
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Full audio of the Supreme Court oral argument in Hencely v. Fluor Corp (No. 24-924), argued November 3, 2025. In this case, an Army specialist injured in a Bagram Airfield bombing sues defense contractor Fluor, and the Justices probe whether "uniquely federal interests" and the FTCA's combatant activities exception can preempt state tort claims against military contractors—even when the contractor allegedly breached its contract and violated military orders. The argument goes to the core of contractor immunity, battlefield accountability, and who pays the price when private companies help wage war.
Check out the official Crime Talk merch at the Crime Talk Store: scottreisch.com/crime-talk-store.
#HencelyvFluor #SCOTUS #SupremeCourt #OralArgument #MilitaryContractors #CrimeTalk
By R. Scott Reisch4.5
484484 ratings
Full audio of the Supreme Court oral argument in Hencely v. Fluor Corp (No. 24-924), argued November 3, 2025. In this case, an Army specialist injured in a Bagram Airfield bombing sues defense contractor Fluor, and the Justices probe whether "uniquely federal interests" and the FTCA's combatant activities exception can preempt state tort claims against military contractors—even when the contractor allegedly breached its contract and violated military orders. The argument goes to the core of contractor immunity, battlefield accountability, and who pays the price when private companies help wage war.
Check out the official Crime Talk merch at the Crime Talk Store: scottreisch.com/crime-talk-store.
#HencelyvFluor #SCOTUS #SupremeCourt #OralArgument #MilitaryContractors #CrimeTalk

8,541 Listeners

850 Listeners

1,263 Listeners

1,157 Listeners

605 Listeners

1,551 Listeners

2,408 Listeners

1,147 Listeners

2,137 Listeners

483 Listeners

897 Listeners

838 Listeners

308 Listeners

58 Listeners

709 Listeners