Chris Hagenow and John Hendrickson mark a somber Friday in the Hendrickson Library — the 25th anniversary of September 11th and the one-year anniversary of the passing of Charlie Kirk. Both get a moment of reflection before the episode moves on to the business at hand.

The main event is Amendment One. The opposition campaign has officially launched, led by Common Good Iowa and a coalition of progressive interest groups and public and private labor unions. Chris walks through their arguments — service cuts, school funding, emergency response — and finds the same thread running through all of them: a baseline desire to make it easier to raise taxes. John frames it cleanly: these are the tax eaters, and their language of "fully fund" and "invest" is code for more government spending. Chris closes with the complete ITR campaign playbook — no hidden agenda, no complicated counter-arguments. Just a simple message: this amendment makes it harder to raise your taxes, and most Iowans agree that's a good thing.

ITR is traveling the state and wants to come to your meeting. If you have a group, reach out.

0:06 Welcome

1:53 9/11 at 25

5:48 Charlie Kirk anniversary

8:20 Housekeeping & vote yes reminder

9:03 ITR on the road — come find us

10:20 Trivia: H.R. Gross answer & new Civil War question

13:08 The opposition campaign launches

14:32 Breaking down their arguments

18:04 The tax eaters — what they really want

20:49 ITR's campaign playbook

25:17 Sign off

With Labor Day marking the official start of the campaign sprint, Chris and John survey the advertising landscape taking shape across Iowa's major races. What are prevailing themes in these campaigns, and what issues should candidates address?The policy conversation centers on affordability and what's actually driving voter concern heading into November. John references a Washington Times piece on the economy as the dominant issue of the cycle, and Chris draws the through line from federal deficit spending to consumer prices to Iowa's case for fiscal restraint — and for Amendment One. John and Chris also plug a co-authored piece with Tom Sands making the business climate case for the amendment, using Washington state's income tax spiral as the cautionary example.

Chris Hagenow and John Hendrickson are back together in studio after John has been out on what Chris generously describes as a paleo-conservative world tour.

The conversation opens with a survey of the Iowa governor's race, including a new Suffolk University poll showing Rob Sand with a modest lead over Zach Lahn and Ashley Hinson ahead of Josh Turek in the Senate race. Chris and John assess where the race stands with Labor Day approaching, what issues are actually moving voters — and whether the water quality and cancer conversation dominating the campaign trail reflects what Iowans are thinking about at the dinner table.

John brings back a dispatch from the State Policy Network's annual conference, where Iowa's decade of conservative reform was a consistent topic of conversation. Colleagues from around the country — including states playing nothing but defense — noted that Iowa is doing something rare: leaders who said they'd cut taxes and did, who said they'd do school choice and did. Governor Reynolds drew particular praise.

Chris closes with a recap of his Iowa Public Radio River to River debate on Amendment One against a League of Women Voters representative. The opposition's arguments — service cuts, police and fire defunding, budget paralysis — got a thorough airing and a thorough rebuttal. The episode ends with the national debt crossing $40 trillion and a reminder of why Iowa's fiscal foundation is worth protecting.

0:09 Welcome back & John's return

2:36 Trivia

4:51 Suffolk poll: governor's and Senate races

9:03 Water quality vs. kitchen table economics

10:14 Sand's economic program

11:44 Lahn elevating tax policy

12:59 Is it always the economy, stupid?

14:09 What real Iowans are talking about

15:46 The ongoing case for tax relief

17:57 John's national dispatch

19:40 Iowa's reputation among conservative peers

20:54 Reynolds and the vision beyond reelection

24:23 River to River: the Amendment One debate

26:02 Rebutting the opposition's arguments

28:30 Washington state: the cautionary tale

29:59 The forces that always want more

32:13 National debt hits $40 trillion

34:26 Iowa's fiscal foundation

35:09 Sign off

Chris Hagenow and John Hendrickson are back in the Hendrickson Library for a wide-ranging episode — and opposition to the constitutional amendment is starting to emerge, which means it's time to sharpen the arguments.

