Kathy's InDieZoNe

Here we provide pure opinions, commentary and speculation concerning the reassignment of defense counsel to Mr. Wondra in this high profile criminal case which is currently proceeding in the State of Idaho concerning the tragic disappearance of Michael Vaughn. The prosecutor has now brought the Criminal Information Part I and Part II against Mr. Wondra. LINK to our YT channel where these public records appear: https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZ...The entire court docket is located on the Idaho Cases of Judicial Interest website alongside the Kohberger case for access to all the filings, the public docket, and case summary page free of charge to the public here: https://coi.isc.idaho.gov

Mr. Wondra is considered under the eyes of the law to be innocent of all charges until or unless he (1) pleads guilty or is adjudicated guilty in a court of law.Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright

Following a jury award of $10 Million in Punitive/Compensatory Damages on February 27, 2026, Plaintiff Scofield on March 19, 2026 filed a packet seeking reimbursement of her attorney's fees and costs.

LINK: https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZoNe/posts

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:

Amendment I:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

#ProfessorScofield

#AshleyGuillard

#Idaho4

#Idaho4Defamation

Here, we discuss a new document filed this date March 19, 2026 that has yielded major new developments in the high profile case of Goncalves et al. v. WSU.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

LINK to Kathy's Indiezone discussed in this podcast episode:

https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZoNe/posts

Here we provide pure opinions, commentary and speculation concerning confusion surrounding a new court document that dropped onto the docket today March 18, 2026 as compared to the Case Summary Page for the highly sealed long-closed case of Idaho v. Kohberge.

Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

LINK to Kathy's Indiezone discussed in this podcast episode:

https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZoNe/posts

Here we provide pure opinions, commentary and speculation concerning the non-disclosure of 89 documents ordered to be unsealed and placed onto the court docket per Judge Hippler's December 18, 2025 Court Order/a Public Announcement on the Ada County Website in the highly sealed case. The Ada County Court's Website with the notification that all sealed documents approved for unsealing will appear on the Idaho Cases of Interest Website is here: https://adacounty.id.gov/judicial-cou... Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠#Idaho4

#BryanKohberger

#FirstAmendment

#FreeSpeech

#Evidence

Here we provide an update and opinions concerning an upcoming May 18, 2026 hearing on a public records lawsuit before Judge Megan E. Marshall - EWU Media LLC vs. City of Moscow/Moscow Police Department. The Plaintiffs from last year's Laramie et al. vs. City of Moscow successfully obtaining an injunction against the City of Moscow from releasing certain images from the MPD's investigation into the crimes at 1122 King Rod on November 13, 2022.

LINK to our YT community page: https://www.youtube.com/@KathysIndieZoNe/posts

Everything presented here represents the pure opinions and comments of the host for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and/or research per Amend. I, U.S. Const. and does not nor is it intended to provide legal advice. It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act,which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation per the First Amendment quoting and citing to it while discussing a forthcoming United States Supreme Court proceeding that could change the legal standard for those who wish to set aside plea deals revisiting the Supreme Court's 2019 precedent in Garza v. Idaho. The rhetorical question is also discussed raising pure opinions, comments and speculation as to whether this might change the legal climate should Mr. Kohberger the defendant in Idaho v. Kohberger seek at some point in future to challenge his appeal waiver set forth within his plea agreement. Note: There is no indication Mr. Kohberger has sought/will seek to challenge his plea deal as of the time of the recording of this presentation.

LINK TO SCOTUS WEBSITE WHERE TRANSCRIPT AND MP3 FROM HEARING APPEAR: https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2025/24-1063LINK to Hunter vs. United States SCOTUS case file: https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/d...Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

#HuntervUS

#AppealWaivers

#Idaho4

#IdahovKohberger

Here we provide full and pure opinions, comments and speculations regarding the civil matter styled as Goncalves et al. vs. Washington State University concerning two motions that are currently before the federal court Judge Evanson who is presiding over the case.Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

#FirstAmendment

#WashingtonStateUniversity

#Idaho4

Here we provide pure opinions, comments, and speculation per the First Amendment citing to official records maintained by the Ventura County Sheriff's Office concerning the arrest on March 4, 2026 of the celebrity/entertainer Britney Spears. We note that as of this date March 15, 2026 there still is no information relating the reason for her arrest or why she is scheduled to be in court on May 4, 2026 at 8:15 in California Superior Court. A review of state court records reveal no case has been opened as of yet. LINK to official records referenced in this podcast episode: https://sheriff.venturacounty.gov/inm...Ms. Spears is considered innocent under the eyes of the law until or unless she (1) pleads guilty or (2) is adjudicated guilty in a court of law.Everything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states:Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

According to authorities in Seattle, Kurt Cobain the iconic musician, songwriter, singer and founding member of Nirvana unalived himself on April 5, 1994 at age 27. Some have doubted the official story for years, including the private detective Tom Grant hired by Mr. Cobain's wife Courtney Love to locate Mr. Cobain after he went missing shortly before he was discovered at his Seattle home. In 2026, a team of independent forensic scientists urged the authorities to conduct a fresh investigation after they stated they conducted a review and determined a homicide occurred. The Seattle police department announced there will be no reopening of the case and they are standing by the original finding. We here at the IndieZone will discuss the "official" narrative vs. the "alternate" narrative as always based on the records in our new series called "What Happened to Kurt?" Amend. I, U.S. Const. WHAT HAPPENED TO KURT? Playlist ---) https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbLUtgSDXdFO-dy3VgIaUyUqCeVCeURzNEverything here represents the pure opinion, commentary, speculation and rhetorical questions per the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which states at Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.It is codified within Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, which provides that fair use of a work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, or research)” is not an infringement of copyright.

#KurtCobain

#Nirvana

#FreeSpeech