pays the price when private companies help wage war.
Check out the official Crime Talk merch at the Crime Talk Store: scottreisch.com/crime-talk-store.
#HencelyvFluor #SCOTUS #SupremeCourt #OralArgument #MilitaryContractors #CrimeTalk
By R. Scott Reisch4.5
485485 ratings
Full audio of the Supreme Court oral argument in Hencely v. Fluor Corp (No. 24-924), argued November 3, 2025. In this case, an Army specialist injured in a Bagram Airfield bombing sues defense contractor Fluor, and the Justices probe whether "uniquely federal interests" and the FTCA's combatant activities exception can preempt state tort claims against military contractors—even when the contractor allegedly breached its contract and violated military orders. The argument goes to the core of contractor immunity, battlefield accountability, and who pays the price when private companies help wage war.
Check out the official Crime Talk merch at the Crime Talk Store: scottreisch.com/crime-talk-store.
#HencelyvFluor #SCOTUS #SupremeCourt #OralArgument #MilitaryContractors #CrimeTalk

8,745 Listeners

857 Listeners

1,280 Listeners

1,134 Listeners

1,567 Listeners

2,448 Listeners

130 Listeners

1,170 Listeners

2,215 Listeners

484 Listeners

902 Listeners

840 Listeners

279 Listeners

917 Listeners

96 Listeners