Here we provide pure comments, opinions and speculation based on the First Amendment regarding the appeal styled as Richard M. Allen v. State of Indiana. We also discuss how the public may obtain the appellate case file - free of charge -

Link to Indiana appellate court website discussed here:

https://public.courts.in.gov/mycase/#/vw/Search

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

#RichardAllen

#DelphiCase

#DelphiAppeal

#AbbyandLibby

Here we provide pure opinions, commentary and speculation concerning a request for the preliminary hearing transcript which has been denied. LINK to our YT channel where this public record appears:https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZ...The entire court docket is located on the Idaho Cases of Judicial Interest website alongside the Kohberger case for access to all the filings, the public docket, and case summary page free of charge to the public here: https://coi.isc.idaho.govEverything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Here we provide pure opinions, commentary and speculation concerning a March 10, 2026 Court Order released the afternoon of March 12, 2026 discussing five of the 90 documents Judge Hippler ordered to be unsealed back on December 18, 2025 - all but 1 remains sealed to the public.

This order and the Idaho v Kohberger court docket/case summary page is located on the Idaho Cases of Interest website here: ⁠https://coi.isc.idaho.gov⁠

The Ada County Court's Website with the notification that all sealed documents approved for unsealing will appear on the Idaho Cases of Interest Website is here:

 ⁠Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

#Idaho4

#BryanKohberger

#FreeSpeech

#FirstAmendment

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning post-closure events in the matter styled as Scofield v. Guillard, the "Idaho4" Defamation Case and any possible appeal of the $10 million final judgment entered March 5, 2026 following a four-day jury trial. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright

Here we provide full and pure opinions, comments and speculations regarding the civil matter styled as Goncalves et al. vs. Washington State University. A new document, Number 22, hit the federal court docket today announcing that a third assistant attorney general, Hannah Justice Esq., has joined the WSU defense team.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

#AttorneyJustice

#Idaho4

#FreeSpeech

#WSU

Here we provide pure opinions, commentary and speculation concerning a March 10, 2026 Court Order released the afternoon of March 12, 2026 discussing five of the 90 documents Judge Hippler ordered to be unsealed back on December 18, 2025 - all but 1 remains sealed to the public.

This order and the Idaho v Kohberger court docket/case summary page is located on the Idaho Cases of Judicial Interest website here: https://coi.isc.idaho.gov

Our sister YT channel is here:    / @kathysindiezone  Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Here we provide pure opinions, commentary and speculation concerning the disqualification of the district court judge in the high profile criminal proceeding of Idaho v. Wondra - after just 6 days on the case per Rule 25(a)(1) - which did not apply to the judge in Idaho v. Kohberger - another high profile case. The entire Wondra court docket is located on the Idaho Cases of Judicial Interest website alongside the Kohberger case for access to all the filings, the public docket, and case summary page free of charge to the public here:

https://coi.isc.idaho.gov

The order of disqualification in Wondra and the Supreme Court order appointing Judge Hippler in Kohberger appear here:

https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZoNe/posts

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Here we provide pure opinions, commentary and speculation concerning the disqualification of the district court judge in the high profile criminal proceeding of Idaho v. Wondra - after just 6 days on the case.

The entire court docket is located on the Idaho Cases of Judicial Interest website alongside the Kohberger case for access to all the filings, the public docket, and case summary page free of charge to the public here: https://coi.isc.idaho.govEverything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the current status of the civil defamation case styled as Macron v. Owens, where the President and First Lady of France have sued podcaster Candace Owens alleging the defendant defamed Ms. Macron by claiming she was born a man, "switched" identities with a male, and has engaged in other acts of defamation against her. Here in providing pure opinions, commentary and speculation per the First Amendment which is cited to and quoted, we also note the Defendants have filed a Motion to Dismiss the Lawsuit. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#CandaceOwens #Macron #FirstAmendment

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation per the First Amendment quoting and citing to it while discussing a forthcoming United States Supreme Court proceeding that could change the legal standard for those who wish to set aside plea deals revisiting the Supreme Court's 2019 precedent in Garza v. Idaho. Oral argument occurred before SCOTUS on March 3, 2026.

The rhetorical question is asked of when may a SCOTUS ruling be expected - based on the time between oral argument and a ruling in the Supreme Court's recent opinion.LINK to SCOTUS Oral Argument Page: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arg...LINK to Hunter vs. United States SCOTUS case file: https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/d...Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