
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


A substantial collection of evidence indicates that the fallopian tube serves as the primary site of origin for a large portion of high-grade serous ovarian cancers. As a result, clinical practice guidelines (including from the ACOG) recommend salpingectomy for permanent contraception- when necessary- rather than simple tubal ligation. But an August 2023 publication, in JAMA Network Open, stated that women who undergo a salpingectomy are no more or less at risk of ovarian cancer compared to traditional tubal ligation. Why? In this episode, we will summarize this controversial publication and contrast that to a systematic review the following month, in September 2023 in JAMA Surgery, which provides an alternative conclusion. Should we still perform opportunistic salpingectomies (OS) rather than tubal ligations in the average-risk patient? We’ll explain the data and provide clinical pearls for practice at the end of the episode. Thank you, Bret, for this clinical conundrum as a podcast episode recommendation! You ask…we do!
By Dr. Chapa’s Clinical Pearls4.1
447447 ratings
A substantial collection of evidence indicates that the fallopian tube serves as the primary site of origin for a large portion of high-grade serous ovarian cancers. As a result, clinical practice guidelines (including from the ACOG) recommend salpingectomy for permanent contraception- when necessary- rather than simple tubal ligation. But an August 2023 publication, in JAMA Network Open, stated that women who undergo a salpingectomy are no more or less at risk of ovarian cancer compared to traditional tubal ligation. Why? In this episode, we will summarize this controversial publication and contrast that to a systematic review the following month, in September 2023 in JAMA Surgery, which provides an alternative conclusion. Should we still perform opportunistic salpingectomies (OS) rather than tubal ligations in the average-risk patient? We’ll explain the data and provide clinical pearls for practice at the end of the episode. Thank you, Bret, for this clinical conundrum as a podcast episode recommendation! You ask…we do!

64 Listeners

2,462 Listeners

3,382 Listeners

1,040 Listeners

234 Listeners

560 Listeners

1,108 Listeners

1,139 Listeners

285 Listeners

228 Listeners

1,619 Listeners

379 Listeners

91 Listeners

22 Listeners

1,195 Listeners