Todd Blanche’s CNN interview about his sit-down with Ghislaine Maxwell has been met with skepticism for good reason. Blanche framed his conversation with her as an exercise in transparency, but his insistence that it was “impossible” to determine if she was credible rang hollow, especially given the mountain of contradictions and lies Maxwell has already told under oath. Instead of pressing her on the details of Epstein’s network, Blanche largely leaned into a narrative that it was up to the “public” to decide, effectively punting the DOJ’s responsibility to establish facts. For someone in his position, such hedging looks less like neutrality and more like avoidance.

What makes it worse is Blanche’s background and the circumstances. As a former Trump lawyer, his presence raises red flags about conflicts of interest, and the softball nature of his questions only fuels suspicion that this interview was more about optics than accountability. Maxwell’s transfer to a cushier, low-security facility right after this sit-down only adds to the perception that she is still receiving special treatment in exchange for selective cooperation. The entire spectacle looks less like a hard-nosed inquiry into one of the biggest sex-trafficking conspiracies of the modern era, and more like a carefully stage-managed charade designed to protect the powerful.


to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

Blanche breaks silence on meeting with Ghislaine Maxwell: 'Impossible' to say if she was credible - ABC News

In Britain, a state visit by Donald Trump was jolted when activists projected massive images of Trump and Jeffrey Epstein onto the walls of Windsor Castle. The stunt, which British police quickly shut down, resulted in four arrests on charges of “malicious communications.” Photos of the projection spread globally within minutes, hijacking the carefully staged optics of a royal ceremony and forcing Epstein’s name back into headlines through spectacle and shock.

Across the Atlantic, a federal judge in Manhattan ruled against unsealing the identities of two women once described as potential co-conspirators in Epstein’s network. Prosecutors never charged the women, and the court argued disclosure would expose them to unnecessary harm. The decision reignited frustration among survivors and transparency advocates, who see secrecy as another barrier to accountability, ensuring that questions about who enabled Epstein remain unanswered.


to contact me:

[email protected]

Ghislaine Maxwell’s proffer session with the DOJ was less about truth and accountability and more about performance and deceit. The entire premise of a proffer is simple: you trade truth for a chance at leniency. But Maxwell didn’t come to the table with intelligence, evidence, or leads that could help dismantle Epstein’s far-reaching web. She came armed with a rehearsed script of lies and character assassinations. She weaponized her time in that room not to aid justice, but to smear survivors who had already borne the crushing weight of humiliation in courtrooms and the press. The newly released emails now strip away any doubt about what happened—they show that Maxwell didn’t stumble or misremember. She perjured herself over and over, carefully contradicting her own sworn statements. This was deliberate, malicious dishonesty. And yet, instead of being dragged back to court with perjury charges and buried under the consequences, she was inexplicably rewarded with cushier accommodations. Sitting across from her during this travesty was none other than Deputy Director Todd “Baby Billy” Blanche, a man who should have cut the session short the moment the lies started, but who instead sat back, nodded, and let justice be mocked.

The fallout from this disaster stretches far beyond Maxwell herself. For survivors, it was another betrayal layered on top of years of indifference and ridicule. They were once again slandered, this time under the very nose of the government agency tasked with protecting them. Their truth, earned through blood and tears, was tossed aside so Maxwell could preserve her own skin. For the public, the message couldn’t be clearer: the Department of Justice is not an impartial arbiter of the law, but a stage where the rich and connected get to rewrite the script in their favor. Accountability was promised, but what America got instead was a rigged performance where lies were treated as cooperation, and perjury was treated as a perk. A real justice department would have treated her dishonesty as a direct assault on the rule of law, stacking charges on her until her arrogance collapsed. But instead, Blanche and his colleagues chose complicity over courage, shielding Maxwell from consequences and exposing to everyone watching that in America, justice isn’t blind—it looks the other way when power is in the room.



to contact me:

[email protected]

Jeffrey Epstein cultivated a long relationship with Harvard University by donating nearly $9 million between 1998 and 2007, including $6.5 million to establish the Program for Evolutionary Dynamics. Despite lacking the qualifications typical of the role, he was even made a visiting fellow in the psychology department in 2005. His gifts and connections bought him influence and proximity to prominent faculty, while also boosting Harvard’s fundraising ties to other wealthy donors he introduced.

Even after his 2008 conviction, Epstein continued to access Harvard’s campus, particularly the Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, where he visited dozens of times and had his own office space. Harvard later acknowledged that its oversight and policies were too weak to prevent his continued presence and influence. The university eventually stopped accepting his money but only after years of enjoying the benefits of his donations and connections.


to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

Alan Dershowitz made an appearance on News Nation this week where he attempted to defend the associates of Jeffrey Epstein who were about to be unmasked using the same old excuse that...nobody knew. Nobody had a CLUE who or what Jeffrey Epstein was.