Chris leads with the amendment, because voices on the left are now claiming that protecting income taxes from a simple majority vote will somehow cause other taxes to go up. Chris and John take that argument apart piece by piece, drawing on Iowa's own recent history to show why the premise doesn't hold. The real lesson: every time someone argues Iowa will inevitably need to raise more revenue, they're making the case for why this protection needs to be in the Constitution.

From there, the conversation turns to local government and the ongoing fallout from the property tax reform law. The city of Dubuque's complaint about a $200 million drop in taxable value gets a close reading. Bond elections are on the horizon in Johnson County and Urbandale, both for law enforcement facilities.

The episode closes with a look at the Sand-Muhlbauer ticket's "local control" messaging tour and what it actually means: they want local governments to be able to keep raising property taxes.

0:00 Welcome & headset chaos1:57 Trivia4:34 Amendment one: opposition is emerging6:00 The "other taxes will go up" argument9:48 Distrust of government13:41 Dubuque and the property tax bill backlash15:10 The inflation argument18:57 Bond elections24:28 Sand-Muhlbauer "local control" tour29:43 John's immigration debate with Vance Ginn30:58 John's Herbert Hoover Library visit & sign off

Chris Hagenow welcomes ITR Foundation Research Director Sarah Curry back to the studio. The occasion: a debrief on ITR Foundation's second annual Local Government Symposium, and it sounds like it was the best one yet.

Sarah and Chris walk through what the symposium is and why it exists — local elected officials don't have the same depth of resources available to state legislators, and too often the information they do receive comes filtered through national associations with agendas that don't match Iowa. ITR Foundation is trying to fill that gap with practical, Iowa-focused content for the city council members, county supervisors, and school board members who are running local government on a part-time basis while holding down jobs and raising families.

The conversation covers the day's major themes: what the proper function of a city actually is (police, fire, roads — not homeless task forces or economic development grants), why the free market allocates resources better than government, and what local officials should take from the property tax reform law that is now on the books — namely, that relitigating it is a waste of time and energy. The symposium also featured sessions on communicating with constituents, local endorsements, open meetings law, and a school board track that introduced benchmarking — why comparing Waterloo to Sioux City makes more sense than comparing Waterloo to Waukee.

Before and after the symposium discussion, Chris makes sure listeners know about the amendment one campaign. Vote yes. MakeTaxHikesHarder.com.

0:12 Welcome & Sarah Curry returns

1:14 Amendment one reminder — and Sarah goes on record

2:13 What is the Local Government Symposium?

3:33 Why local officials need a different kind of resource

9:13 Free market vs. government in service delivery

10:04 UBI and scope creep: what cities shouldn't be doing

12:31 Property tax reform: stop relitigating, start implementing

13:38 Communications and constituent outreach

16:00 Local endorsements — more powerful than you think

19:27 Open meetings law and legal guardrails

22:15 School board breakout: benchmarking districts correctly

25:06 Chris's legislative update: property tax law is settled

30:08 What's next for ITR Foundation's local government work

30:45 Sign off & vote yes

Chris Hagenow and John Hendrickson are back in the Hendrickson Library — John rolls in with a red solo cup of cream soda, and the energy is right. This one's worth tuning in for.

The big news: ITR officially launched its campaign yesterday. The website is live at MakeTaxHikesHarder.com. The mission is straightforward — make sure Iowans know the constitutional amendment is on the ballot this fall, and know to vote yes. Chris walks through what the amendment does and why it matters.

From there, New Jersey's admission that over 6,000 noncitizens were added to its voter rolls — and 400 of them voted — gives Chris and John an opportunity to revisit the election integrity debate. Governor Reynolds was asked about it at the same press conference where she signaled support for the amendment, and her answer hits the right notes.

The episode closes with two Chicago Tribune editorials on tax policy that John flagged — both making the case that Illinois is falling behind its neighbors on property tax and income tax reform, and that spending is the root of the problem. When the Tribune editorial board starts sounding like ITR, something might actually be changing.

