Kathy's InDieZoNe

Here we provide pure opinions, commentary and speculation concerning the current status of the high-profile, highly-sealed, long closed criminal cases of Idaho v. Kohberger and note that all documents released onto the court docket thus far in 2026 have to do with sealing information from the public while 89 documents ordered to be unsealed by Judge Steven J. Hippler on December 18, 2025 have not yet been - over three months later.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

#Idaho4

#BryanKohberger

#IdahovKohberger

#FreeSpeech

#FirstAmendment

Here we provide an update in the form of pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the current status of the civil defamation case styled as Macron v. Owens, where the President and First Lady of France have sued podcaster Candace Owens alleging the defendant defamed Ms. Macron by claiming she was born a man, "switched" identities with a male, and has engaged in other acts of defamation against her.

In providing pure opinions, commentary and speculation per the First Amendment which is cited to and quoted, we also note the Defendants have filed a Motion to Dismiss the Lawsuit which is now reflected on the court docket to be entertained at hearing on April 28, 2026.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

#CandaceOwens

#PresidentMacron

#FirstLadyMacron

#Defamation

#FirstAmendment

Following a jury award of $10 Million in Punitive/Compensatory Damages on February 27, 2026, University of Idaho Professor/Plaintiff Rebecca Scofield on March 19, 2026 filed a packet seeking reimbursement of her attorney's fees and costs. Here we provide an update on the status of the court's consideration of Plaintiff's post-judgment six-figure fee motion as well as one other post-judgment issue concerning evidence of any appeal by Defendant Guillard a content creator/psychic/tarot card reader.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:

Amendment I:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

#ProfessorScofield

#AshleyGuillard

#Idaho4

#Idaho4Defamation

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, speculations concerning the high-profile case of Idaho v. Wondra, the docket is available for the public to view free of charge on the Idaho Supreme Court's Cases of Judicial Interest website. On this date March 26, 2026, a Notice of Hearing appeared on the docket revealing that a new judge has been assigned and that Mr. Wondra's preliminary hearing is now set to occur on April 3. 2026.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright

#MichaelVaughn

#StatevWondra

#PreliminaryHearing

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, speculations concerning the high-profile case of Idaho v. Wondra, the docket is available for the public to view free of charge on the Idaho Supreme Court's Cases of Judicial Interest website. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright

Here we provide pure opinions, commentary and speculation concerning confusion surrounding a new court document that dropped onto the docket today March 24, 2026 as compared to the Case Summary Page for the highly sealed long-closed case of Idaho v. Kohberge.Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#Idaho4

#IdahovKohberger

#FirstAmendment

#FreeSpeech

Here we provide an update and opinions concerning an upcoming May 18, 2026 hearing on a public records lawsuit before Judge Megan E. Marshall - EWU Media LLC vs. City of Moscow/Moscow Police Department. The Plaintiffs from last year's Laramie et al. vs. City of Moscow successfully obtaining an injunction against the City of Moscow from releasing certain images from the MPD's investigation into the crimes at 1122 King Road on November 13, 2022. Page 7 of EWU's Petition is discussed here. #Idaho4 #EWUMedia #FirstAmendment

EWU Playlists (Pages 1-6) LINK: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbLUtgSDXdFO-dy3VgIaUyUqCeVCeURzNEverything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. First AmendmentCongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.Additionally, It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning a question that has been the topic of conversation. Now that it has been determined the high profile case of Goncalves et al v. WSU will not transfer out of the Western District which participates in the federal "cameras in the courtroom pilot program" information is related as to how a member of the public may request a proceeding to be video-recorded.Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. All parties who are charged with crimes are considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless they (1) are adjudicated guilty in a court of law or (2) agree to plead guilty. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Here we provide an update and opinions concerning an upcoming May 18, 2026 hearing on a public records lawsuit before Judge Megan E. Marshall - EWU Media LLC vs. City of Moscow/Moscow Police Department. The Plaintiffs from last year's Laramie et al. vs. City of Moscow successfully obtaining an injunction against the City of Moscow from releasing certain images from the MPD's investigation into the crimes at 1122 King Rod on November 13, 2022. LINK to our YT community page (March 21, 2026): https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZoNe/posts Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice.

First Amendment

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Here we provide pure opinions, commentary and speculation concerning the reassignment of defense counsel to Mr. Wondra in this high profile criminal case which is currently proceeding in the State of Idaho concerning the tragic disappearance of Michael Vaughn.

The prosecution has filed (1) demands for discovery and (2) a statutory demand for alibi from the defense. Additionally a notice of cancellation of the arraignment hearing was filed by the Clerk of Court.

These public records appear:    / @kathysindiez.  . (https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZ...)

The entire court docket is located on the Idaho Cases of Judicial Interest website alongside the Kohberger case for access to all the filings, the public docket, and case summary page free of charge to the public here: https://coi.isc.idaho.gov (https://www.youtube.com/redirect?even...) Mr. Wondra is considered under the eyes of the law to be innocent of all charges until or unless he (1) pleads guilty or is adjudicated guilty in a court of law.Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.