
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Dr. Lynn Fynn is a clinical research scientist and a retired infectious disease specialist. We sat down together to discuss issues she sees plaguing medical research, including the misallocation of funds, a broken peer review process, and major conflicts of interest.
”Any time you incentivize something, you’re creating a bias. And when you create a bias, there’s an element of truth that’s removed from the equation,” says Dr. Fynn.
“When a pharmaceutical company gets to pour money into a program, the curriculum is going to reflect what they want it to reflect, to make it a profitable transaction for them. It’s a return on investment.”
What practical steps are needed to restore public trust in science and medicine?
“Where there’s transparency, there’s trust. It’s really that simple,” says Dr. Fynn. “Oftentimes, [in] what used to be the scientific method, the process gets reversed. They look at the conclusion that is agreeable or preferred, and then they start working backwards. How can we prove this conclusion?”
Views expressed in this video are opinions of the host and the guest, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
4.9
11181,118 ratings
Dr. Lynn Fynn is a clinical research scientist and a retired infectious disease specialist. We sat down together to discuss issues she sees plaguing medical research, including the misallocation of funds, a broken peer review process, and major conflicts of interest.
”Any time you incentivize something, you’re creating a bias. And when you create a bias, there’s an element of truth that’s removed from the equation,” says Dr. Fynn.
“When a pharmaceutical company gets to pour money into a program, the curriculum is going to reflect what they want it to reflect, to make it a profitable transaction for them. It’s a return on investment.”
What practical steps are needed to restore public trust in science and medicine?
“Where there’s transparency, there’s trust. It’s really that simple,” says Dr. Fynn. “Oftentimes, [in] what used to be the scientific method, the process gets reversed. They look at the conclusion that is agreeable or preferred, and then they start working backwards. How can we prove this conclusion?”
Views expressed in this video are opinions of the host and the guest, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
25,295 Listeners
1,998 Listeners
2,093 Listeners
2,566 Listeners
229 Listeners
1,464 Listeners
1,810 Listeners
557 Listeners
16,897 Listeners
6,378 Listeners
2,491 Listeners
541 Listeners
8,734 Listeners
600 Listeners
1,230 Listeners
14 Listeners
134 Listeners
67 Listeners
5 Listeners
4 Listeners
9 Listeners