
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Dr. Lynn Fynn is a clinical research scientist and a retired infectious disease specialist. We sat down together to discuss issues she sees plaguing medical research, including the misallocation of funds, a broken peer review process, and major conflicts of interest.
”Any time you incentivize something, you’re creating a bias. And when you create a bias, there’s an element of truth that’s removed from the equation,” says Dr. Fynn.
“When a pharmaceutical company gets to pour money into a program, the curriculum is going to reflect what they want it to reflect, to make it a profitable transaction for them. It’s a return on investment.”
What practical steps are needed to restore public trust in science and medicine?
“Where there’s transparency, there’s trust. It’s really that simple,” says Dr. Fynn. “Oftentimes, [in] what used to be the scientific method, the process gets reversed. They look at the conclusion that is agreeable or preferred, and then they start working backwards. How can we prove this conclusion?”
Views expressed in this video are opinions of the host and the guest, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
4.9
11501,150 ratings
Dr. Lynn Fynn is a clinical research scientist and a retired infectious disease specialist. We sat down together to discuss issues she sees plaguing medical research, including the misallocation of funds, a broken peer review process, and major conflicts of interest.
”Any time you incentivize something, you’re creating a bias. And when you create a bias, there’s an element of truth that’s removed from the equation,” says Dr. Fynn.
“When a pharmaceutical company gets to pour money into a program, the curriculum is going to reflect what they want it to reflect, to make it a profitable transaction for them. It’s a return on investment.”
What practical steps are needed to restore public trust in science and medicine?
“Where there’s transparency, there’s trust. It’s really that simple,” says Dr. Fynn. “Oftentimes, [in] what used to be the scientific method, the process gets reversed. They look at the conclusion that is agreeable or preferred, and then they start working backwards. How can we prove this conclusion?”
Views expressed in this video are opinions of the host and the guest, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
2,087 Listeners
660 Listeners
232 Listeners
1,467 Listeners
1,821 Listeners
570 Listeners
6,593 Listeners
2,492 Listeners
9,106 Listeners
6,001 Listeners
287 Listeners
1,253 Listeners
142 Listeners
398 Listeners
239 Listeners
72 Listeners
17 Listeners
28 Listeners
17 Listeners
102 Listeners