0:13 Red solo cup

2:31 Campaign launch: MakeTaxHikesHarder.com

3:08 What the amendment does

5:59 16 states already have this — including blue ones

7:48 Washington state: what happens without it

9:39 History: this was on the ballot in 1999

10:14 What the amendment doesn't do

11:35 Public support

12:16 Two things Iowans need to know before November

14:41 Iowa's decade of income tax progress

15:08 New Jersey: 6,000 noncitizens on the voter rolls

17:11 The case for voter roll integrity

18:05 Chris's University of Iowa panel story

20:07 Chicago Tribune on property taxes and Illinois

22:13 Tribune on income taxes: Iowa as the model

26:03 Sign off & vote yes

Chris Hagenow and John Hendrickson are back in the Hendrickson Library — Dr. Pepper Zero firmly in hand — for a wide-ranging episode covering American patriotism, election integrity, faith in politics, and Iowa voter registration trends.

The episode opens with a reflection on America's 250th birthday. Chris wanted more. The fireworks, the parades, the national moment — it didn't feel commensurate with what 250 years of the greatest experiment in self-government deserves. John connects the muted celebration to decades of failure to teach American history, and the two discuss why the left's framework for America — defined by grievance rather than gratitude — is increasingly out of step with how the rest of the world sees this country.

From there, a Des Moines Register story catches their attention: a coalition of faith leaders warning that voting integrity laws are "the moral issue of our time." Chris and John take that claim seriously — and find it wanting. The conversation gets at something deeper than any specific piece of legislation: when social justice becomes the gospel, what happens to the actual gospel?

The back half covers Iowa's new voter registration numbers — Democrats and Republicans both added voters coming out of the primaries, while independents declined — and what that tells us about Rob Sand's argument for a jungle primary. Spoiler: it doesn't hold up. The episode closes with a clear distinction between what conservatives mean when they talk about election law versus what the left is actually proposing, and a reminder to flip your ballot over this fall and vote yes on the constitutional amendment.

0:10 Welcome

1:09 Trivia

3:16 Smithsonian: correcting the American history narrative

5:23 Fourth of July rhetoric from the left

9:10 America at 250

16:48 Faith leaders and voting rights

18:35 The Save Act and voter ID

22:21 When social justice becomes the gospel

26:53 Iowa voter registration numbers

28:39 Sand's jungle primary argument falls apart

30:45 Election law reform vs. what the left actually wants

34:07 Reform vs. revolution

35:06 Candidates on taxes — next episode

35:32 Vote yes & sign off

Chris Hagenow and John Hendrickson are back in the Hendrickson Library for a special episode: the first public look at the ITR Foundation's June 2026 general election poll. These are, as far as Chris knows, the first published numbers of the cycle on Iowa's major statewide races — and the results are worth paying attention to.

The poll covers the generic ballot, issue priorities, candidate matchups in all three major statewide races, and — most importantly for ITR — the constitutional amendment to require a two-thirds legislative supermajority to raise income taxes. Chris and John walk through what the numbers say, what they mean, and what they don't.

The headline from the amendment question: 74% of Iowans support it — higher than in any previous poll — including 72% of independents and 60% of Democrats. Chris makes the case that whatever the margin of error, whatever the exact sample, the underlying message is unambiguous: Iowans want protection from future tax increases, and they want it written into the constitution.

Tune in for the full breakdown of the governor's race numbers (closer than most Republicans assume), the Senate and AG matchups, and what the issue priority data says about the environment heading into November.0:14 Welcome & housekeeping1:46 Trivia: Coolidge answer & new Civil War question3:25 Iowa Dept. of Revenue income tax report4:55 About the ITR Foundation poll & Cygnal methodology9:17 Right track / wrong track & generic ballot10:55 Top voter issues: economy, taxes, immigration14:35 US Senate: Hinson vs. Turek15:27 Governor: Lahn vs. Sand15:47 Attorney General: Bird vs. Williams17:00 Sand's name ID advantage — and its limits20:38 The constitutional amendment explained22:13 74% support — breaking down the numbers24:00 Why the amendment resonates across party lines28:25 ESA / school choice numbers31:45 What it all means heading into November34:31 Sign off

Chris Hagenow and John Hendrickson are back in the Hendrickson Library for a week-in-review episode — Chris flying without his Dr. Pepper Zero. Trivia wraps last week's Smoot-Hawley question and a new one goes out just in time for Independence Day: what president was born on July 4th?

