Kathy's InDieZoNe

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation per the First Amendment concerning the highly sealed Idaho v. Kohberger criminal case which continues to remain that way today 8 months post-closure of the case in July 2025. We discuss the court's October 16, 2025 and December 18, 2025 regarding the unsealing of 89 sealed documents from Jan-March 2025. We also discuss a Feb. 9, 2026 public filing as indicated on the Case Summary Page which has yet to be released.

LINK to these court orders, the Case Summary Page, and other public records in Idaho v. Kohberger: https://coi.isc.idaho.gov

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠A defendant is considered innocent of all charges until or unless he or she pleads guilty or is adjudicated guilty in a court of law.

#Idaho4

#BryanKohberger

#FirstAmendment

Here we provide full and pure opinions, comments and speculations regarding the matter styled as Goncalves et al. vs. Washington State University and the status of WSU's Response to the Plaintiffs' February 27, 2026 Motion to Strike their Answer. Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

Here we provide an update of pure opinions, comments, and speculation per the First Amendment citing to official records maintained by the Ventura County Sheriff's Office concerning the arrest and detainment on March 4-5, 2026 the celebrity/entertainer Britney Spears.

We ask the rhetorical question based on the First Amendment whether based on known, verifiable facts: Was Ms. Spears subjected to trial by media or was she afforded preferential treatment by law enforcement?

LINK to official records referenced in this podcast episode: https://sheriff.venturacounty.gov/inmate-information/

https://ventura.courts.ca.gov

Ms. Spears is considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless she (1) pleads guilty or (2) is adjudicated guilty in a court of law.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

#BritneySpears

#CAvSpears

#FirstAmendment

Here we provide full and pure opinions, comments and speculations regarding the matter styled as Goncalves et al. vs. Washington State University and the status of any hearings on the pending defense Motion to Transfer Venue.

Link to public records on the court's website regarding hearings:

https://www.wawd.uscourts.gov/calendar/today

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation per the First Amendment quoting and citing to it while discussing the lack of transparency in the long-closed high profile criminal case of Idaho v. Kohberger and compare it to the transparency seen in another high-profile Idaho criminal case of Idaho v. Wondra. We discuss yet another example of a defense discovery filing in Wondra docketed today revealing the openness of that case in the public domain vs. the sealed status of the Kohberger case that continues long after its closure.

Link to our YT community page where the Wondra discovery request appears: https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZoNe/posts

Link to the Idaho cases of interest webpage where the Kohberger and Wondra court records are published:

https://coi.isc.idaho.gov

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

#Idaho4

#IdahovKohberger

#IdahovWondra

#FreeSpeech

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the Plaintiff's Demand for a Jury Trial set forth in the January 7, 2026 Complaint in the high-profile civil case of Goncalves et al. v. Washington State University, in regards to whether a jury trial has been scheduled as of yet.

LINK: Podcast Episode Discussing Motion to Transfer Venue:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-UOXyTIKPA&t=36s

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.#WSU

#JuryTrial

#Idaho4

#FreeSpeech

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the Defense Motion to Transfer Venue which has been pending in the high-profile civil case of Goncalves et al. v. Washington State University. Now that the briefings are closed, has the court rendered a ruling or scheduled a hearing to entertain oral argument as requested by Plaintiffs on the matter? Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

Here we provide an update of pure opinions, comments, and speculation concerning the public vilification and in some instance prosecution and conviction of former child star/global popular music entertainer Britney Spears without any former charges having been brought. LINK to official records referenced in this podcast episode: https://sheriff.venturacounty.gov/inm...https://ventura.courts.ca.govMs. Spears is considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless she (1) pleads guilty or (2) is adjudicated guilty in a court of law.Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Here we provide pure opinions, commentary and speculation concerning the high profile criminal case of Idaho v Wondra, and discuss two documents available on the public record revealing an unnoticed and sealed hearing occurred in chambers during the preliminary hearing on March 5, 2026. The entire court docket is located on the Idaho Cases of Judicial Interest website for access to all the filings, free of charge to the public here: https://coi.isc.idaho.govEverything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Mr. Wondra is presumed innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless he (1) pleads guilty or (2) is adjudicated guilty following trial.

#StaceyWondra

#StatevWondra

#MichaelVaughn

#FreeSpeech

#FirstAmendment

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation per the First Amendment concerning the highly sealed Idaho v. Kohberger criminal case which continues to be highly sealed today 8 months post-closure back in July 2025. We discuss the court's October 16, 2025 and December 18, 2025 regarding the unsealing of sealed documents from Jan-March 2025. LINK to these court orders and other public records in Idaho v. Kohberger: https://coi.isc.idaho.govEverything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠A defendant is considered innocent of all charges until or unless he or she pleads guilty or is adjudicated guilty in a court of law.#Idaho4#BryanKohberger#FirstAmendment