
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Those who claim that the Bible is “inerrant” are clear that this applies to the “autographs,” or original manuscripts, of the Bible. But we don’t have ANY of those original manuscripts. What does that mean for claims that the Bible is “inerrant”? And even if we did have those originals, most of us can’t read the Bible its original languages. Can a translated Bible still be inerrant? In this episode Dan shows why the lack of manuscripts is a HUGE problem for claims to inerrancy, and argues that it’s impossible for a Bible translation to be inerrant. Dive into the episode to find out why.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
By Bradley Onishi + Daniel Miller4.7
18951,895 ratings
Those who claim that the Bible is “inerrant” are clear that this applies to the “autographs,” or original manuscripts, of the Bible. But we don’t have ANY of those original manuscripts. What does that mean for claims that the Bible is “inerrant”? And even if we did have those originals, most of us can’t read the Bible its original languages. Can a translated Bible still be inerrant? In this episode Dan shows why the lack of manuscripts is a HUGE problem for claims to inerrancy, and argues that it’s impossible for a Bible translation to be inerrant. Dive into the episode to find out why.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

9,238 Listeners

3,530 Listeners

87,868 Listeners

12,741 Listeners

2,082 Listeners

5,832 Listeners

8,371 Listeners

51,054 Listeners

2,080 Listeners

1,572 Listeners

16,525 Listeners

9,295 Listeners

98 Listeners

11,013 Listeners

2 Listeners

2,307 Listeners

3,186 Listeners

25 Listeners

16 Listeners

88 Listeners

21 Listeners

207 Listeners

156 Listeners