In this episode we take a look at what Dershowitz had to say in the interview about Jeffrey Epstein and the newly unsealed names and what we might expect as things continue to move forward.




to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

Alan Dershowitz: Don't Blame Men on Jeffrey Epstein’s List (mediaite.com)

In 2021, Capital One agreed to pay a staggering $390 million penalty after U.S. regulators determined the bank had willfully failed to comply with anti–money laundering requirements. The investigation revealed that Capital One allowed millions of suspicious transactions to flow through its check-cashing operations between 2008 and 2014 without filing the necessary suspicious activity reports. These lapses enabled potential money laundering and other illicit financial activities to slip past the very safeguards designed to prevent them. The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) described the bank’s conduct as a serious breakdown in oversight, especially troubling for a major institution trusted with safeguarding the financial system.

To contact me:

[email protected]


source:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/capital-one-settles-with-fincen-over-anti-money-laundering-deficiencies-11610750699

Caroline Kaufman, now 27, filed a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein’s estate seeking $500 million in damages, claiming that an incident when she was 17 years old at Epstein’s Manhattan mansion resulted in the development of a serious bone disease (osteomyelitis). She alleges that during a fake modeling casting arranged by Epstein, she was raped, and in the course of the assault Epstein struck her in the face and pinned her arm, which she says led to a jaw injury that triggered the disease. After the assault, Kaufman says she suffered severe pain, muscle spasms, and emotional trauma; the physical injury is central to her claim.

Kaufman first considered taking compensation through the Epstein victim’s compensation fund but rejected the offer she received as “offensive,” saying it wouldn’t even cover the surgery she believes she needs. She alleges the fund did not distribute its money in a way that was fair or sufficient to victims. Citing Epstein’s estimated worth (over $600 million), her legal team argues that the compensation sought is within reason given the severity of the harm alleged.


To contact me:


[email protected]






Source:



https://nypost.com/2021/06/15/jeffrey-epstein-accuser-sues-for-500m-over-bone-disease/

Emails between Jes Staley and Jeffrey Epstein, spanning from 2008 to 2015, reveal a far closer and more personal relationship than Staley publicly admitted. The two men exchanged more than a thousand messages, often using affectionate or cryptic language that suggested intimacy and familiarity beyond professional dealings. In one notable exchange, Staley referenced “Snow White” and was asked by Epstein which “character” he wanted next, to which Staley replied “Beauty and the Beast” — language that regulators later flagged as highly concerning given Epstein’s crimes. Other emails show Staley leaning on Epstein for advice about his career moves, pay negotiations, and even matters concerning his daughter, portraying Epstein not just as a business contact but as a trusted confidant.


Regulators found that Staley and Barclays misled the public by downplaying the depth of this relationship. Staley had claimed his contact with Epstein ended before joining Barclays in 2015, but the emails clearly showed otherwise. The UK Financial Conduct Authority concluded that Staley’s statements lacked integrity and were reckless, resulting in fines and a ban from holding senior roles in financial services. Ultimately, the email trove undercut Staley’s defense and demonstrated that he maintained a deeply entangled and personal bond with Epstein even after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, raising questions about judgment, accountability, and the true nature of their association.


to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

https://nypost.com/2021/11/12/former-barclays-ceo-reportedly-exchanged-1200-emails-with-jeffrey-epstein/

On Hannity, Ron DeSantis spotlighted his newly signed Florida law authorizing the release of grand jury transcripts from the 2006 Jeffrey Epstein investigation. He argued that the public has a right to see who was implicated and to understand how a wealthy, politically connected sex trafficker managed to secure such a lenient deal. DeSantis stressed that the punishment Epstein received in Florida was “wholly inadequate” for the crimes, framing the move as a correction to past failures of accountability.

He also emphasized that Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were not the only ones involved, saying that others who played roles in the trafficking network should be exposed and held responsible. DeSantis framed the bill as a way to pierce secrecy and prevent elite protection from shielding wrongdoers, underscoring that no amount of wealth or influence should insulate people from justice.


to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

DeSantis Details Legislation Behind Releasing Epstein Docs, Says Ghislaine Maxwell Can’t Be The Only One Responsible | The Daily Caller

Leon Black, billionaire co-founder of Apollo Global Management, maintained a direct and lucrative financial relationship with Jeffrey Epstein long after Epstein’s 2008 conviction. Records show Black paid Epstein roughly $158 million between 2012 and 2017 for what he characterized as tax, estate, and philanthropic advisory work. Despite Epstein’s notoriety, Black said he relied on top law firms and accounting advisors to vet Epstein’s services, insisting the payments were tied to legitimate advice.

Beyond financial dealings, Black’s inclusion in Epstein’s 2003 “birthday book” underscored a social tie as well. He submitted a poem that alluded to Epstein’s reputation for financial wizardry, suggesting familiarity beyond just business. Congressional investigators and Senate leaders have since questioned whether the scale of the payments was commensurate with the services Epstein claimed to provide, calling for deeper IRS scrutiny into whether Epstein was effectively a shadow fixer for Black’s wealth.


to  contact  me:

[email protected]


Source:

https://www.crainsnewyork.com/finance/epstein-had-door-apollo-his-deep-ties-black