Judge Mathis Podcast

First, The plaintiff brings his brother to court and says they lived together for a short period of time. The plaintiff says his brother assaulted him in the apartment and refused to pay rent, so he’s suing. The defendant refuses to pay because he says the plaintiff kicked him out.

Then, The plaintiff, a former crack addict, says she knows the defendant through her mother. She’s suing because she claims the defendant totaled her car while she was in jail. The defendant says the plaintiff hustled the defendant’s mom to get money for her drug addiction. She alleges the accident was a hit-and-run that wasn’t her fault.

Plus, In this Throwback, the plaintiff says the defendant has children with her nephew. She’s suing because she alleges the defendant smashed a cell phone she had bought for the defendant’s son. The defendant says the plaintiff meddles, and she had forbidden her from buying a cell phone for her child. Find out where they are now in a Fast Forward.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. 

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, The plaintiff opened an in-home day care center during the pandemic. She says the defendant enrolled her two kids in the day care, then withdrew them both without notice. She’s suing for breach of contract. The defendant says her oldest child’s father died and she was grieving. She denies owing the plaintiff anything because she says the plaintiff’s day care center had code violations and she always sent her daughter home early.

Plus, The plaintiff says after he lost his wife and kids in a house fire, he became addicted to meth. He says he got clean a year ago after he and his fiancée lost custody of their kids. He’s suing the defendant for a refund on a car. The defendant says he was a meth user too after he was mocked because of a birth defect. He’s clean now, and he’s countersuing for emotional distress.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. 

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, The plaintiff met the defendant through a Facebook group for moms. The plaintiff says she booked a trip to Orlando with the defendant, but then learned the resort they were staying at was an hour outside Orlando. She cancelled her spot, and she’s suing for the cost of the trip. The defendant argues the hotel wasn’t an hour away — only about 35 to 40 minutes. She says the plaintiff started harassing her, so she’s countersuing.

Then, The plaintiff says she dated the defendant for a few weeks when they were drug addicts. Years later they became roommates, but she was forced to leave and live in her car when he began harassing her, so she’s suing. The defendant admits they were friends with benefits at one point. He says he told her to leave because she refused to pay any rent.

Plus, The plaintiff says the defendant is her younger brother, who’s a real mama’s boy. She says she loaned him $4,000 without telling her husband, straining her marriage when he didn’t repay her, so she’s suing. The defendant admits he’s a mama’s boy, but he claims he’s being sued for more than he owes.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. 

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, The plaintiff gets the final result of the DNA test to see if the defendant is his father.

Then, The plaintiff says she dated the defendant and he moved to L.A. to live with her, but they broke up because he couldn’t keep up with his financial obligations. She’s suing him for unpaid loans and mileage fees. The defendant says the plaintiff made sex videos and sold them, and he claims she’s suing him for more than he owes.

Plus, The plaintiff says he met the defendant through her ex and they became friends, but things got rocky. He’s suing his former friend for breach of contract and emotional distress. The defendant says the plaintiff is a mooch and a cocaine addict. She’s countersuing because she alleges he slashed her tires.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. 

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, The plaintiffs are a mother and son. The son Christopher previously came on “Judge Mathis” for a DNA test regarding a sibling, but this time he’s back to see if the defendant is his father. The defendant says he had an intimate relationship with the female plaintiff, but says he knew nothing about Christopher until recently.

Then, The plaintiff was married to the defendant’s friend, and he was best man at their wedding. After they divorced, she began dating the defendant. She accuses him of slashing her tire and burned her book collection, so he’s suing. The defendant says he only flattened her tire to prevent her from driving on bald tires.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. 

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, The plaintiff met the defendant on a dating website, and they began a relationship. The plaintiff says the defendant asked her for money to help pay for a trip he needed to take, but he has not paid her back. She also says she loaned him money to help pay for a down payment on a house. She’s suing for the cost of a flight, hotel room, and unpaid loans. He’s countersuing for the down payment on a car and car repairs.

Then, The plaintiff says the defendant was engaged to her son, and she loved her like a daughter. Still, she’s suing her for unpaid loans and postage fees. The defendant says the plaintiff’s son was physically abusive and tried to strangle her, and then the plaintiff bailed him out of jail. She’s countersuing for emotional distress.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. 

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, The plaintiff met the defendant when they worked as showgirls in Las Vegas. They decided to start a business together, but she claims the defendant backed out of the business. The plaintiff alleges the defendant stole costumes and other inventory from their business, so she’s suing for stolen property. The defendant denies abandoning the business. She’s countersuing for unreturned property and harassment.

Then, The plaintiff dated the defendant while he was separated from his wife, and they were on and off. She’s suing him for an unpaid loan. The defendant says they were on and off because she cheated on him constantly, including with a friend of his 19-year-old son, so he refuses to pay anything.

Plus, The plaintiff says she was close with the defendant and they partied together. She’s suing because she claims the defendant’s daughter damaged her TV. The defendant says the plaintiff is bougie and looks down on her. She insists her daughter isn’t the only one responsible for the broken TV, so she shouldn’t have to pay.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. 

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, The plaintiff takes her mother to court. She says her mother did not raise her at all because she was in a gang and had her when she was 13. The plaintiff claims her mother broke into her house and robbed her, so she’s suing for damaged and stolen and property. The defendant admits she was not a present mother but says she is trying to repair her relationships with her children. She’s countersuing for emotional distress.

Then, The plaintiff says she dated the defendant until she discovered he was cheating. She claims that after they broke up, she caught him on video keying her car, so she’s suing him. The defendant says his ex snooped and falsely accused him of cheating. He says she is the cheater and blames her for bringing out “the devil” in him.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. 

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, The plaintiff dated the defendant and said he went to jail for a year and a half during their relationship. She argues the defendant borrowed her car when she was asleep and totaled the vehicle after making an illegal U-turn and driving drunk. She’s suing for a collections notice. The defendant admits he fled the scene of the accident and drove while intoxicated.

Then, In this Throwback, the plaintiff is suing his younger brother because he claimed he damaged his apartment. The defendant says his brother is arrogant, and he denies owing him for anything. Now they’re back in the courtroom again! This time, the roles are reversed: The plaintiff is suing his older brother for an unpaid loan, and the defendant denies owing a thing.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. 

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

First, Debbie and Donna get the results of their DNA test and learn if they are sisters.

Plus, The plaintiff says he was engaged to the defendant, but she left him for her current boyfriend. He’s suing his ex for unreturned property and an engagement ring. The defendant says her ex is a raging alcoholic who emotionally abused her. She’s countersuing for emotional distress.

Then, The plaintiff says the defendant is his uncle and they did a podcast together, but it fell apart when his uncle fooled around with the plaintiff’s ex. He’s suing for breach of contract. The defendant admits he hooked up with his ex, but he claims he did his nephew a favor.

Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. 

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices