Kathy's InDieZoNe

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation per the First Amendment concerning the highly sealed Idaho v. Kohberger criminal case which continues to be highly sealed today 8 months post-closure back in July 2025. We discuss the court's December 18, 2025 court order directing multiple documents to be unsealed which are still sealed from public disclosure today.

LINK to the December 18, 2025 court order and other public records in Idaho v. Kohberger:

https://coi.isc.idaho.gov

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

A defendant is considered innocent of all charges until or unless he or she pleads guilty or is adjudicated guilty in a court of law.

#Idaho4

#BryanKohberger

#FirstAmendment

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation per the First Amendment concerning the highly sealed Idaho v. Kohberger criminal case which continues to be highly sealed today 8 months post-closure back in July 2025.

LINK to the court's records in Idaho v. Kohberger:

https://coi.isc.idaho.gov

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

A defendant is considered innocent of all charges until or unless he or she pleads guilty or Is adjudicated guilty in a court of law.

#Idaho4

#BryanKohberger

#StaceyWondra

#FirstAmendment

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation per the First Amendment concerning the 2 district court cases on the Idaho Cases of Interest Website where 1 currently proceeding has been open to the public and the other sealed from the public even today 8 months post-closure.

LINK: https://coi.isc.idaho.gov

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

A defendant is considered innocent of all charges until or unless he or she pleads guilty or Is adjudicated guilty in a court of law.

#Idaho4

#BryanKohberger

#StaceyWondra

#FirstAmendment

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the Idaho4 Defamation case, a 2 count federal lawsuit alleging defamation of character by a University of Idaho (Moscow) History Professor against an on-line personality/content creator and psychic in the case styled as Rebecca Scofield v. Ashley Guillard. Following a four day jury trial returning a verdict of $10 million in favor of Plaintiff , the federal court on March 5, 2026 entered a final judgment in this amount.

The rhetorical question is asked: Will Defendant appeal and if so, what is the process and deadline to do so?

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

#Idaho4

#BryanKohberger

#RebeccaScofield

#AshleyGuillard

Here we provide pure opinions, commentary and speculation concerning the high profile criminal case of Idaho v Wondra, concerning the tragic disappearance of Michael Vaughn. Following a 3 day preliminary hearing, Judge Lee found probable cause exists to bind Mr. Wondra over for trial in district court . Arraignment is set for April 15, 2026.

The entire court docket is located on the Idaho Cases of Judicial Interest website alongside the Kohberger case for access to all the filings, the public docket, and case summary page free of charge to the public here: https://coi.isc.idaho.gov

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Mr. Wondra is presumed innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless he (1) pleads guilty or (2) is adjudicated guilty following trial.

#MichaelVaughn

#IdahovWondra

#PreliminaryHearing

#FreeSpeech

Here we provide an update of pure opinions, comments, and speculation per the First Amendment citing to official records maintained by the Ventura County Sheriff's Office concerning the arrest this date of the celebrity/entertainer Britney Spears.

We ask the rhetorical question based on the First Amendment of: As of today, 1.5 days after her arrest, no details appear in any public record stating why Ms. Spears was arrested. Yet it appears she has been tried and convicted by MSM who at one time celebrated her as the "Princess of Pop".

LINK to official records referenced in this podcast episode: https://sheriff.venturacounty.gov/inmate-information/

https://ventura.courts.ca.gov

Ms. Spears is considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless she (1) pleads guilty or (2) is adjudicated guilty in a court of law.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

#BritneySpears

#CAvSpears

#FirstAmendment

Here we provide pure opinions, commentary and speculation concerning the high profile criminal case of Idaho v Wondra, concerning the tragic disappearance of Michael Vaughn. Minutes from the Preliminary Hearing (Days 1-2) are now available for public review on the Idaho Cases of Interest Website.

Judge Lee will ultimately determine if the state produced sufficient evidence to bind Mr. Wondra over for trial.

The minutes discussed here as well as the entire court docket is located on the Idaho Cases of Judicial Interest website alongside the Kohberger case for access to all the filings, the public docket, and case summary page free of charge to the public here: https://coi.isc.idaho.gov

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Mr. Wondra is presumed innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless he (1) pleads guilty or (2) is adjudicated guilty following trial.

#MichaelVaughn

#IdahovWondra

#PreliminaryHearing

#FreeSpeech

Here we provide an update of pure opinions, comments, and speculation per the First Amendment citing to official records maintained by the Ventura County Sheriff's Office concerning the arrest this date of the celebrity/entertainer Britney Spears.

We ask the rhetorical question based on the First Amendment of: As of 2 PM LA time, there are no details regarding what this arrest is all about, yet multiple outlets appear to have already convicted her

LINK to official records referenced in this podcast episode: https://sheriff.venturacounty.gov/inmate-information/

Ms. Spears is considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless she (1) pleads guilty or (2) is adjudicated guilty in a court of law.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

#BritneySpears

#CAvSpears

#FirstAmendment

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning events occurring in the Idaho4 Defamation case, a 2 count federal lawsuit alleging defamation of character by a University of Idaho (Moscow) History Professor against an on-line personality/content creator and psychic in the case styled as Rebecca Scofield v. Ashley Guillard. Following a four day jury trial returning a verdict of $10 million in favor of Plaintiff , the federal court on March 5, 2026 entered a final judgment in this amount. The rhetorical question is asked: Will Defendant appeal?

LINK To YT channel described in this podcast episode: https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZoNe

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

#Idaho4

#BryanKohberger

#RebeccaScofield

#AshleyGuillard

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation per the First Amendment citing to official records maintained by the Ventura County Sheriff's Office concerning the arrest this date of the celebrity/entertainer Britney Spears.

LINK to official records referenced in this podcast episode: https://sheriff.venturacounty.gov/inmate-information/

Ms. Spears is considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless she (1) pleads guilty or (2) is adjudicated guilty in a court of law.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

#BritneySpears

#CAvSpears

#FirstAmendment