The episode opens on the Ian Roberts saga — the KCCI interview, the body cam arrest footage, and the stubborn contingent of Iowa liberals still defending him. From there, a quick take on the Iran ceasefire deal: $300 billion, sanctions relief, and a memorandum of understanding that raises more questions than it answers. Senator Joni Ernst wants to know where the money is coming from, and Chris and John share the concern.

The back half turns to Iowa. Rob Sand's residency hit on Zach Lahn gets dissected — Chris sees it as an act of desperation that wastes the political capital Sand needs to actually define his candidacy. Sand's self-described "audit" of the Iowa Students First (ESA) program draws an equally pointed response: it's a partisan press conference, not an audit, and private school families across Iowa are paying attention.

John closes with a piece he authored on the Electoral College and its importance to rural states — prompted by Virginia's governor signing on to the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. The episode ends with a preview of what will become a regular theme between now and November: vote yes on the constitutional amendment to make it harder to raise taxes in Iowa.

0:12 Welcome & housekeeping

1:44 Trivia: Smoot-Hawley answer & July 4th question

4:36 Ian Roberts KCCI interview and arrest footage

7:11 Liberals still defending Roberts

9:17 Iran ceasefire deal

12:46 DOGE: what happened to the savings?

14:16 Sand's residency hit on Lahn

18:10 Sand's ESA "audit"

23:35 ESA, private schools, and taxpayer dollars

25:31 ITR poll coming soon

26:05 John's Electoral College article

27:26 Virginia joins National Popular Vote Compact

30:35 Jungle primaries and left-wing election changes

33:28 Constitutional amendment — vote yes this fall

Chris Hagenow and John Hendrickson are back in the Hendrickson Library with a packed episode covering Iowa's fast-moving post-primary political landscape. Both gubernatorial candidates have now selected their running mates: Rob Sand tapped Dave Muhlbauer, a farmer from western Iowa, while Zach Lahn chose State Representative Derek Wulf of Black Hawk County, also a farmer. Chris and John break down the strategy behind each pick, why Wulf stands out as a particularly strong choice for Lahn, and what the selection of two agricultural running mates signals about where both campaigns think the race will be won.

The conversation turns to the broader general election dynamics shaping up between Lahn and Sand. Chris and John assess how quickly the Republican Party has consolidated around Lahn, the head start Sand's campaign has built toward a general election operation, and how the scrutiny of a real general election contest may complicate Sand's carefully constructed moderate image. A Republican Party audio drop this week — featuring Sand openly calling for political retribution on judicial nominations — gives the Lahn campaign exactly the kind of contrast material it needs to make the "governor for all Iowans" sell a harder one for Sand.

The second half of the episode takes up two policy-driven stories. First, the final report on Iowa's Universal Basic Income pilot — a project run through several central Iowa cities that distributed $500 monthly stipends to participants. The report's conclusions, citing reduced stress and improved "sense of mattering," prompt a pointed exchange about what government is actually for, who's paying, and why local governments have no business engineering social outcomes with taxpayer dollars. Chris and John connect this directly to Iowa's property tax problem and the fiscal absurdity of local governments playing philanthropist.

Finally, a Des Moines Register story on the city of Des Moines reconsidering its tax incentive programs — including TIF and property tax abatements — gives Chris and John a chance to explore when these tools have merit and when they're simply political ribbon-cutting at taxpayer expense.

0:13 Welcome & housekeeping

2:24 Trivia: Laddie Boy & Smoot-Hawley

5:01 Correction & running mate announcements

5:52 Sand picks Muhlbauer, Lahn picks Derek Wulf

8:22 Why Wulf is a strong pick for Lahn

10:32 GOP consolidation & Lahn's general election ramp-up

12:22 Sand's media advantage and the contrast campaign ahead

13:37 Sand audio drop & turning him into a generic Democrat

14:34 Andy Beshear visits Iowa — 2028 implications

15:32 Iowa's UBI pilot: background and ITR's role

18:15 Dissecting the report — who pays for "feeling mattered"?

21:22 UBI, local government overreach, and property taxes

25:59 Des Moines reconsiders TIF and tax incentives

28:05 When incentives work — and when they're ribbon-cutting

30:33 Free market vs. government-directed development

33:28 Sign off